Awesome
<img src="docs/source/images/logo/libkge-header-2880.png" alt="LibKGE: A knowledge graph embedding library" width="80%">
LibKGE is a PyTorch-based library for efficient training, evaluation, and hyperparameter optimization of knowledge graph embeddings (KGE). It is highly configurable, easy to use, and extensible. Other KGE frameworks are listed below.
The key goal of LibKGE is to foster reproducible research into (as well as meaningful comparisons between) KGE models and training methods. As we argue in our ICLR 2020 paper (see video), the choice of training strategy and hyperparameters are very influential on model performance, often more so than the model class itself. LibKGE aims to provide clean implementations of training, hyperparameter optimization, and evaluation strategies that can be used with any model. Every potential knob or heuristic implemented in the framework is exposed explicitly via well-documented configuration files (e.g., see here and here). LibKGE also provides the most common KGE models and new ones can be easily added (contributions welcome!).
For link prediction tasks, rule-based systems such as AnyBURL are a competitive alternative to KGE.
UPDATE: LibKGE now includes GraSH, an efficient multi-fidelity hyperparameter optimization algorithm for large-scale KGE models. See here for an example on how to use it.
Quick start
# retrieve and install project in development mode
git clone https://github.com/uma-pi1/kge.git
cd kge
pip install -e .
# download and preprocess datasets
cd data
sh download_all.sh
cd ..
# train an example model on toy dataset (you can omit '--job.device cpu' when you have a gpu)
kge start examples/toy-complex-train.yaml --job.device cpu
Table of contents
- Features
- Results and pretrained models
- Using LibKGE
- Currently supported KGE models
- Extending LibKGE
- FAQ
- Known issues
- Changelog
- Other KGE frameworks
- How to cite
Features
- Training
- Training types: negative sampling, 1vsAll, KvsAll
- Losses: binary cross entropy (BCE), Kullback-Leibler divergence (KL), margin ranking (MR), squared error (SE)
- All optimizers and learning rate schedulers of PyTorch supported and can be chosen individually for different parameters (e.g., different for entity and for relation embeddings)
- Learning rate warmup
- Early stopping
- Checkpointing
- Stop (e.g., via
Ctrl-C
) and resume at any time - Automatic memory management to support large batch sizes (see config key
train.subbatch_auto_tune
)
- Hyperparameter tuning
- Evaluation
- Entity ranking metrics: Mean Reciprocal Rank (MRR), HITS@k with/without filtering
- Drill-down by: relation type, relation frequency, head or tail
- Extensive logging and tracing
- Detailed progress information about training, hyper-parameter tuning, and evaluation is recorded in machine readable formats
- Quick export of all/selected parts of the traced data into CSV or YAML files to facilitate analysis
- KGE models
- All models can be used with or without reciprocal relations
- RESCAL (code, config)
- TransE (code, config)
- TransH (code, config)
- DistMult (code, config)
- ComplEx (code, config)
- ConvE (code, config)
- RelationalTucker3/TuckER (code, config)
- CP (code, config)
- SimplE (code, config)
- RotatE (code, config)
- Transformer ("No context" model) (code, config)
- Embedders
Results and pretrained models
We list some example results (filtered MRR and HITS@k on test data) obtained with LibKGE below. These results are obtained by running automatic hyperparameter search as described here.
These results are not necessarily the best results that can be achieved using LibKGE, but they are comparable in that a common experimental setup (and equal amount of work) has been used for hyperparameter optimization for each model. Since we use filtered MRR for model selection, our results may not be indicative of the achievable model performance for other validation metrics (such as HITS@10, which has been used for model selection elsewhere).
We report performance numbers on the entire test set, including the triples that contain entities not seen during training. This is not done consistently throughout existing KGE implementations: some frameworks remove unseen entities from the test set, which leads to a perceived increase in performance (e.g., roughly add +3pp to our WN18RR MRR numbers for this method of evaluation).
We also provide pretrained models for these results. Each pretrained model is given in the form of a LibKGE checkpoint, which contains the model as well as additional information (such as the configuration being used). See the documentation below on how to use checkpoints.
FB15K-237 (Freebase)
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | Pretrained model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESCAL | 0.356 | 0.263 | 0.393 | 0.541 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
TransE | 0.313 | 0.221 | 0.347 | 0.497 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
DistMult | 0.343 | 0.250 | 0.378 | 0.531 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
ComplEx | 0.348 | 0.253 | 0.384 | 0.536 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
ConvE | 0.339 | 0.248 | 0.369 | 0.521 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
RotatE | 0.333 | 0.240 | 0.368 | 0.522 | config.yaml | NegSamp-bce |
WN18RR (Wordnet)
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | Pretrained model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESCAL | 0.467 | 0.439 | 0.480 | 0.517 | config.yaml | KvsAll-kl |
TransE | 0.228 | 0.053 | 0.368 | 0.520 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
DistMult | 0.452 | 0.413 | 0.466 | 0.530 | config.yaml | KvsAll-kl |
ComplEx | 0.475 | 0.438 | 0.490 | 0.547 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
ConvE | 0.442 | 0.411 | 0.451 | 0.504 | config.yaml | KvsAll-kl |
RotatE | 0.478 | 0.439 | 0.494 | 0.553 | config.yaml | NegSamp-bce |
FB15K (Freebase)
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | Pretrained model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESCAL | 0.644 | 0.544 | 0.708 | 0.824 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
TransE | 0.676 | 0.542 | 0.787 | 0.875 | config.yaml | NegSamp-bce |
DistMult | 0.841 | 0.806 | 0.863 | 0.903 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
ComplEx | 0.838 | 0.807 | 0.856 | 0.893 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
ConvE | 0.825 | 0.781 | 0.855 | 0.896 | config.yaml | KvsAll-bce |
RotatE | 0.783 | 0.727 | 0.820 | 0.877 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
WN18 (Wordnet)
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | Pretrained model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESCAL | 0.948 | 0.943 | 0.951 | 0.956 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
TransE | 0.553 | 0.315 | 0.764 | 0.924 | config.yaml | NegSamp-bce |
DistMult | 0.941 | 0.932 | 0.948 | 0.954 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
ComplEx | 0.951 | 0.947 | 0.953 | 0.958 | config.yaml | KvsAll-kl |
ConvE | 0.947 | 0.943 | 0.949 | 0.953 | config.yaml | 1vsAll-kl |
RotatE | 0.946 | 0.943 | 0.948 | 0.953 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
Yago3-10 (YAGO)
LibKGE supports large datasets such as Yago3-10 (123k entities) and Wikidata5M (4.8M entities). The results given below were found by automatic hyperparameter search with a similar search space as above, but with some values fixed (training with shared negative sampling, embedding dimension: 128, batch size: 1024, optimizer: Adagrad, regularization: weighted). The Yago3-10 result was obtained by training 30 pseudo-random configurations for 20 epochs, and then rerunning the configuration that performed best on validation data for 400 epochs.
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | Pretrained model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ComplEx | 0.551 | 0.476 | 0.596 | 0.682 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
Wikidata5M (Wikidata)
We report two results for Wikidata5m. The first result was found by the same automatic hyperparameter search as described for Yago3-10, but we limited the final training to 200 epochs. The second result was obtained with significantly less resource consumption by using the multi-fidelity GraSH search.
Search + budget | Final training | MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | Pretrained model | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ComplEx | Random, 600 epochs | 200 epochs | 0.301 | 0.245 | 0.331 | 0.397 | config.yaml | NegSamp-kl |
ComplEx | GraSH, 192 epochs | 64 epochs | 0.300 | 0.247 | 0.328 | 0.390 | config.yaml | - |
Freebase
GraSH was also applied to Freebase, one of the largest benchmarking datasets containing 86M entities. The reported results were obtained by combining GraSH with distributed training implemented in Dist-KGE. The respective config files can be found in the GraSH repository as their execution is not yet supported in LibKGE.
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ComplEx | 0.594 | 0.511 | 0.667 | 0.726 |
RotatE | 0.613 | 0.578 | 0.637 | 0.669 |
TransE | 0.553 | 0.520 | 0.571 | 0.614 |
CoDEx
CoDEx is a Wikidata-based KG completion benchmark. The results here have been obtained using the automatic hyperparameter search used for the Freebase and WordNet datasets, but with fewer epochs and Ax trials for CoDEx-M and CoDEx-L. See the CoDEx paper (EMNLP 2020) for details.
CoDEx-S
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESCAL | 0.404 | 0.293 | 0.4494 | 0.623 | config.yaml |
TransE | 0.354 | 0.219 | 0.4218 | 0.634 | config.yaml |
ComplEx | 0.465 | 0.372 | 0.5038 | 0.646 | config.yaml |
ConvE | 0.444 | 0.343 | 0.4926 | 0.635 | config.yaml |
TuckER | 0.444 | 0.339 | 0.4975 | 0.638 | config.yaml |
CoDEx-M
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESCAL | 0.317 | 0.244 | 0.3477 | 0.456 | config.yaml |
TransE | 0.303 | 0.223 | 0.3363 | 0.454 | config.yaml |
ComplEx | 0.337 | 0.262 | 0.3701 | 0.476 | config.yaml |
ConvE | 0.318 | 0.239 | 0.3551 | 0.464 | config.yaml |
TuckER | 0.328 | 0.259 | 0.3599 | 0.458 | config.yaml |
CoDEx-L
MRR | Hits@1 | Hits@3 | Hits@10 | Config file | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
RESCAL | 0.304 | 0.242 | 0.3313 | 0.419 | config.yaml |
TransE | 0.187 | 0.116 | 0.2188 | 0.317 | config.yaml |
ComplEx | 0.294 | 0.237 | 0.3179 | 0.400 | config.yaml |
ConvE | 0.303 | 0.240 | 0.3298 | 0.420 | config.yaml |
TuckER | 0.309 | 0.244 | 0.3395 | 0.430 | config.yaml |
Using LibKGE
LibKGE supports training, evaluation, and hyperparameter tuning of KGE models. The settings for each task can be specified with a configuration file in YAML format or on the command line. The default values and usage for available settings can be found in config-default.yaml as well as the model- and embedder-specific configuration files (such as lookup_embedder.yaml).
Train a model
First create a configuration file such as:
job.type: train
dataset.name: fb15k-237
train:
optimizer: Adagrad
optimizer_args:
lr: 0.2
valid:
every: 5
metric: mean_reciprocal_rank_filtered
model: complex
lookup_embedder:
dim: 100
regularize_weight: 0.8e-7
To begin training, run one of the following:
# Store the file as `config.yaml` in a new folder of your choice. Then initiate or resume
# the training job using:
kge resume <folder>
# Alternatively, store the configuration anywhere and use the start command
# to create a new folder
# <kge-home>/local/experiments/<date>-<config-file-name>
# with that config and start training there.
kge start <config-file>
# In both cases, configuration options can be modified on the command line, too: e.g.,
kge start <config-file> config.yaml --job.device cuda:0 --train.optimizer Adam
Various checkpoints (including model parameters and configuration options) will be created during training. These checkpoints can be used to resume training (or any other job type such as hyperparameter search jobs).
Resume training
All of LibKGE's jobs can be interrupted (e.g., via Ctrl-C
) and resumed (from one of its checkpoints). To resume a job, use:
kge resume <folder>
# Change the device when resuming
kge resume <folder> --job.device cuda:1
By default, the last checkpoint file is used. The filename of the checkpoint can be overwritten using --checkpoint
.
Evaluate a trained model
To evaluate trained model, run the following:
# Evaluate a model on the validation split
kge valid <folder>
# Evaluate a model on the test split
kge test <folder>
By default, the checkpoint file named checkpoint_best.pt
(which stores the best validation result so far) is used. The filename of the checkpoint can be overwritten using --checkpoint
.
Hyperparameter optimization
LibKGE supports various forms of hyperparameter optimization such as grid search, random search, Bayesian optimization, or resource-efficient multi-fidelity search. The search type and search space are specified in the configuration file.
For example, you may use Ax for SOBOL (pseudo-random) and Bayesian optimization. The following config file defines a search of 10 SOBOL trials (arms) followed by 20 Bayesian optimization trials:
job.type: search
search.type: ax
dataset.name: wnrr
model: complex
valid.metric: mean_reciprocal_rank_filtered
ax_search:
num_trials: 30
num_sobol_trials: 10 # remaining trials are Bayesian
parameters:
- name: train.batch_size
type: choice
values: [256, 512, 1024]
- name: train.optimizer_args.lr
type: range
bounds: [0.0003, 1.0]
- name: train.type
type: fixed
value: 1vsAll
For large graph datasets such as Wikidata5m, you may use GraSH, which enables resource-efficient hyperparameter optimization. A full documentation of the GraSH functionality, useful search configs, and obtained results can be found in the accompanying repository. The following example config defines a search of 64 randomly generated trials with a search budget equivalent to only 3 full training runs on the whole dataset:
job.type: search
search.type: grash_search
dataset.name: wikidata5m
model: complex
valid.metric: mean_reciprocal_rank_filtered
grash_search:
num_trials: 64 # initial number of randomly generated trials
search_budget: 3 # in terms of full training runs on the whole dataset
eta: 4 # reduction factor - only keep 1/eta best-performing trials per round
variant: combined # low-fidelity approximation technique - combined = epoch + graph reduction
parameters:
- name: train.batch_size
type: choice
values: [256, 512, 1024]
- name: train.optimizer_args.lr
type: range
bounds: [0.0003, 1.0]
- name: train.type
type: fixed
value: 1vsAll
Trials can be run in parallel across several devices:
# Run 4 trials in parallel evenly distributed across two GPUs
kge resume <folder> --search.device_pool cuda:0,cuda:1 --search.num_workers 4
# Run 3 trials in parallel, with per GPUs capacity
kge resume <folder> --search.device_pool cuda:0,cuda:1,cuda:1 --search.num_workers 3
Export and analyze logs and checkpoints
Extensive logs are stored as YAML files (hyperparameter search, training, validation). LibKGE provides a convenience methods to export the log data to CSV.
kge dump trace <folder>
The command above yields CSV output such as this output for a training job or this output for a search job. Additional configuration options or metrics can be added to the CSV files as needed (using a keys file).
Information about a checkpoint (such as the configuration that was used, training loss, validation metrics, or explored hyperparameter configurations) can also be exported from the command line (as YAML):
kge dump checkpoint <checkpoint>
Configuration files can also be dumped in various formats.
# dump just the configuration options that are different from the default values
kge dump config <config-or-folder-or-checkpoint>
# dump the configuration as is
kge dump config <config-or-folder-or-checkpoint> --raw
# dump the expanded config including all configuration keys
kge dump config <config-or-folder-or-checkpoint> --full
Help and other commands
# help on all commands
kge --help
# help on a specific command
kge dump --help
Use a pretrained model in an application
Using a trained model trained with LibKGE is straightforward. In the following example, we load a checkpoint and predict the most suitable object for a two subject-relations pairs: ('Dominican Republic', 'has form of government', ?) and ('Mighty Morphin Power Rangers', 'is tv show with actor', ?).
import torch
from kge.model import KgeModel
from kge.util.io import load_checkpoint
# download link for this checkpoint given under results above
checkpoint = load_checkpoint('fb15k-237-rescal.pt')
model = KgeModel.create_from(checkpoint)
s = torch.Tensor([0, 2,]).long() # subject indexes
p = torch.Tensor([0, 1,]).long() # relation indexes
scores = model.score_sp(s, p) # scores of all objects for (s,p,?)
o = torch.argmax(scores, dim=-1) # index of highest-scoring objects
print(o)
print(model.dataset.entity_strings(s)) # convert indexes to mentions
print(model.dataset.relation_strings(p))
print(model.dataset.entity_strings(o))
# Output (slightly revised for readability):
#
# tensor([8399, 8855])
# ['Dominican Republic' 'Mighty Morphin Power Rangers']
# ['has form of government' 'is tv show with actor']
# ['Republic' 'Johnny Yong Bosch']
For other scoring functions (score_sp, score_po, score_so, score_spo), see KgeModel.
Use your own dataset
To use your own dataset, create a subfolder mydataset
(= dataset name) in the data
folder. You can use your dataset later by specifying dataset.name: mydataset
in your job's configuration file.
Each dataset is described by a dataset.yaml
file, which needs to be stored in the mydataset
folder. After performing the quickstart instructions, have a look at the provided toy example under data/toy/dataset.yaml
. The configuration keys and file formats are documented here.
Your data can be automatically preprocessed and converted into the format required by LibKGE. Here is the relevant part for the toy
dataset, which see:
# download
curl -O http://web.informatik.uni-mannheim.de/pi1/kge-datasets/toy.tar.gz
tar xvf toy.tar.gz
# preprocess
python preprocess/preprocess_default.py toy
Currently supported KGE models
LibKGE currently implements the KGE models listed in features.
The examples folder contains some configuration files as examples of how to train these models.
We welcome contributions to expand the list of supported models! Please see CONTRIBUTING for details and feel free to initially open an issue.
Extending LibKGE
LibKGE can be extended with new training, evaluation, or search jobs as well as new models and embedders.
KGE models implement the KgeModel
class and generally consist of a
KgeEmbedder
to associate each subject, relation and object to an embedding and
a KgeScorer
to score triples given their embeddings. All these base classes
are defined in kge_model.py.
KGE jobs perform training, evaluation, and hyper-parameter search. The relevant base classes are Job, TrainingJob, EvaluationJob, and SearchJob.
To add a component, say mycomp
(= a model, embedder, or job) with
implementation MyClass
, you need to:
-
Create a configuration file
mycomp.yaml
. You may store this file directly in the LibKGE module folders (e.g.,<kge-home>/kge/model/
) or in your own module folder. If you plan to contribute your code to LibKGE, we suggest to directly develop in the LibKGE module folders. If you just want to play around or publish your code separately from LibKGE, use your own module. -
Define all required options for your component, their default values, and their types in
mycomp.yaml
. We suggest to follow LibKGE's core philosophy and define every option that can influence the outcome of an experiment in this way. Please pay attention w.r.t. integer (0
) vs. float (0.0
) values; e.g.,float_option: 0
is incorrect because is interpreted as an integer. -
Implement
MyClass
in a module of your choice. Inmycomp.yaml
, add keymycomp.class_name
with valueMyClass
. If you follow LibKGE's directory structure (mycomp.yaml
for configuration andmycomp.py
for implementation), then ensure thatMyClass
is imported in__init__.py
(e.g., as done here). -
To use your component in an experiment, register your module via the
modules
key and its configuration via theimport
key in the experiment's configuration file. See config-default.yaml for a description of those keys. For example, inmyexp_config.yaml
, add:modules: [ kge.job, kge.model, kge.model.embedder, mymodule ] import: [ mycomp ]
FAQ
Are the configuration options documented somewhere?
Yes, see config-default.yaml as well as the configuration files for each component listed above.
Are the command line options documented somewhere?
Yes, try kge --help
. You may also obtain help for subcommands, e.g., try kge dump --help
or kge dump trace --help
.
LibKGE runs out of memory. What can I do?
- For training, set
train.subbatch_auto_tune
to true (equivalent result, less memory but slower). - For evaluation, set
entity_ranking.chunk_size
to, say, 10000 (equivalent result, less memory but slightly slower, the more so the smaller the chunk size). - Change hyperparameters (non-equivalent result): e.g., decrease the batch size, use negative sampling, use less samples).
Known issues
Changelog
See here.
Other KGE frameworks
Other KGE frameworks:
KGE projects for publications that also implement a few models:
PRs to this list are welcome.
How to cite
Please cite the following publication to refer to the experimental study about the impact of training methods on KGE performance:
@inproceedings{
ruffinelli2020you,
title={You {CAN} Teach an Old Dog New Tricks! On Training Knowledge Graph Embeddings},
author={Daniel Ruffinelli and Samuel Broscheit and Rainer Gemulla},
booktitle={International Conference on Learning Representations},
year={2020},
url={https://openreview.net/forum?id=BkxSmlBFvr}
}
If you use LibKGE, please cite the following publication:
@inproceedings{
libkge,
title="{L}ib{KGE} - {A} Knowledge Graph Embedding Library for Reproducible Research",
author={Samuel Broscheit and Daniel Ruffinelli and Adrian Kochsiek and Patrick Betz and Rainer Gemulla},
booktitle={Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations},
year={2020},
url={https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-demos.22},
pages = "165--174",
}