Home

Awesome

<!-- Required extensions: pymdownx.betterem, pymdownx.tilde, pymdownx.emoji, pymdownx.tasklist, pymdownx.superfences -->

The Future will (be) Positive. Всё будет хорошо.

Please refer to the online documentation with C API description and pay attention to the C++ API.

Questions, feedback and suggestions are welcome to the Telegram' group.

For NEWS take a look to the ChangeLog.

https://t.me/libmdbx Version GithubCI AppveyorCI CircleCI CirrusCI Coverity Scan Status

libmdbx

<!-- section-begin overview -->

libmdbx is an extremely fast, compact, powerful, embedded, transactional key-value database, with permissive license. libmdbx has a specific set of properties and capabilities, focused on creating unique lightweight solutions.

  1. Allows a swarm of multi-threaded processes to ACIDly read and update several key-value maps and multimaps in a locally-shared database.

  2. Provides extraordinary performance, minimal overhead through Memory-Mapping and Olog(N) operations costs by virtue of B+ tree.

  3. Requires no maintenance and no crash recovery since it doesn't use WAL, but that might be a caveat for write-intensive workloads with durability requirements.

  4. Compact and friendly for fully embedding. Only ≈25KLOC of C11, ≈64K x86 binary code of core, no internal threads neither server process(es), but implements a simplified variant of the Berkeley DB and dbm API.

  5. Enforces serializability for writers just by single mutex and affords wait-free for parallel readers without atomic/interlocked operations, while writing and reading transactions do not block each other.

  6. Guarantee data integrity after crash unless this was explicitly neglected in favour of write performance.

  7. Supports Linux, Windows, MacOS, Android, iOS, FreeBSD, DragonFly, Solaris, OpenSolaris, OpenIndiana, NetBSD, OpenBSD and other systems compliant with POSIX.1-2008.

<!-- section-end -->

Historically, libmdbx is a deeply revised and extended descendant of the amazing Lightning Memory-Mapped Database. libmdbx inherits all benefits from LMDB, but resolves some issues and adds a set of improvements.

<!-- section-begin mithril -->

The next version is under active non-public development from scratch and will be released as MithrilDB and libmithrildb for libraries & packages. Admittedly mythical Mithril is resembling silver but being stronger and lighter than steel. Therefore MithrilDB is a rightly relevant name.

MithrilDB will be radically different from libmdbx by the new database format and API based on C++17, as well as the Apache 2.0 License. The goal of this revolution is to provide a clearer and robust API, add more features and new valuable properties of the database.

<!-- section-end -->

Table of Contents

Characteristics

<!-- section-begin characteristics -->

Features

Limitations

Gotchas

  1. There cannot be more than one writer at a time, i.e. no more than one write transaction at a time.

  2. libmdbx is based on B+ tree, so access to database pages is mostly random. Thus SSDs provide a significant performance boost over spinning disks for large databases.

  3. libmdbx uses shadow paging instead of WAL. Thus syncing data to disk might be a bottleneck for write intensive workload.

  4. libmdbx uses copy-on-write for snapshot isolation during updates, but read transactions prevents recycling an old retired/freed pages, since it read ones. Thus altering of data during a parallel long-lived read operation will increase the process work set, may exhaust entire free database space, the database can grow quickly, and result in performance degradation. Try to avoid long running read transactions.

  5. libmdbx is extraordinarily fast and provides minimal overhead for data access, so you should reconsider using brute force techniques and double check your code. On the one hand, in the case of libmdbx, a simple linear search may be more profitable than complex indexes. On the other hand, if you make something suboptimally, you can notice detrimentally only on sufficiently large data.

Comparison with other databases

For now please refer to chapter of "BoltDB comparison with other databases" which is also (mostly) applicable to libmdbx.

<!-- section-end --> <!-- section-begin improvements -->

Improvements beyond LMDB

libmdbx is superior to legendary LMDB in terms of features and reliability, not inferior in performance. In comparison to LMDB, libmdbx make things "just work" perfectly and out-of-the-box, not silently and catastrophically break down. The list below is pruned down to the improvements most notable and obvious from the user's point of view.

Added Features

  1. Keys could be more than 2 times longer than LMDB.

For DB with default page size libmdbx support keys up to 2022 bytes and up to 32742 bytes for 64K page size. LMDB allows key size up to 511 bytes and may silently loses data with large values.

  1. Up to 30% faster than LMDB in CRUD benchmarks.

Benchmarks of the in-tmpfs scenarios, that tests the speed of the engine itself, showned that libmdbx 10-20% faster than LMDB, and up to 30% faster when libmdbx compiled with specific build options which downgrades several runtime checks to be match with LMDB behaviour.

These and other results could be easily reproduced with ioArena just by make bench-quartet command, including comparisons with RockDB and WiredTiger.

  1. Automatic on-the-fly database size adjustment, both increment and reduction.

libmdbx manages the database size according to parameters specified by mdbx_env_set_geometry() function, ones include the growth step and the truncation threshold.

Unfortunately, on-the-fly database size adjustment doesn't work under Wine due to its internal limitations and unimplemented functions, i.e. the MDBX_UNABLE_EXTEND_MAPSIZE error will be returned.

  1. Automatic continuous zero-overhead database compactification.

During each commit libmdbx merges a freeing pages which adjacent with the unallocated area at the end of file, and then truncates unused space when a lot enough of.

  1. The same database format for 32- and 64-bit builds.

libmdbx database format depends only on the endianness but not on the bitness.

  1. LIFO policy for Garbage Collection recycling. This can significantly increase write performance due write-back disk cache up to several times in a best case scenario.

LIFO means that for reuse will be taken the latest becomes unused pages. Therefore the loop of database pages circulation becomes as short as possible. In other words, the set of pages, that are (over)written in memory and on disk during a series of write transactions, will be as small as possible. Thus creates ideal conditions for the battery-backed or flash-backed disk cache efficiency.

  1. Fast estimation of range query result volume, i.e. how many items can be found between a KEY1 and a KEY2. This is a prerequisite for build and/or optimize query execution plans.

libmdbx performs a rough estimate based on common B-tree pages of the paths from root to corresponding keys.

  1. mdbx_chk utility for database integrity check. Since version 0.9.1, the utility supports checking the database using any of the three meta pages and the ability to switch to it.

  2. Support for opening databases in the exclusive mode, including on a network share.

  3. Zero-length for keys and values.

  4. Ability to determine whether the particular data is on a dirty page or not, that allows to avoid copy-out before updates.

  5. Extended information of whole-database, sub-databases, transactions, readers enumeration.

libmdbx provides a lot of information, including dirty and leftover pages for a write transaction, reading lag and holdover space for read transactions.

  1. Extended update and delete operations.

libmdbx allows one at once with getting previous value and addressing the particular item from multi-value with the same key.

  1. Useful runtime options for tuning engine to application's requirements and use cases specific.

  2. Automated steady sync-to-disk upon several thresholds and/or timeout via cheap polling.

  3. Sequence generation and three persistent 64-bit markers.

  4. Handle-Slow-Readers callback to resolve a database full/overflow issues due to long-lived read transaction(s).

  5. Ability to determine whether the cursor is pointed to a key-value pair, to the first, to the last, or not set to anything.

Other fixes and specifics

  1. Fixed more than 10 significant errors, in particular: page leaks, wrong sub-database statistics, segfault in several conditions, nonoptimal page merge strategy, updating an existing record with a change in data size (including for multimap), etc.

  2. All cursors can be reused and should be closed explicitly, regardless ones were opened within a write or read transaction.

  3. Opening database handles are spared from race conditions and pre-opening is not needed.

  4. Returning MDBX_EMULTIVAL error in case of ambiguous update or delete.

  5. Guarantee of database integrity even in asynchronous unordered write-to-disk mode.

libmdbx propose additional trade-off by MDBX_SAFE_NOSYNC with append-like manner for updates, that avoids database corruption after a system crash contrary to LMDB. Nevertheless, the MDBX_UTTERLY_NOSYNC mode is available to match LMDB's behaviour for MDB_NOSYNC.

  1. On MacOS & iOS the fcntl(F_FULLFSYNC) syscall is used by default to synchronize data with the disk, as this is the only way to guarantee data durability in case of power failure. Unfortunately, in scenarios with high write intensity, the use of F_FULLFSYNC significantly degrades performance compared to LMDB, where the fsync() syscall is used. Therefore, libmdbx allows you to override this behavior by defining the MDBX_OSX_SPEED_INSTEADOF_DURABILITY=1 option while build the library.

  2. On Windows the LockFileEx() syscall is used for locking, since it allows place the database on network drives, and provides protection against incompetent user actions (aka poka-yoke). Therefore libmdbx may be a little lag in performance tests from LMDB where the named mutexes are used.

<!-- section-end --> <!-- section-begin history -->

History

Historically, libmdbx is a deeply revised and extended descendant of the Lightning Memory-Mapped Database. At first the development was carried out within the ReOpenLDAP project. About a year later libmdbx was separated into a standalone project, which was presented at Highload++ 2015 conference.

Since 2017 libmdbx is used in Fast Positive Tables, and development is funded by Positive Technologies.

Acknowledgments

Howard Chu hyc@openldap.org is the author of LMDB, from which originated the libmdbx in 2015.

Martin Hedenfalk martin@bzero.se is the author of btree.c code, which was used to begin development of LMDB.

<!-- section-end -->

Usage

<!-- section-begin usage -->

Currently, libmdbx is only available in a source code form. Packages support for common Linux distributions is planned in the future, since release the version 1.0.

Never use tarballs nor zips automatically provided by Github !

Please don't use tarballs nor zips which are automatically provided by Github. These archives do not contain version information and thus are unfit to build libmdbx. Instead of ones just clone the git repository, either download a tarball or zip with the properly amalgamated source core. Moreover, please vote for ability of disabling auto-creation such unsuitable archives.

Source code embedding

libmdbx provides two official ways for integration in source code form:

  1. Using the amalgamated source code.

The amalgamated source code includes all files required to build and use libmdbx, but not for testing libmdbx itself.

  1. Adding the complete original source code as a git submodule.

This allows you to build as libmdbx and testing tool. On the other hand, this way requires you to pull git tags, and use C++11 compiler for test tool.

Please, avoid using any other techniques. Otherwise, at least don't ask for support and don't name such chimeras libmdbx.

The amalgamated source code could be created from the original clone of git repository on Linux by executing make dist. As a result, the desired set of files will be formed in the dist subdirectory.

Building and Testing

Both amalgamated and original source code provides build through the use CMake or GNU Make with bash. All build ways are completely traditional and have minimal prerequirements like build-essential, i.e. the non-obsolete C/C++ compiler and a SDK for the target platform. Obviously you need building tools itself, i.e. git, cmake or GNU make with bash. For your convenience, make help and make options are also available for listing existing targets and build options respectively.

The only significant specificity is that git' tags are required to build from complete (not amalgamated) source codes. Executing git fetch --tags --force --prune is enough to get ones, or git fetch --unshallow --tags --prune --force after the Github's actions/checkout@v2 either set fetch-depth: 0 for it.

So just using CMake or GNU Make in your habitual manner and feel free to fill an issue or make pull request in the case something will be unexpected or broken down.

Testing

The amalgamated source code does not contain any tests for or several reasons. Please read the explanation and don't ask to alter this. So for testing libmdbx itself you need a full source code, i.e. the clone of a git repository, there is no option.

The full source code of libmdbx has a test subdirectory with minimalistic test "framework". Actually yonder is a source code of the mdbx_test – console utility which has a set of command-line options that allow construct and run a reasonable enough test scenarios. This test utility is intended for libmdbx's developers for testing library itself, but not for use by users. Therefore, only basic information is provided:

Anyway, no matter how thoroughly the libmdbx is tested, you should rely only on your own tests for a few reasons:

  1. Mostly of all use cases are unique. So it is no warranty that your use case was properly tested, even the libmdbx's tests engages stochastic approach.
  2. If there are problems, then your test on the one hand will help to verify whether you are using libmdbx correctly, on the other hand it will allow to reproduce the problem and insure against regression in a future.
  3. Actually you should rely on than you checked by yourself or take a risk.

Common important details

Build reproducibility

By default libmdbx track build time via MDBX_BUILD_TIMESTAMP build option and macro. So for a reproducible builds you should predefine/override it to known fixed string value. For instance:

Of course, in addition to this, your toolchain must ensure the reproducibility of builds. For more information please refer to reproducible-builds.org.

Containers

There are no special traits nor quirks if you use libmdbx ONLY inside the single container. But in a cross-container cases or with a host-container(s) mix the two major things MUST be guaranteed:

  1. Coherence of memory mapping content and unified page cache inside OS kernel for host and all container(s) operated with a DB. Basically this means must be only a single physical copy of each memory mapped DB' page in the system memory.

  2. Uniqueness of PID values and/or a common space for ones:

    • for POSIX systems: PID uniqueness for all processes operated with a DB. I.e. the --pid=host is required for run DB-aware processes inside Docker, either without host interaction a --pid=container:<name|id> with the same name/id.
    • for non-POSIX (i.e. Windows) systems: inter-visibility of processes handles. I.e. the OpenProcess(SYNCHRONIZE, ..., PID) must return reasonable error, including ERROR_ACCESS_DENIED, but not the ERROR_INVALID_PARAMETER as for an invalid/non-existent PID.

DSO/DLL unloading and destructors of Thread-Local-Storage objects

When building libmdbx as a shared library or use static libmdbx as a part of another dynamic library, it is advisable to make sure that your system ensures the correctness of the call destructors of Thread-Local-Storage objects when unloading dynamic libraries.

If this is not the case, then unloading a dynamic-link library with libmdbx code inside, can result in either a resource leak or a crash due to calling destructors from an already unloaded DSO/DLL object. The problem can only manifest in a multithreaded application, which makes the unloading of shared dynamic libraries with libmdbx code inside, after using libmdbx. It is known that TLS-destructors are properly maintained in the following cases:

Linux and other platforms with GNU Make

To build the library it is enough to execute make all in the directory of source code, and make check to execute the basic tests.

If the make installed on the system is not GNU Make, there will be a lot of errors from make when trying to build. In this case, perhaps you should use gmake instead of make, or even gnu-make, etc.

FreeBSD and related platforms

As a rule on BSD and it derivatives the default is to use Berkeley Make and Bash is not installed.

So you need to install the required components: GNU Make, Bash, C and C++ compilers compatible with GCC or CLANG. After that, to build the library, it is enough to execute gmake all (or make all) in the directory with source code, and gmake check (or make check) to run the basic tests.

Windows

For build libmdbx on Windows the original CMake and Microsoft Visual Studio 2019 are recommended. Please use the recent versions of CMake, Visual Studio and Windows SDK to avoid troubles with C11 support and alignas() feature.

For build by MinGW the 10.2 or recent version coupled with a modern CMake are required. So it is recommended to use chocolatey to install and/or update the ones.

Another ways to build is potentially possible but not supported and will not. The CMakeLists.txt or GNUMakefile scripts will probably need to be modified accordingly. Using other methods do not forget to add the ntdll.lib to linking.

It should be noted that in libmdbx was efforts to avoid runtime dependencies from CRT and other MSVC libraries. For this is enough to pass the -DMDBX_WITHOUT_MSVC_CRT:BOOL=ON option during configure by CMake.

An example of running a basic test script can be found in the CI-script for AppVeyor. To run the long stochastic test scenario, bash is required, and such testing is recommended with placing the test data on the RAM-disk.

Windows Subsystem for Linux

libmdbx could be used in WSL2 but NOT in WSL1 environment. This is a consequence of the fundamental shortcomings of WSL1 and cannot be fixed. To avoid data loss, libmdbx returns the ENOLCK (37, "No record locks available") error when opening the database in a WSL1 environment.

MacOS

Current native build tools for MacOS include GNU Make, CLANG and an outdated version of Bash. Therefore, to build the library, it is enough to run make all in the directory with source code, and run make check to execute the base tests. If something goes wrong, it is recommended to install Homebrew and try again.

To run the long stochastic test scenario, you will need to install the current (not outdated) version of Bash. To do this, we recommend that you install Homebrew and then execute brew install bash.

Android

We recommend using CMake to build libmdbx for Android. Please refer to the official guide.

iOS

To build libmdbx for iOS, we recommend using CMake with the "toolchain file" from the ios-cmake project.

<!-- section-end -->

API description

Please refer to the online libmdbx API reference and/or see the mdbx.h++ and mdbx.h headers.

<!-- section-begin bindings -->

Bindings

RuntimeRepoAuthor
Scalamdbx4sDavid Bouyssié
Haskelllibmdbx-hsFrancisco Vallarino
NodeJS, Denolmdbx-jsKris Zyp
NodeJSnode-mdbxСергей Федотов
Rubyruby-mdbxMahlon E. Smith
Gomdbx-goAlex Sharov
NimNimDBXJens Alfke
Rustlibmdbx-rsArtem Vorotnikov
Rustmdbxgcxfd
JavamdbxjniCastor Technologies
Python (draft)python-bindings branchNoel Kuntze
.NET (obsolete)mdbx.NETJerry Wang
<!-- section-end -->
<!-- section-begin performance -->

Performance comparison

All benchmarks were done in 2015 by IOArena and multiple scripts runs on Lenovo Carbon-2 laptop, i7-4600U 2.1 GHz (2 physical cores, 4 HyperThreading cores), 8 Gb RAM, SSD SAMSUNG MZNTD512HAGL-000L1 (DXT23L0Q) 512 Gb.

Integral performance

Here showed sum of performance metrics in 3 benchmarks:

Reasons why asynchronous mode isn't benchmarked here:

  1. It doesn't make sense as it has to be done with DB engines, oriented for keeping data in memory e.g. Tarantool, Redis), etc.

  2. Performance gap is too high to compare in any meaningful way.

Comparison #1: Integral Performance

Read Scalability

Summary performance with concurrent read/search queries in 1-2-4-8 threads on the machine with 4 logical CPUs in HyperThreading mode (i.e. actually 2 physical CPU cores).

Comparison #2: Read Scalability

Sync-write mode

10,000 transactions in sync-write mode. In case of a crash all data is consistent and conforms to the last successful transaction. The fdatasync syscall is used after each write transaction in this mode.

In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2 inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on an empty database and after full run the database contains 10,000 small key-value records.

Comparison #3: Sync-write mode

Lazy-write mode

100,000 transactions in lazy-write mode. In case of a crash all data is consistent and conforms to the one of last successful transactions, but transactions after it will be lost. Other DB engines use WAL or transaction journal for that, which in turn depends on order of operations in the journaled filesystem. libmdbx doesn't use WAL and hands I/O operations to filesystem and OS kernel (mmap).

In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2 inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on an empty database and after full run the database contains 100,000 small key-value records.

Comparison #4: Lazy-write mode

Async-write mode

1,000,000 transactions in async-write mode. In case of a crash all data is consistent and conforms to the one of last successful transactions, but lost transaction count is much higher than in lazy-write mode. All DB engines in this mode do as little writes as possible on persistent storage. libmdbx uses msync(MS_ASYNC) in this mode.

In the benchmark each transaction contains combined CRUD operations (2 inserts, 1 read, 1 update, 1 delete). Benchmark starts on an empty database and after full run the database contains 10,000 small key-value records.

Comparison #5: Async-write mode

Cost comparison

Summary of used resources during lazy-write mode benchmarks:

ForestDB is excluded because benchmark showed it's resource consumption for each resource (CPU, IOPs) much higher than other engines which prevents to meaningfully compare it with them.

All benchmark data is gathered by getrusage() syscall and by scanning the data directory.

Comparison #6: Cost comparison

<!-- section-end -->

This is a mirror of the origin repository that was moved to gitflic.ru because of discriminatory restrictions for Russian Crimea.