Awesome
FluidX3D
The fastest and most memory efficient lattice Boltzmann CFD software, running on all GPUs and CPUs via OpenCL. Free for non-commercial use.
<a href="https://youtu.be/-MkRBeQkLk8"><img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/o3TPN142HxM/maxresdefault.jpg" width="50%"></img></a><a href="https://youtu.be/oC6U1M0Fsug"><img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/oC6U1M0Fsug/maxresdefault.jpg" width="50%"></img></a><br> <a href="https://youtu.be/XOfXHgP4jnQ"><img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/XOfXHgP4jnQ/maxresdefault.jpg" width="50%"></img></a><a href="https://youtu.be/K5eKxzklXDA"><img src="https://img.youtube.com/vi/K5eKxzklXDA/maxresdefault.jpg" width="50%"></img></a> (click on images to show videos on YouTube)
<details><summary>Update History</summary>- v1.0 (04.08.2022) changes (public release)
- public release
- v1.1 (29.09.2022) changes (GPU voxelization)
- added solid voxelization on GPU (slow algorithm)
- added tool to print current camera position (key <kbd>G</kbd>)
- minor bug fix (workaround for Intel iGPU driver bug with triangle rendering)
- v1.2 (24.10.2022) changes (force/torque compuatation)
- added functions to compute force/torque on objects
- added function to translate Mesh
- added Stokes drag validation setup
- v1.3 (10.11.2022) changes (minor bug fixes)
- added unit conversion functions for torque
FORCE_FIELD
andVOLUME_FORCE
can now be used independently- minor bug fix (workaround for AMD legacy driver bug with binary number literals)
- v1.4 (14.12.2022) changes (Linux graphics)
- complete rewrite of C++ graphics library to minimize API dependencies
- added interactive graphics mode on Linux with X11
- fixed streamline visualization bug in 2D
- v2.0 (09.01.2023) changes (multi-GPU upgrade)
- added (cross-vendor) multi-GPU support on a single node (PC/laptop/server)
- v2.1 (15.01.2023) changes (fast voxelization)
- made solid voxelization on GPU lightning fast (new algorithm, from minutes to milliseconds)
- v2.2 (20.01.2023) changes (velocity voxelization)
- added option to voxelize moving/rotating geometry on GPU, with automatic velocity initialization for each grid point based on center of rotation, linear velocity and rotational velocity
- cells that are converted from solid->fluid during re-voxelization now have their DDFs properly initialized
- added option to not auto-scale mesh during
read_stl(...)
, with negativesize
parameter - added kernel for solid boundary rendering with marching-cubes
- v2.3 (30.01.2023) changes (particles)
- added particles with immersed-boundary method (either passive or 2-way-coupled, only supported with single-GPU)
- minor optimization to GPU voxelization algorithm (workgroup threads outside mesh bounding-box return after ray-mesh intersections have been found)
- displayed GPU memory allocation size is now fully accurate
- fixed bug in
write_line()
function insrc/utilities.hpp
- removed
.exe
file extension for Linux/macOS
- v2.4 (11.03.2023) changes (UI improvements)
- added a help menu with key <kbd>H</kbd> that shows keyboard/mouse controls, visualization settings and simulation stats
- improvements to keyboard/mouse control (<kbd>+</kbd>/<kbd>-</kbd> for zoom, <kbd>mouseclick</kbd> frees/locks cursor)
- added suggestion of largest possible grid resolution if resolution is set larger than memory allows
- minor optimizations in multi-GPU communication (insignificant performance difference)
- fixed bug in temperature equilibrium function for temperature extension
- fixed erroneous double literal for Intel iGPUs in skybox color functions
- fixed bug in make.sh where multi-GPU device IDs would not get forwarded to the executable
- minor bug fixes in graphics engine (free cursor not centered during rotation, labels in VR mode)
- fixed bug in
LBM::voxelize_stl()
size parameter standard initialization
- v2.5 (11.04.2023) changes (raytracing overhaul)
- implemented light absorption in fluid for raytracing graphics (no performance impact)
- improved raytracing framerate when camera is inside fluid
- fixed skybox pole flickering artifacts
- fixed bug where moving objects during re-voxelization would leave an erroneous trail of solid grid cells behind
- v2.6 (16.04.2023) changes (Intel Arc patch)
- patched OpenCL issues of Intel Arc GPUs: now VRAM allocations >4GB are possible and correct VRAM capacity is reported
- v2.7 (29.05.2023) changes (visualization upgrade)
- added slice visualization (key <kbd>2</kbd> / key <kbd>3</kbd> modes, then switch through slice modes with key <kbd>T</kbd>, move slice with keys <kbd>Q</kbd>/<kbd>E</kbd>)
- made flag wireframe / solid surface visualization kernels toggleable with key <kbd>1</kbd>
- added surface pressure visualization (key <kbd>1</kbd> when
FORCE_FIELD
is enabled andlbm.calculate_force_on_boundaries();
is called) - added binary
.vtk
export function for meshes withlbm.write_mesh_to_vtk(Mesh* mesh);
- added
time_step_multiplicator
forintegrate_particles()
function in PARTICLES extension - made correction of wrong memory reporting on Intel Arc more robust
- fixed bug in
write_file()
template functions - reverted back to separate
cl::Context
for each OpenCL device, as the shared Context otherwise would allocate extra VRAM on all other unused Nvidia GPUs - removed Debug and x86 configurations from Visual Studio solution file (one less complication for compiling)
- fixed bug that particles could get too close to walls and get stuck, or leave the fluid phase (added boundary force)
- v2.8 (24.06.2023) changes (documentation + polish)
- finally added more documentation
- cleaned up all sample setups in
setup.cpp
for more beginner-friendliness, and added required extensions indefines.hpp
as comments to all setups - improved loading of composite
.stl
geometries, by adding an option to omit automatic mesh repositioning, added more functionality toMesh
struct inutilities.hpp
- added
uint3 resolution(float3 box_aspect_ratio, uint memory)
function to compute simulation box resolution based on box aspect ratio and VRAM occupation in MB - added
bool lbm.graphics.next_frame(...)
function to export images for a specified video length in themain_setup
compute loop - added
VIS_...
macros to ease setting visualization modes in headless graphics mode inlbm.graphics.visualization_modes
- simulation box dimensions are now automatically made equally divisible by domains for multi-GPU simulations
- fixed Info/Warning/Error message formatting for loading files and made Info/Warning/Error message labels colored
- added Ahmed body setup as an example on how body forces and drag coefficient are computed
- added Cessna 172 and Bell 222 setups to showcase loading composite .stl geometries and revoxelization of moving parts
- added optional semi-transparent rendering mode (
#define GRAPHICS_TRANSPARENCY 0.7f
indefines.hpp
) - fixed flickering of streamline visualization in interactive graphics
- improved smooth positioning of streamlines in slice mode
- fixed bug where
mass
andmassex
inSURFACE
extension were also allocated in CPU RAM (not required) - fixed bug in Q-criterion rendering of halo data in multi-GPU mode, reduced gap width between domains
- removed shared memory optimization from mesh voxelization kernel, as it crashes on Nvidia GPUs with new GPU drivers and is incompatible with old OpenCL 1.0 GPUs
- fixed raytracing attenuation color when no surface is at the simulation box walls with periodic boundaries
- v2.9 (31.07.2023) changes (multithreading)
- added cross-platform
parallel_for
implementation inutilities.hpp
usingstd::threads
- significantly (>4x) faster simulation startup with multithreaded geometry initialization and sanity checks
- faster
calculate_force_on_object()
andcalculate_torque_on_object()
functions with multithreading - added total runtime and LBM runtime to
lbm.write_status()
- fixed bug in voxelization ray direction for re-voxelizing rotating objects
- fixed bug in
Mesh::get_bounding_box_size()
- fixed bug in
print_message()
function inutilities.hpp
- added cross-platform
- v2.10 (05.11.2023) changes (frustrum culling)
- improved rasterization performance via frustrum culling when only part of the simulation box is visible
- improved switching between centered/free camera mode
- refactored OpenCL rendering library
- unit conversion factors are now automatically printed in console when
units.set_m_kg_s(...)
is used - faster startup time for FluidX3D benchmark
- miner bug fix in
voxelize_mesh(...)
kernel - fixed bug in
shading(...)
- replaced slow (in multithreading)
std::rand()
function with standard C99 LCG - more robust correction of wrong VRAM capacity reporting on Intel Arc GPUs
- fixed some minor compiler warnings
- v2.11 (07.12.2023) changes (improved Linux graphics)
- interactive graphics on Linux are now in fullscreen mode too, fully matching Windows
- made CPU/GPU buffer initialization significantly faster with
std::fill
andenqueueFillBuffer
(overall ~8% faster simulation startup) - added operating system info to OpenCL device driver version printout
- fixed flickering with frustrum culling at very small field of view
- fixed bug where rendered/exported frame was not updated when
visualization_modes
changed
- v2.12 (18.01.2024) changes (faster startup)
- ~3x faster source code compiling on Linux using multiple CPU cores if
make
is installed - significantly faster simulation initialization (~40% single-GPU, ~15% multi-GPU)
- minor bug fix in
Memory_Container::reset()
function
- ~3x faster source code compiling on Linux using multiple CPU cores if
- v2.13 (11.02.2024) changes (improved .vtk export)
- data in exported
.vtk
files is now automatically converted to SI units - ~2x faster
.vtk
export with multithreading - added unit conversion functions for
TEMPERATURE
extension - fixed graphical artifacts with axis-aligned camera in raytracing
- fixed
get_exe_path()
for macOS - fixed X11 multi-monitor issues on Linux
- workaround for Nvidia driver bug:
enqueueFillBuffer
is broken for large buffers on Nvidia GPUs - fixed slow numeric drift issues caused by
-cl-fast-relaxed-math
- fixed wrong Maximum Allocation Size reporting in
LBM::write_status()
- fixed missing scaling of coordinates to SI units in
LBM::write_mesh_to_vtk()
- data in exported
- v2.14 (03.03.2024) changes (visualization upgrade)
- coloring can now be switched between velocity/density/temperature with key <kbd>Z</kbd>
- uniform improved color palettes for velocity/density/temperature visualization
- color scale with automatic unit conversion can now be shown with key <kbd>H</kbd>
- slice mode for field visualization now draws fully filled-in slices instead of only lines for velocity vectors
- shading in
VIS_FLAG_SURFACE
andVIS_PHI_RASTERIZE
modes is smoother now make.sh
now automatically detects operating system and X11 support on Linux and only runs FluidX3D if last compilation was successful- fixed compiler warnings on Android
- fixed
make.sh
failing on some systems due to nonstandard interpreter path - fixed that
make
would not compile with multiple cores on some systems
- v2.15 (09.04.2024) changes (framerate boost)
- eliminated one frame memory copy and one clear frame operation in rendering chain, for 20-70% higher framerate on both Windows and Linux
- enabled
g++
compiler optimizations for faster startup and higher rendering framerate - fixed bug in multithreaded sanity checks
- fixed wrong unit conversion for thermal expansion coefficient
- fixed density to pressure conversion in LBM units
- fixed bug that raytracing kernel could lock up simulation
- fixed minor visual artifacts with raytracing
- fixed that console sometimes was not cleared before
INTERACTIVE_GRAPHICS_ASCII
rendering starts
- v2.16 (02.05.2024) changes (bug fixes)
- simplified 10% faster marching-cubes implementation with 1D interpolation on edges instead of 3D interpolation, allowing to get rid of edge table
- added faster, simplified marching-cubes variant for solid surface rendering where edges are always halfway between grid cells
- refactoring in OpenCL rendering kernels
- fixed that voxelization failed in Intel OpenCL CPU Runtime due to array out-of-bounds access
- fixed that voxelization did not always produce binary identical results in multi-GPU compared to single-GPU
- fixed that velocity voxelization failed for free surface simulations
- fixed terrible performance on ARM GPUs by macro-replacing fused-multiply-add (
fma
) witha*b+c
- fixed that <kbd>Y</kbd>/<kbd>Z</kbd> keys were incorrect for
QWERTY
keyboard layout in Linux - fixed that free camera movement speed in help overlay was not updated in stationary image when scrolling
- fixed that cursor would sometimes flicker when scrolling on trackpads with Linux-X11 interactive graphics
- fixed flickering of interactive rendering with multi-GPU when camera is not moved
- fixed missing
XInitThreads()
call that could crash Linux interactive graphics on some systems - fixed z-fighting between
graphics_rasterize_phi()
andgraphics_flags_mc()
kernels
- v2.17 (05.06.2024) changes (unlimited domain resolution)
- domains are no longer limited to 4.29 billion (2³², 1624³) grid cells or 225 GB memory; if more are used, the OpenCL code will automatically compile with 64-bit indexing
- new, faster raytracing-based field visualization for single-GPU simulations
- added GPU Driver and OpenCL Runtime installation instructions to documentation
- refactored
INTERACTIVE_GRAPHICS_ASCII
- fixed memory leak in destructors of
floatN
,floatNxN
,doubleN
,doubleNxN
(all unused) - made camera movement/rotation/zoom behavior independent of framerate
- fixed that
smart_device_selection()
would print a wrong warning if device reports 0 MHz clock speed
- v2.18 (21.07.2024) changes (more bug fixes)
- added support for high refresh rate monitors on Linux
- more compact OpenCL Runtime installation scripts in Documentation
- driver/runtime installation instructions will now be printed to console if no OpenCL devices are available
- added domain information to
LBM::write_status()
- added
LBM::index
function foruint3
input parameter - fixed that very large simulations sometimes wouldn't render properly by increasing maximum render distance from 10k to 2.1M
- fixed mouse input stuttering at high screen refresh rate on Linux
- fixed graphical artifacts in free surface raytracing on Intel CPU Runtime for OpenCL
- fixed runtime estimation printed in console for setups with multiple
lbm.run(...)
calls - fixed density oscillations in sample setups (too large
lbm_u
) - fixed minor graphical artifacts in
raytrace_phi()
- fixed minor graphical artifacts in
ray_grid_traverse_sum()
- fixed wrong printed time step count on raindrop sample setup
- v2.19 (07.09.2024) changes (camera splines)
- the camera can now fly along a smooth path through a list of provided keyframe camera placements, using Catmull-Rom splines
- more accurate remaining runtime estimation that includes time spent on rendering
- enabled FP16S memory compression by default
- printed camera placement using key <kbd>G</kbd> is now formatted for easier copy/paste
- added benchmark chart in Readme using mermaid gantt chart
- placed memory allocation info during simulation startup at better location
- fixed threading conflict between
INTERACTIVE_GRAPHICS
andlbm.graphics.write_frame();
- fixed maximum buffer allocation size limit for AMD GPUs and in Intel CPU Runtime for OpenCL
- fixed wrong
Re<Re_max
info printout for 2D simulations - minor fix in
bandwidth_bytes_per_cell_device()
- v3.0 (16.11.2024) changes (larger CPU/iGPU simulations)
- reduced memory footprint on CPUs and iGPU from 72 to 55 Bytes/cell (fused OpenCL host+device buffers for
rho
/u
/flags
), allowing 31% higher resolution in the same RAM capacity - faster hardware-supported and faster fallback emulation atomic floating-point addition for
PARTICLES
extension - hardened
calculate_f_eq()
against bad user input forD2Q9
- fixed velocity voxelization for overlapping geometry with different velocity
- fixed Remaining Time printout during paused simulation
- fixed CPU/GPU memory printout for CPU/iGPU simulations
- reduced memory footprint on CPUs and iGPU from 72 to 55 Bytes/cell (fused OpenCL host+device buffers for
How to get started?
Read the FluidX3D Documentation!
Compute Features - Getting the Memory Problem under Control
-
<details><summary><a name="cfd-model"></a>CFD model: lattice Boltzmann method (LBM)</summary>
-
streaming (part 2/2)<p align="center"><i>f</i><sub>0</sub><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>) = <i>f</i><sub>0</sub>(<i>x</i>, <i>t</i>)<br><i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>) = <i>f</i><sub>(<i>t</i>%2 ? <i>i</i> : (<i>i</i>%2 ? <i>i</i>+1 : <i>i</i>-1))</sub>(<i>i</i>%2 ? <i>x</i> : <i>x</i>-<i>e<sub>i</sub></i>, <i>t</i>) for <i>i</i> ∈ [1, <i>q</i>-1]</p>
-
collision<p align="center"><i>ρ</i>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>) = (Σ<sub><i>i</i></sub> <i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>)) + 1<br><br><i>u</i>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>) = <sup>1</sup>∕<sub><i>ρ</i>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>)</sub> Σ<sub><i>i</i></sub> <i>c<sub>i</sub></i> <i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>)<br><br><i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>eq-shifted</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>) = <i>w<sub>i</sub></i> <i>ρ</i> · (<sup>(<i>u</i><sub>°</sub><i>c<sub>i</sub></i>)<sup>2</sup></sup>∕<sub>(2<i>c</i><sup>4</sup>)</sub> - <sup>(<i>u</i><sub>°</sub><i>u</i>)</sup>∕<sub>(2c<sup>2</sup>)</sub> + <sup>(<i>u</i><sub>°</sub><i>c<sub>i</sub></i>)</sup>∕<sub><i>c</i><sup>2</sup></sub>) + <i>w<sub>i</sub></i> (<i>ρ</i>-1)<br><br><i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>, <i>t</i>+Δ<i>t</i>) = <i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>) + <i>Ω<sub>i</sub></i>(<i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>), <i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>eq-shifted</sup>(<i>x</i>,<i>t</i>), <i>τ</i>)</p>
-
streaming (part 1/2)<p align="center"><i>f</i><sub>0</sub>(<i>x</i>, <i>t</i>+Δ<i>t</i>) = <i>f</i><sub>0</sub><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>, <i>t</i>+Δ<i>t</i>)<br><i>f</i><sub>(<i>t</i>%2 ? (<i>i</i>%2 ? <i>i</i>+1 : <i>i</i>-1) : <i>i</i>)</sub>(<i>i</i>%2 ? <i>x</i>+<i>e<sub>i</sub></i> : <i>x</i>, <i>t</i>+Δ<i>t</i>) = <i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>temp</sup>(<i>x</i>, <i>t</i>+Δ<i>t</i>) for <i>i</i> ∈ [1, <i>q</i>-1]</p>
-
<details><summary>variables and <a href="https://doi.org/10.15495/EPub_UBT_00005400">notation</a></summary>
</details>variable SI units defining equation description <i>x</i> m <i>x</i> = (x,y,z)<sup>T</sup> 3D position in Cartesian coordinates <i>t</i> s - time <i>ρ</i> <sup>kg</sup>∕<sub>m³</sub> <i>ρ</i> = (Σ<sub><i>i</i></sub> <i>f<sub>i</sub></i>)+1 mass density of fluid <i>p</i> <sup>kg</sup>∕<sub>m s²</sub> <i>p</i> = <i>c</i>² <i>ρ</i> pressure of fluid <i>u</i> <sup>m</sup>∕<sub>s</sub> <i>u</i> = <sup>1</sup>∕<sub><i>ρ</i></sub> Σ<sub><i>i</i></sub> <i>c<sub>i</sub></i> <i>f<sub>i</sub></i> velocity of fluid <i>ν</i> <sup>m²</sup>∕<sub>s</sub> <i>ν</i> = <sup><i>μ</i></sup>∕<sub><i>ρ</i></sub> kinematic shear viscosity of fluid <i>μ</i> <sup>kg</sup>∕<sub>m s</sub> <i>μ</i> = <i>ρ</i> <i>ν</i> dynamic viscosity of fluid <i>f<sub>i</sub></i> <sup>kg</sup>∕<sub>m³</sub> - shifted density distribution functions (DDFs) Δ<i>x</i> m Δ<i>x</i> = 1 lattice constant (in LBM units) Δ<i>t</i> s Δ<i>t</i> = 1 simulation time step (in LBM units) <i>c</i> <sup>m</sup>∕<sub>s</sub> <i>c</i> = <sup>1</sup>∕<sub>√3</sub> <sup>Δ<i>x</i></sup>∕<sub>Δ<i>t</i></sub> lattice speed of sound (in LBM units) <i>i</i> 1 0 ≤ <i>i</i> < <i>q</i> LBM streaming direction index <i>q</i> 1 <i>q</i> ∈ { 9,15,19,27 } number of LBM streaming directions <i>e<sub>i</sub></i> m D2Q9 / D3Q15/19/27 LBM streaming directions <i>c<sub>i</sub></i> <sup>m</sup>∕<sub>s</sub> <i>c<sub>i</sub></i> = <sup><i>e<sub>i</sub></i></sup>∕<sub>Δ<i>t</i></sub> LBM streaming velocities <i>w<sub>i</sub></i> 1 Σ<sub><i>i</i></sub> <i>w<sub>i</sub></i> = 1 LBM velocity set weights <i>Ω<sub>i</sub></i> <sup>kg</sup>∕<sub>m³</sub> SRT or TRT LBM collision operator <i>τ</i> s <i>τ</i> = <sup><i>ν</i></sup>∕<sub><i>c</i>²</sub> + <sup>Δ<i>t</i></sup>∕<sub>2</sub> LBM relaxation time -
velocity sets: D2Q9, D3Q15, D3Q19 (default), D3Q27
-
collision operators: single-relaxation-time (SRT/BGK) (default), two-relaxation-time (TRT)
-
DDF-shifting and other algebraic optimization to minimize round-off error
-
-
<details><summary><a name="vram-footprint"></a>optimized to minimize VRAM footprint to 1/6 of other LBM codes</summary>
-
traditional LBM (D3Q19) with FP64 requires ~344 Bytes/cell<br>
- 🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟧🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟨🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥🟥<br>(density 🟧, velocity 🟦, flags 🟨, 2 copies of DDFs 🟩/🟥; each square = 1 Byte)
- allows for 3 Million cells per 1 GB VRAM
-
FluidX3D (D3Q19) requires only 55 Bytes/cell with Esoteric-Pull+FP16<br>
-
🟧🟧🟧🟧🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦🟨🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩<br>(density 🟧, velocity 🟦, flags 🟨, DDFs 🟩; each square = 1 Byte)
-
allows for 19 Million cells per 1 GB VRAM
-
in-place streaming with Esoteric-Pull: eliminates redundant copy of density distribution functions (DDFs) in memory; almost cuts memory demand in half and slightly increases performance due to implicit bounce-back boundaries; offers optimal memory access patterns for single-cell in-place streaming
-
decoupled arithmetic precision (FP32) and memory precision (FP32 or FP16S or FP16C): all arithmetic is done in FP32 for compatibility on all hardware, but DDFs in memory can be compressed to FP16S or FP16C: almost cuts memory demand in half again and almost doubles performance, without impacting overall accuracy for most setups
-
<details><summary>only 8 flag bits per lattice point (can be used independently / at the same time)</summary>
TYPE_S
(stationary or moving) solid boundariesTYPE_E
equilibrium boundaries (inflow/outflow)TYPE_T
temperature boundariesTYPE_F
free surface (fluid)TYPE_I
free surface (interface)TYPE_G
free surface (gas)TYPE_X
remaining for custom use or further extensionsTYPE_Y
remaining for custom use or further extensions
-
-
large cost saving: comparison of maximum single-GPU grid resolution for D3Q19 LBM
GPU VRAM capacity 1 GB 2 GB 3 GB 4 GB 6 GB 8 GB 10 GB 11 GB 12 GB 16 GB 20 GB 24 GB 32 GB 40 GB 48 GB 64 GB 80 GB 94 GB 128 GB 192 GB 256 GB approximate GPU price $25<br>GT 210 $25<br>GTX 950 $12<br>GTX 1060 $50<br>GT 730 $35<br>GTX 1060 $70<br>RX 470 $500<br>RTX 3080 $240<br>GTX 1080 Ti $75<br>Tesla M40 $75<br>Instinct MI25 $900<br>RX 7900 XT $205<br>Tesla P40 $600<br>Instinct MI60 $5500<br>A100 $2400<br>RTX 8000 $10k<br>Instinct MI210 $11k<br>A100 >$40k<br>H100 NVL ?<br>GPU Max 1550 ~$10k<br>MI300X - traditional LBM (FP64) 144³ 182³ 208³ 230³ 262³ 288³ 312³ 322³ 330³ 364³ 392³ 418³ 460³ 494³ 526³ 578³ 624³ 658³ 730³ 836³ 920³ FluidX3D (FP32/FP32) 224³ 282³ 322³ 354³ 406³ 448³ 482³ 498³ 512³ 564³ 608³ 646³ 710³ 766³ 814³ 896³ 966³ 1018³ 1130³ 1292³ 1422³ FluidX3D (FP32/FP16) 266³ 336³ 384³ 424³ 484³ 534³ 574³ 594³ 610³ 672³ 724³ 770³ 848³ 912³ 970³ 1068³ 1150³ 1214³ 1346³ 1540³ 1624³
-
-
<details><summary><a name="multi-gpu"></a>cross-vendor multi-GPU support on a single computer/server</summary>
- domain decomposition allows pooling VRAM from multiple GPUs for much larger grid resolution
- GPUs don't have to be identical (<a href="https://youtu.be/PscbxGVs52o">not even from the same vendor</a>), but similar VRAM capacity/bandwidth is recommended
- domain communication architecture (simplified)
++ .-----------------------------------------------------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 0 | ++ ++ | LBM Domain 0 | ++ ++ '-----------------------------------------------------------------' ++ ++ | selective /|\ ++ ++ \|/ in-VRAM copy | ++ ++ .-------------------------------------------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 0 - Transfer Buffer 0 | ++ ++ '-------------------------------------------------------' ++ !! | PCIe /|\ !! !! \|/ copy | !! @@ .-------------------------. .-------------------------. @@ @@ | CPU - Transfer Buffer 0 | | CPU - Transfer Buffer 1 | @@ @@ '-------------------------'\ /'-------------------------' @@ @@ pointer X swap @@ @@ .-------------------------./ \.-------------------------. @@ @@ | CPU - Transfer Buffer 1 | | CPU - Transfer Buffer 0 | @@ @@ '-------------------------' '-------------------------' @@ !! /|\ PCIe | !! !! | copy \|/ !! ++ .-------------------------------------------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 1 - Transfer Buffer 1 | ++ ++ '-------------------------------------------------------' ++ ++ /|\ selective | ++ ++ | in-VRAM copy \|/ ++ ++ .-----------------------------------------------------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 1 | ++ ++ | LBM Domain 1 | ++ ++ '-----------------------------------------------------------------' ++ ## | ## ## domain synchronization barrier ## ## | ## || -------------------------------------------------------------> time ||
- domain communication architecture (detailed)
++ .-----------------------------------------------------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 0 | ++ ++ | LBM Domain 0 | ++ ++ '-----------------------------------------------------------------' ++ ++ | selective in- /|\ | selective in- /|\ | selective in- /|\ ++ ++ \|/ VRAM copy (X) | \|/ VRAM copy (Y) | \|/ VRAM copy (Z) | ++ ++ .---------------------.---------------------.---------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 0 - TB 0X+ | GPU 0 - TB 0Y+ | GPU 0 - TB 0Z+ | ++ ++ | GPU 0 - TB 0X- | GPU 0 - TB 0Y- | GPU 0 - TB 0Z- | ++ ++ '---------------------'---------------------'---------------------' ++ !! | PCIe /|\ | PCIe /|\ | PCIe /|\ !! !! \|/ copy | \|/ copy | \|/ copy | !! @@ .---------. .---------.---------. .---------.---------. .---------. @@ @@ | CPU 0X+ | | CPU 1X- | CPU 0Y+ | | CPU 3Y- | CPU 0Z+ | | CPU 5Z- | @@ @@ | CPU 0X- | | CPU 2X+ | CPU 0Y- | | CPU 4Y+ | CPU 0Z- | | CPU 6Z+ | @@ @@ '---------\ /---------'---------\ /---------'---------\ /---------' @@ @@ pointer X swap (X) pointer X swap (Y) pointer X swap (Z) @@ @@ .---------/ \---------.---------/ \---------.---------/ \---------. @@ @@ | CPU 1X- | | CPU 0X+ | CPU 3Y- | | CPU 0Y+ | CPU 5Z- | | CPU 0Z+ | @@ @@ | CPU 2X+ | | CPU 0X- | CPU 4Y+ | | CPU 0Y- | CPU 6Z+ | | CPU 0Z- | @@ @@ '---------' '---------'---------' '---------'---------' '---------' @@ !! /|\ PCIe | /|\ PCIe | /|\ PCIe | !! !! | copy \|/ | copy \|/ | copy \|/ !! ++ .--------------------..---------------------..--------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 1 - TB 1X- || GPU 3 - TB 3Y- || GPU 5 - TB 5Z- | ++ ++ :====================::=====================::====================: ++ ++ | GPU 2 - TB 2X+ || GPU 4 - TB 4Y+ || GPU 6 - TB 6Z+ | ++ ++ '--------------------''---------------------''--------------------' ++ ++ /|\ selective in- | /|\ selective in- | /|\ selective in- | ++ ++ | VRAM copy (X) \|/ | VRAM copy (Y) \|/ | VRAM copy (Z) \|/ ++ ++ .--------------------..---------------------..--------------------. ++ ++ | GPU 1 || GPU 3 || GPU 5 | ++ ++ | LBM Domain 1 || LBM Domain 3 || LBM Domain 5 | ++ ++ :====================::=====================::====================: ++ ++ | GPU 2 || GPU 4 || GPU 6 | ++ ++ | LBM Domain 2 || LBM Domain 4 || LBM Domain 6 | ++ ++ '--------------------''---------------------''--------------------' ++ ## | | | ## ## | domain synchronization barriers | ## ## | | | ## || -------------------------------------------------------------> time ||
- <details><summary><a name="performance"></a>peak performance on GPUs (datacenter/gaming/professional/laptop)</summary> </details>
-
<details><summary><a name="extensions"></a>powerful model extensions</summary>
- boundary types
- stationary mid-grid bounce-back boundaries (stationary solid boundaries)
- moving mid-grid bounce-back boundaries (moving solid boundaries)
- equilibrium boundaries (non-reflective inflow/outflow)
- temperature boundaries (fixed temperature)
- global force per volume (Guo forcing), can be modified on-the-fly
- local force per volume (force field)
- optional computation of forces from the fluid on solid boundaries
- state-of-the-art free surface LBM (FSLBM) implementation:
- volume-of-fluid model
- fully analytic PLIC for efficient curvature calculation
- improved mass conservation
- ultra efficient implementation with only 4 kernels additionally to
stream_collide()
kernel
- thermal LBM to simulate thermal convection
- D3Q7 subgrid for thermal DDFs
- in-place streaming with Esoteric-Pull for thermal DDFs
- optional FP16S or FP16C compression for thermal DDFs with DDF-shifting
- Smagorinsky-Lilly subgrid turbulence LES model to keep simulations with very large Reynolds number stable <p align="center"><i>Π<sub>αβ</sub></i> = Σ<sub><i>i</i></sub> <i>e<sub>iα</sub></i> <i>e<sub>iβ</sub></i> (<i>f<sub>i</sub></i> - <i>f<sub>i</sub></i><sup>eq-shifted</sup>)<br><br>Q = Σ<sub><i>αβ</i></sub> <i>Π<sub>αβ</sub></i><sup>2</sup><br> ______________________<br>τ = ½ (τ<sub>0</sub> + √ τ<sub>0</sub><sup>2</sup> + <sup>(16√2)</sup>∕<sub>(<i>3π</i><sup>2</sup>)</sub> <sup>√Q</sup>∕<sub><i>ρ</i></sub> )</p>
- particles with immersed-boundary method (either passive or 2-way-coupled, single-GPU only)
- boundary types
Solving the Visualization Problem
- FluidX3D can do simulations so large that storing the volumetric data for later rendering becomes unmanageable (like 120GB for a single frame, hundreds of TeraByte for a video)
- instead, FluidX3D allows rendering raw simulation data directly in VRAM, so no large volumetric files have to be exported to the hard disk (see my technical talk)
- the rendering is so fast that it works interactively in real time for both rasterization and raytracing
- rasterization and raytracing are done in OpenCL and work on all GPUs, even the ones without RTX/DXR raytracing cores or without any rendering hardware at all (like A100, MI200, ...)
- if no monitor is available (like on a remote Linux server), there is an ASCII rendering mode to interactively visualize the simulation in the terminal (even in WSL and/or through SSH)
- rendering is fully multi-GPU-parallelized via seamless domain decomposition rasterization
- with interactive graphics mode disabled, image resolution can be as large as VRAM allows for (4K/8K/16K and above)
- (interacitive) visualization modes:
- flag wireframe / solid surface (and force vectors on solid cells or surface pressure if the extension is used)
- velocity field (with slice mode)
- streamlines (with slice mode)
- velocity-colored Q-criterion isosurface
- rasterized free surface with marching-cubes
- raytraced free surface with fast ray-grid traversal and marching-cubes, either 1-4 rays/pixel or 1-10 rays/pixel
Solving the Compatibility Problem
- FluidX3D is written in OpenCL 1.2, so it runs on all hardware from all vendors (Nvidia, AMD, Intel, ...):
- world's fastest datacenter GPUs: MI300X, H100 (NVL), A100, MI200, MI100, V100(S), GPU Max 1100, ...
- gaming GPUs (desktop/laptop): Nvidia GeForce, AMD Radeon, Intel Arc
- professional/workstation GPUs: Nvidia Quadro, AMD Radeon Pro / FirePro, Intel Arc Pro
- integrated GPUs
- CPUs (requires installation of Intel CPU Runtime for OpenCL)
- Intel Xeon Phi (requires installation of Intel CPU Runtime for OpenCL)
- smartphone ARM GPUs
- native cross-vendor multi-GPU implementation
- uses PCIe communication, so no SLI/Crossfire/NVLink/InfinityFabric required
- single-node parallelization, so no MPI installation required
- GPUs don't even have to be from the same vendor, but similar memory capacity and bandwidth are recommended
- works on Windows and Linux with C++17, with limited support also for macOS and Android
- supports importing and voxelizing triangle meshes from binary
.stl
files, with fast GPU voxelization - supports exporting volumetric data as binary
.vtk
files - supports exporting triangle meshes as binary
.vtk
files - supports exporting rendered images as
.png
/.qoi
/.bmp
files; encoding runs in parallel on the CPU while the simulation on GPU can continue without delay
Single-GPU/CPU Benchmarks
Here are performance benchmarks on various hardware in MLUPs/s, or how many million lattice cells are updated per second. The settings used for the benchmark are D3Q19 SRT with no extensions enabled (only LBM with implicit mid-grid bounce-back boundaries) and the setup consists of an empty cubic box with sufficient size (typically 256³). Without extensions, a single lattice cell requires:
- a memory capacity of 93 (FP32/FP32) or 55 (FP32/FP16) Bytes
- a memory bandwidth of 153 (FP32/FP32) or 77 (FP32/FP16) Bytes per time step
- 363 (FP32/FP32) or 406 (FP32/FP16S) or 1275 (FP32/FP16C) FLOPs per time step (FP32+INT32 operations counted combined)
In consequence, the arithmetic intensity of this implementation is 2.37 (FP32/FP32) or 5.27 (FP32/FP16S) or 16.56 (FP32/FP16C) FLOPs/Byte. So performance is only limited by memory bandwidth. The table in the left 3 columns shows the hardware specs as found in the data sheets (theoretical peak FP32 compute performance, memory capacity, theoretical peak memory bandwidth). The right 3 columns show the measured FluidX3D performance for FP32/FP32, FP32/FP16S, FP32/FP16C floating-point precision settings, with the (roofline model efficiency) in round brackets, indicating how much % of theoretical peak memory bandwidth are being used.
If your GPU/CPU is not on the list yet, you can report your benchmarks here.
gantt
title FluidX3D Performance [MLUPs/s] - FP32 arithmetic, (fastest of FP32/FP16S/FP16C) memory storage
dateFormat X
axisFormat %s
%%{
init: {
'theme': 'forest',
'themeVariables': {
'sectionBkgColor': '#99999999',
'sectionBkgColor2': '#99999999',
'altSectionBkgColor': '#00000000',
'titleColor': '#7F7F7F',
'textColor': '#7F7F7F',
'taskTextColor': 'lightgray',
'taskBorderColor': '#487E3A'
}
}
}%%
section MI300X
38207 :crit, 0, 38207
section MI250 (1 GCD)
9030 :crit, 0, 9030
section MI210
9547 :crit, 0, 9547
section MI100
8542 :crit, 0, 8542
section MI60
5111 :crit, 0, 5111
section Radeon VII
7778 :crit, 0, 7778
section GPU Max 1100
6209 :done, 0, 6209
section GH200 94GB GPU
34689 : 0, 34689
section H100 NVL
32613 : 0, 32613
section H100 PCIe
20624 : 0, 20624
section A100 SXM4 80GB
18448 : 0, 18448
section PG506-242/243
15654 : 0, 15654
section A100 PCIe 80GB
17896 : 0, 17896
section A100 SXM4 40GB
16013 : 0, 16013
section A100 PCIe 40GB
16035 : 0, 16035
section CMP 170HX
12392 : 0, 12392
section A30
9721 : 0, 9721
section V100 SXM2 32GB
8947 : 0, 8947
section V100 PCIe 16GB
10325 : 0, 10325
section GV100
6641 : 0, 6641
section Titan V
7253 : 0, 7253
section P100 PCIe 16GB
5950 : 0, 5950
section P100 PCIe 12GB
4141 : 0, 4141
section GTX TITAN
2500 : 0, 2500
section K40m
1868 : 0, 1868
section K80 (1 GPU)
1642 : 0, 1642
section K20c
1507 : 0, 1507
section RX 7900 XTX
7716 :crit, 0, 7716
section PRO W7900
5939 :crit, 0, 5939
section RX 7900 XT
5986 :crit, 0, 5986
section PRO W7800
4426 :crit, 0, 4426
section PRO W7700
2943 :crit, 0, 2943
section RX 7600
2561 :crit, 0, 2561
section PRO W7600
2287 :crit, 0, 2287
section PRO W7500
1682 :crit, 0, 1682
section RX 6900 XT
4227 :crit, 0, 4227
section RX 6800 XT
4241 :crit, 0, 4241
section PRO W6800
3361 :crit, 0, 3361
section RX 6700 XT
2908 :crit, 0, 2908
section RX 6800M
3213 :crit, 0, 3213
section RX 6700M
2429 :crit, 0, 2429
section RX 6600
1839 :crit, 0, 1839
section RX 6500 XT
1030 :crit, 0, 1030
section RX 5700 XT
3253 :crit, 0, 3253
section RX 5700
3167 :crit, 0, 3167
section RX 5600 XT
2214 :crit, 0, 2214
section RX Vega 64
3227 :crit, 0, 3227
section RX 590
1688 :crit, 0, 1688
section RX 580 4GB
1848 :crit, 0, 1848
section RX 580 2048SP 8GB
1622 :crit, 0, 1622
section R9 390X
2217 :crit, 0, 2217
section HD 7850
635 :crit, 0, 635
section Arc B580 LE
5370 :done, 0, 5370
section Arc A770 LE
4568 :done, 0, 4568
section Arc A750 LE
4314 :done, 0, 4314
section Arc A580
3889 :done, 0, 3889
section Arc A380
1115 :done, 0, 1115
section RTX 4090
11496 : 0, 11496
section RTX 6000 Ada
10293 : 0, 10293
section L40S
7637 : 0, 7637
section RTX 4080 Super
8218 : 0, 8218
section RTX 4080
7933 : 0, 7933
section RTX 4070 Ti Super
7295 : 0, 7295
section RTX 4070
5016 : 0, 5016
section RTX 4080M
5114 : 0, 5114
section RTX 4000 Ada
4221 : 0, 4221
section RTX 4060
3124 : 0, 3124
section RTX 4070M
3092 : 0, 3092
section RTX 2000 Ada
2526 : 0, 2526
section RTX 3090 Ti
10956 : 0, 10956
section RTX 3090
10732 : 0, 10732
section RTX 3080 Ti
9832 : 0, 9832
section RTX 3080 12GB
9657 : 0, 9657
section RTX A6000
8814 : 0, 8814
section RTX 3080 10GB
8118 : 0, 8118
section RTX 3080M Ti
5908 : 0, 5908
section RTX 3070
5096 : 0, 5096
section RTX 3060 Ti
5129 : 0, 5129
section RTX A4000
4945 : 0, 4945
section RTX A5000M
4461 : 0, 4461
section RTX 3060
4070 : 0, 4070
section RTX 3060M
4012 : 0, 4012
section RTX 3050M Ti
2341 : 0, 2341
section RTX 3050M
2339 : 0, 2339
section Titan RTX
7554 : 0, 7554
section RTX 6000
6879 : 0, 6879
section RTX 8000 Passive
5607 : 0, 5607
section RTX 2080 Ti
6853 : 0, 6853
section RTX 2080 Super
5284 : 0, 5284
section RTX 5000
4773 : 0, 4773
section RTX 2070 Super
4893 : 0, 4893
section RTX 2060 Super
5035 : 0, 5035
section RTX 4000
4584 : 0, 4584
section RTX 2060 KO
3376 : 0, 3376
section RTX 2060
3604 : 0, 3604
section GTX 1660 Super
3551 : 0, 3551
section T4
2887 : 0, 2887
section GTX 1660 Ti
3041 : 0, 3041
section GTX 1660
1992 : 0, 1992
section GTX 1650M 896C
1858 : 0, 1858
section GTX 1650M 1024C
1400 : 0, 1400
section T500
665 : 0, 665
section Titan Xp
5495 : 0, 5495
section GTX 1080 Ti
4877 : 0, 4877
section GTX 1080
3182 : 0, 3182
section GTX 1060 6GB
1925 : 0, 1925
section GTX 1060M
1882 : 0, 1882
section GTX 1050M Ti
1224 : 0, 1224
section P1000
839 : 0, 839
section GTX 970
1721 : 0, 1721
section M4000
1519 : 0, 1519
section M60 (1 GPU)
1571 : 0, 1571
section GTX 960M
872 : 0, 872
section GTX 770
1215 : 0, 1215
section GTX 680 4GB
1274 : 0, 1274
section K2000
444 : 0, 444
section GT 630 (OEM)
185 : 0, 185
section NVS 290
9 : 0, 9
section Arise 1020
6 :active, 0, 6
section M2 Max (38-CU, 32GB)
4641 :done, 0, 4641
section M1 Ultra (64-CU, 128GB)
8418 :done, 0, 8418
section M1 Max (24-CU, 32GB)
4496 :done, 0, 4496
section M1 Pro (16-CU, 16GB)
2329 :done, 0, 2329
section M1 (8-CU, 16GB)
759 :done, 0, 759
section Radeon Graphics (7800X3D)
498 :crit, 0, 498
section 780M (Z1 Extreme)
860 :crit, 0, 860
section Vega 8 (4750G)
511 :crit, 0, 511
section Vega 8 (3500U)
288 :crit, 0, 288
section Arc 140V GPU (16GB)
1282 :done, 0, 1282
section Arc Graphics (Ultra 9 185H)
724 :done, 0, 724
section Iris Xe Graphics (i7-1265U)
621 :done, 0, 621
section UHD Xe 32EUs
245 :done, 0, 245
section UHD 770
475 :done, 0, 475
section UHD 630
301 :done, 0, 301
section UHD P630
288 :done, 0, 288
section HD 5500
192 :done, 0, 192
section HD 4600
115 :done, 0, 115
section Orange Pi 5 Mali-G610 MP4
232 :active, 0, 232
section Samsung Mali-G72 MP18 (S9+)
230 :active, 0, 230
section 2x EPYC 9754
5179 :crit, 0, 5179
section 2x EPYC 9654
1814 :crit, 0, 1814
section 2x EPYC 7352
739 :crit, 0, 739
section 2x EPYC 7313
498 :crit, 0, 498
section 2x EPYC 7302
784 :crit, 0, 784
section 2x 6980P
7875 :done, 0, 7875
section 2x 6979P
8135 :done, 0, 8135
section 2x Platinum 8592+
3135 :done, 0, 3135
section 2x CPU Max 9480
2037 :done, 0, 2037
section 2x Platinum 8480+
2162 :done, 0, 2162
section 2x Platinum 8380
1410 :done, 0, 1410
section 2x Platinum 8358
1285 :done, 0, 1285
section 2x Platinum 8256
396 :done, 0, 396
section 2x Platinum 8153
691 :done, 0, 691
section 2x Gold 6248R
755 :done, 0, 755
section 2x Gold 6128
254 :done, 0, 254
section Phi 7210
415 :done, 0, 415
section 4x E5-4620 v4
460 :done, 0, 460
section 2x E5-2630 v4
264 :done, 0, 264
section 2x E5-2623 v4
125 :done, 0, 125
section 2x E5-2680 v3
304 :done, 0, 304
section GH200 Neoverse-V2
1323 : 0, 1323
section TR PRO 7995WX
1715 :crit, 0, 1715
section TR 3970X
463 :crit, 0, 463
section TR 1950X
273 :crit, 0, 273
section Ryzen 7800X3D
363 :crit, 0, 363
section Ryzen 5700X3D
229 :crit, 0, 229
section FX-6100
22 :crit, 0, 22
section Athlon X2 QL-65
3 :crit, 0, 3
section Ultra 7 258V
287 :done, 0, 287
section Ultra 9 185H
317 :done, 0, 317
section i9-14900K
490 :done, 0, 490
section i7-13700K
504 :done, 0, 504
section i7-1265U
128 :done, 0, 128
section i9-11900KB
208 :done, 0, 208
section i9-10980XE
286 :done, 0, 286
section E-2288G
198 :done, 0, 198
section i7-9700
103 :done, 0, 103
section i5-9600
147 :done, 0, 147
section i7-8700K
152 :done, 0, 152
section E-2176G
201 :done, 0, 201
section i7-7700HQ
108 :done, 0, 108
section E3-1240 v5
141 :done, 0, 141
section i5-5300U
37 :done, 0, 37
section i7-4770
104 :done, 0, 104
section i7-4720HQ
80 :done, 0, 80
section N2807
7 :done, 0, 7
<details><summary>Single-GPU/CPU Benchmark Table</summary>
Colors: 🔴 AMD, 🔵 Intel, 🟢 Nvidia, ⚪ Apple, 🟡 ARM, 🟤 Glenfly
Device | FP32<br>[TFlops/s] | Mem<br>[GB] | BW<br>[GB/s] | FP32/FP32<br>[MLUPs/s] | FP32/FP16S<br>[MLUPs/s] | FP32/FP16C<br>[MLUPs/s] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
🔴 Instinct MI300X | 163.40 | 192 | 5300 | 20711 (60%) | 38207 (56%) | 31169 (45%) |
🔴 Instinct MI250 (1 GCD) | 45.26 | 64 | 1638 | 5638 (53%) | 9030 (42%) | 8506 (40%) |
🔴 Instinct MI210 | 45.26 | 64 | 1638 | 6517 (61%) | 9547 (45%) | 8829 (41%) |
🔴 Instinct MI100 | 46.14 | 32 | 1228 | 5093 (63%) | 8133 (51%) | 8542 (54%) |
🔴 Instinct MI60 | 14.75 | 32 | 1024 | 3570 (53%) | 5047 (38%) | 5111 (38%) |
🔴 Radeon VII | 13.83 | 16 | 1024 | 4898 (73%) | 7778 (58%) | 5256 (40%) |
🔵 Data Center GPU Max 1100 | 22.22 | 48 | 1229 | 3487 (43%) | 6209 (39%) | 3252 (20%) |
🟢 GH200 94GB GPU | 66.91 | 94 | 4000 | 20595 (79%) | 34689 (67%) | 19407 (37%) |
🟢 H100 NVL | 60.32 | 94 | 3938 | 20018 (78%) | 32613 (64%) | 17605 (34%) |
🟢 H100 PCIe | 51.01 | 80 | 2000 | 11128 (85%) | 20624 (79%) | 13862 (53%) |
🟢 A100 SXM4 80GB | 19.49 | 80 | 2039 | 10228 (77%) | 18448 (70%) | 11197 (42%) |
🟢 A100 PCIe 80GB | 19.49 | 80 | 1935 | 9657 (76%) | 17896 (71%) | 10817 (43%) |
🟢 PG506-243 / PG506-242 | 22.14 | 64 | 1638 | 8195 (77%) | 15654 (74%) | 12271 (58%) |
🟢 A100 SXM4 40GB | 19.49 | 40 | 1555 | 8522 (84%) | 16013 (79%) | 11251 (56%) |
🟢 A100 PCIe 40GB | 19.49 | 40 | 1555 | 8526 (84%) | 16035 (79%) | 11088 (55%) |
🟢 CMP 170HX | 6.32 | 8 | 1493 | 7684 (79%) | 12392 (64%) | 6859 (35%) |
🟢 A30 | 10.32 | 24 | 933 | 5004 (82%) | 9721 (80%) | 5726 (47%) |
🟢 Tesla V100 SXM2 32GB | 15.67 | 32 | 900 | 4471 (76%) | 8947 (77%) | 7217 (62%) |
🟢 Tesla V100 PCIe 16GB | 14.13 | 16 | 900 | 5128 (87%) | 10325 (88%) | 7683 (66%) |
🟢 Quadro GV100 | 16.66 | 32 | 870 | 3442 (61%) | 6641 (59%) | 5863 (52%) |
🟢 Titan V | 14.90 | 12 | 653 | 3601 (84%) | 7253 (86%) | 6957 (82%) |
🟢 Tesla P100 16GB | 9.52 | 16 | 732 | 3295 (69%) | 5950 (63%) | 4176 (44%) |
🟢 Tesla P100 12GB | 9.52 | 12 | 549 | 2427 (68%) | 4141 (58%) | 3999 (56%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX TITAN | 4.71 | 6 | 288 | 1460 (77%) | 2500 (67%) | 1113 (30%) |
🟢 Tesla K40m | 4.29 | 12 | 288 | 1131 (60%) | 1868 (50%) | 912 (24%) |
🟢 Tesla K80 (1 GPU) | 4.11 | 12 | 240 | 916 (58%) | 1642 (53%) | 943 (30%) |
🟢 Tesla K20c | 3.52 | 5 | 208 | 861 (63%) | 1507 (56%) | 720 (27%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 7900 XTX | 61.44 | 24 | 960 | 3665 (58%) | 7644 (61%) | 7716 (62%) |
🔴 Radeon PRO W7900 | 61.30 | 48 | 864 | 3107 (55%) | 5939 (53%) | 5780 (52%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 7900 XT | 51.61 | 20 | 800 | 3013 (58%) | 5856 (56%) | 5986 (58%) |
🔴 Radeon PRO W7800 | 45.20 | 32 | 576 | 1872 (50%) | 4426 (59%) | 4145 (55%) |
🔴 Radeon PRO W7700 | 28.30 | 16 | 576 | 1547 (41%) | 2943 (39%) | 2899 (39%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 7600 | 21.75 | 8 | 288 | 1250 (66%) | 2561 (68%) | 2512 (67%) |
🔴 Radeon PRO W7600 | 20.00 | 8 | 288 | 1179 (63%) | 2263 (61%) | 2287 (61%) |
🔴 Radeon PRO W7500 | 12.20 | 8 | 172 | 856 (76%) | 1630 (73%) | 1682 (75%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 6900 XT | 23.04 | 16 | 512 | 1968 (59%) | 4227 (64%) | 4207 (63%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 6800 XT | 20.74 | 16 | 512 | 2008 (60%) | 4241 (64%) | 4224 (64%) |
🔴 Radeon PRO W6800 | 17.83 | 32 | 512 | 1620 (48%) | 3361 (51%) | 3180 (48%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 6700 XT | 13.21 | 12 | 384 | 1408 (56%) | 2883 (58%) | 2908 (58%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 6800M | 11.78 | 12 | 384 | 1439 (57%) | 3190 (64%) | 3213 (64%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 6700M | 10.60 | 10 | 320 | 1194 (57%) | 2388 (57%) | 2429 (58%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 6600 | 8.93 | 8 | 224 | 963 (66%) | 1817 (62%) | 1839 (63%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 6500 XT | 5.77 | 4 | 144 | 459 (49%) | 1011 (54%) | 1030 (55%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 5700 XT | 9.75 | 8 | 448 | 1368 (47%) | 3253 (56%) | 3049 (52%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 5700 | 7.72 | 8 | 448 | 1521 (52%) | 3167 (54%) | 2758 (47%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 5600 XT | 6.73 | 6 | 288 | 1136 (60%) | 2214 (59%) | 2148 (57%) |
🔴 Radeon RX Vega 64 | 13.35 | 8 | 484 | 1875 (59%) | 2878 (46%) | 3227 (51%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 590 | 5.53 | 8 | 256 | 1257 (75%) | 1573 (47%) | 1688 (51%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 580 4GB | 6.50 | 4 | 256 | 946 (57%) | 1848 (56%) | 1577 (47%) |
🔴 Radeon RX 580 2048SP 8GB | 4.94 | 8 | 224 | 868 (59%) | 1622 (56%) | 1240 (43%) |
🔴 Radeon R9 390X | 5.91 | 8 | 384 | 1733 (69%) | 2217 (44%) | 1722 (35%) |
🔴 Radeon HD 7850 | 1.84 | 2 | 154 | 112 (11%) | 120 ( 6%) | 635 (32%) |
🔵 Arc B580 LE | 14.59 | 12 | 456 | 1573 (53%) | 5370 (91%) | 2511 (42%) |
🔵 Arc A770 LE | 19.66 | 16 | 560 | 2663 (73%) | 4568 (63%) | 4519 (62%) |
🔵 Arc A750 LE | 17.20 | 8 | 512 | 2555 (76%) | 4314 (65%) | 4047 (61%) |
🔵 Arc A580 | 12.29 | 8 | 512 | 2534 (76%) | 3889 (58%) | 3488 (52%) |
🔵 Arc A380 | 4.20 | 6 | 186 | 622 (51%) | 1097 (45%) | 1115 (46%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4090 | 82.58 | 24 | 1008 | 5624 (85%) | 11091 (85%) | 11496 (88%) |
🟢 RTX 6000 Ada | 91.10 | 48 | 960 | 4997 (80%) | 10249 (82%) | 10293 (83%) |
🟢 L40S | 91.61 | 48 | 864 | 3788 (67%) | 7637 (68%) | 7617 (68%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4080 Super | 52.22 | 16 | 736 | 4089 (85%) | 7660 (80%) | 8218 (86%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4080 | 55.45 | 16 | 717 | 3914 (84%) | 7626 (82%) | 7933 (85%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Super | 44.10 | 16 | 672 | 3694 (84%) | 6435 (74%) | 7295 (84%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4070 | 29.15 | 12 | 504 | 2646 (80%) | 4548 (69%) | 5016 (77%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4080M | 33.85 | 12 | 432 | 2577 (91%) | 5086 (91%) | 5114 (91%) |
🟢 RTX 4000 Ada | 26.73 | 20 | 360 | 2130 (91%) | 3964 (85%) | 4221 (90%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4060 | 15.11 | 8 | 272 | 1614 (91%) | 3052 (86%) | 3124 (88%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 4070M | 18.25 | 8 | 256 | 1553 (93%) | 2945 (89%) | 3092 (93%) |
🟢 RTX 2000 Ada | 12.00 | 16 | 224 | 1351 (92%) | 2452 (84%) | 2526 (87%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3090 Ti | 40.00 | 24 | 1008 | 5717 (87%) | 10956 (84%) | 10400 (79%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3090 | 39.05 | 24 | 936 | 5418 (89%) | 10732 (88%) | 10215 (84%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | 37.17 | 12 | 912 | 5202 (87%) | 9832 (87%) | 9347 (79%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3080 12GB | 32.26 | 12 | 912 | 5071 (85%) | 9657 (81%) | 8615 (73%) |
🟢 RTX A6000 | 40.00 | 48 | 768 | 4421 (88%) | 8814 (88%) | 8533 (86%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3080 10GB | 29.77 | 10 | 760 | 4230 (85%) | 8118 (82%) | 7714 (78%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3080M Ti | 23.61 | 16 | 512 | 2985 (89%) | 5908 (89%) | 5780 (87%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3070 | 20.31 | 8 | 448 | 2578 (88%) | 5096 (88%) | 5060 (87%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3060 Ti | 16.49 | 8 | 448 | 2644 (90%) | 5129 (88%) | 4718 (81%) |
🟢 RTX A4000 | 19.17 | 16 | 448 | 2500 (85%) | 4945 (85%) | 4664 (80%) |
🟢 RTX A5000M | 16.59 | 16 | 448 | 2228 (76%) | 4461 (77%) | 3662 (63%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3060 | 13.17 | 12 | 360 | 2108 (90%) | 4070 (87%) | 3566 (76%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3060M | 10.94 | 6 | 336 | 2019 (92%) | 4012 (92%) | 3572 (82%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3050M Ti | 7.60 | 4 | 192 | 1181 (94%) | 2341 (94%) | 2253 (90%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 3050M | 7.13 | 4 | 192 | 1180 (94%) | 2339 (94%) | 2016 (81%) |
🟢 Titan RTX | 16.31 | 24 | 672 | 3471 (79%) | 7456 (85%) | 7554 (87%) |
🟢 Quadro RTX 6000 | 16.31 | 24 | 672 | 3307 (75%) | 6836 (78%) | 6879 (79%) |
🟢 Quadro RTX 8000 Passive | 14.93 | 48 | 624 | 2591 (64%) | 5408 (67%) | 5607 (69%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 13.45 | 11 | 616 | 3194 (79%) | 6700 (84%) | 6853 (86%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 2080 Super | 11.34 | 8 | 496 | 2434 (75%) | 5284 (82%) | 5087 (79%) |
🟢 Quadro RTX 5000 | 11.15 | 16 | 448 | 2341 (80%) | 4766 (82%) | 4773 (82%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 2070 Super | 9.22 | 8 | 448 | 2255 (77%) | 4866 (84%) | 4893 (84%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 2060 Super | 7.18 | 8 | 448 | 2503 (85%) | 5035 (87%) | 4463 (77%) |
🟢 Quadro RTX 4000 | 7.12 | 8 | 416 | 2284 (84%) | 4584 (85%) | 4062 (75%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 2060 KO | 6.74 | 6 | 336 | 1643 (75%) | 3376 (77%) | 3266 (75%) |
🟢 GeForce RTX 2060 | 6.74 | 6 | 336 | 1681 (77%) | 3604 (83%) | 3571 (82%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1660 Super | 5.03 | 6 | 336 | 1696 (77%) | 3551 (81%) | 3040 (70%) |
🟢 Tesla T4 | 8.14 | 15 | 300 | 1356 (69%) | 2869 (74%) | 2887 (74%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | 5.48 | 6 | 288 | 1467 (78%) | 3041 (81%) | 3019 (81%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1660 | 5.07 | 6 | 192 | 1016 (81%) | 1924 (77%) | 1992 (80%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1650M 896C | 2.72 | 4 | 192 | 963 (77%) | 1836 (74%) | 1858 (75%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1650M 1024C | 3.20 | 4 | 128 | 706 (84%) | 1214 (73%) | 1400 (84%) |
🟢 T500 | 3.04 | 4 | 80 | 339 (65%) | 578 (56%) | 665 (64%) |
🟢 Titan Xp | 12.15 | 12 | 548 | 2919 (82%) | 5495 (77%) | 5375 (76%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1080 Ti | 12.06 | 11 | 484 | 2631 (83%) | 4837 (77%) | 4877 (78%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1080 | 9.78 | 8 | 320 | 1623 (78%) | 3100 (75%) | 3182 (77%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1060 6GB | 4.57 | 6 | 192 | 997 (79%) | 1925 (77%) | 1785 (72%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1060M | 4.44 | 6 | 192 | 983 (78%) | 1882 (75%) | 1803 (72%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 1050M Ti | 2.49 | 4 | 112 | 631 (86%) | 1224 (84%) | 1115 (77%) |
🟢 Quadro P1000 | 1.89 | 4 | 82 | 426 (79%) | 839 (79%) | 778 (73%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 970 | 4.17 | 4 | 224 | 980 (67%) | 1721 (59%) | 1623 (56%) |
🟢 Quadro M4000 | 2.57 | 8 | 192 | 899 (72%) | 1519 (61%) | 1050 (42%) |
🟢 Tesla M60 (1 GPU) | 4.82 | 8 | 160 | 853 (82%) | 1571 (76%) | 1557 (75%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 960M | 1.51 | 4 | 80 | 442 (84%) | 872 (84%) | 627 (60%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 770 | 3.33 | 2 | 224 | 800 (55%) | 1215 (42%) | 876 (30%) |
🟢 GeForce GTX 680 4GB | 3.33 | 4 | 192 | 783 (62%) | 1274 (51%) | 814 (33%) |
🟢 Quadro K2000 | 0.73 | 2 | 64 | 312 (75%) | 444 (53%) | 171 (21%) |
🟢 GeForce GT 630 (OEM) | 0.46 | 2 | 29 | 151 (81%) | 185 (50%) | 78 (21%) |
🟢 Quadro NVS 290 | 0.03 | 1/4 | 6 | 9 (22%) | 4 ( 5%) | 4 ( 5%) |
🟤 Arise 1020 | 1.50 | 2 | 19 | 6 ( 5%) | 6 ( 2%) | 6 ( 2%) |
⚪ M2 Max GPU 38CU 32GB | 9.73 | 22 | 400 | 2405 (92%) | 4641 (89%) | 2444 (47%) |
⚪ M1 Ultra GPU 64CU 128GB | 16.38 | 98 | 800 | 4519 (86%) | 8418 (81%) | 6915 (67%) |
⚪ M1 Max GPU 24CU 32GB | 6.14 | 22 | 400 | 2369 (91%) | 4496 (87%) | 2777 (53%) |
⚪ M1 Pro GPU 16CU 16GB | 4.10 | 11 | 200 | 1204 (92%) | 2329 (90%) | 1855 (71%) |
⚪ M1 GPU 8CU 16GB | 2.05 | 11 | 68 | 384 (86%) | 758 (85%) | 759 (86%) |
🔴 Radeon 780M (Z1 Extreme) | 8.29 | 8 | 102 | 443 (66%) | 860 (65%) | 820 (62%) |
🔴 Radeon Graphics (7800X3D) | 0.56 | 12 | 102 | 338 (51%) | 498 (37%) | 283 (21%) |
🔴 Radeon Vega 8 (4750G) | 2.15 | 27 | 57 | 263 (71%) | 511 (70%) | 501 (68%) |
🔴 Radeon Vega 8 (3500U) | 1.23 | 7 | 38 | 157 (63%) | 282 (57%) | 288 (58%) |
🔵 Arc 140V GPU (16GB) | 3.99 | 16 | 137 | 636 (71%) | 1282 (72%) | 773 (44%) |
🔵 Arc Graphics (Ultra 9 185H) | 4.81 | 14 | 90 | 271 (46%) | 710 (61%) | 724 (62%) |
🔵 Iris Xe Graphics (i7-1265U) | 1.92 | 13 | 77 | 342 (68%) | 621 (62%) | 574 (58%) |
🔵 UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs | 0.74 | 25 | 51 | 128 (38%) | 245 (37%) | 216 (32%) |
🔵 UHD Graphics 770 | 0.82 | 30 | 90 | 342 (58%) | 475 (41%) | 278 (24%) |
🔵 UHD Graphics 630 | 0.46 | 7 | 51 | 151 (45%) | 301 (45%) | 187 (28%) |
🔵 UHD Graphics P630 | 0.46 | 51 | 42 | 177 (65%) | 288 (53%) | 137 (25%) |
🔵 HD Graphics 5500 | 0.35 | 3 | 26 | 75 (45%) | 192 (58%) | 108 (32%) |
🔵 HD Graphics 4600 | 0.38 | 2 | 26 | 105 (63%) | 115 (35%) | 34 (10%) |
🟡 Mali-G610 MP4 (Orange Pi 5) | 0.06 | 16 | 34 | 130 (58%) | 232 (52%) | 93 (21%) |
🟡 Mali-G72 MP18 (Samsung S9+) | 0.24 | 4 | 29 | 110 (59%) | 230 (62%) | 21 ( 6%) |
🔴 2x EPYC 9754 | 50.79 | 3072 | 922 | 3276 (54%) | 5077 (42%) | 5179 (43%) |
🔴 2x EPYC 9654 | 43.62 | 1536 | 922 | 1381 (23%) | 1814 (15%) | 1801 (15%) |
🔴 2x EPYC 7352 | 3.53 | 512 | 410 | 739 (28%) | 106 ( 2%) | 412 ( 8%) |
🔴 2x EPYC 7313 | 3.07 | 128 | 410 | 498 (19%) | 367 ( 7%) | 418 ( 8%) |
🔴 2x EPYC 7302 | 3.07 | 128 | 410 | 784 (29%) | 336 ( 6%) | 411 ( 8%) |
🔵 2x Xeon 6980P | 98.30 | 6144 | 1690 | 7875 (71%) | 5112 (23%) | 5610 (26%) |
🔵 2x Xeon 6979P | 92.16 | 3072 | 1690 | 8135 (74%) | 4175 (19%) | 4622 (21%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Platinum 8592+ | 31.13 | 1024 | 717 | 3135 (67%) | 2359 (25%) | 2466 (26%) |
🔵 2x Xeon CPU Max 9480 | 27.24 | 256 | 614 | 2037 (51%) | 1520 (19%) | 1464 (18%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Platinum 8480+ | 28.67 | 512 | 614 | 2162 (54%) | 1845 (23%) | 1884 (24%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Platinum 8380 | 23.55 | 2048 | 410 | 1410 (53%) | 1159 (22%) | 1298 (24%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Platinum 8358 | 21.30 | 256 | 410 | 1285 (48%) | 1007 (19%) | 1120 (21%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Platinum 8256 | 3.89 | 1536 | 282 | 396 (22%) | 158 ( 4%) | 175 ( 5%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Platinum 8153 | 8.19 | 384 | 256 | 691 (41%) | 290 ( 9%) | 328 (10%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Gold 6248R | 18.43 | 384 | 282 | 755 (41%) | 566 (15%) | 694 (19%) |
🔵 2x Xeon Gold 6128 | 5.22 | 192 | 256 | 254 (15%) | 185 ( 6%) | 193 ( 6%) |
🔵 Xeon Phi 7210 | 5.32 | 192 | 102 | 415 (62%) | 193 (15%) | 223 (17%) |
🔵 4x Xeon E5-4620 v4 | 2.69 | 512 | 273 | 460 (26%) | 275 ( 8%) | 239 ( 7%) |
🔵 2x Xeon E5-2630 v4 | 1.41 | 64 | 137 | 264 (30%) | 146 ( 8%) | 129 ( 7%) |
🔵 2x Xeon E5-2623 v4 | 0.67 | 64 | 137 | 125 (14%) | 66 ( 4%) | 59 ( 3%) |
🔵 2x Xeon E5-2680 v3 | 1.92 | 128 | 137 | 304 (34%) | 234 (13%) | 291 (16%) |
🟢 GH200 Neoverse-V2 CPU | 7.88 | 480 | 384 | 1323 (53%) | 853 (17%) | 683 (14%) |
🔴 Threadripper PRO 7995WX | 15.36 | 256 | 333 | 1134 (52%) | 1697 (39%) | 1715 (40%) |
🔴 Threadripper 3970X | 3.79 | 128 | 102 | 376 (56%) | 103 ( 8%) | 463 (35%) |
🔴 Threadripper 1950X | 0.87 | 128 | 85 | 273 (49%) | 43 ( 4%) | 151 (14%) |
🔴 Ryzen 7 7800X3D | 1.08 | 32 | 102 | 296 (44%) | 361 (27%) | 363 (27%) |
🔴 Ryzen 7 5700X3D | 0.87 | 32 | 51 | 229 (68%) | 135 (20%) | 173 (26%) |
🔴 FX-6100 | 0.16 | 16 | 26 | 11 ( 7%) | 11 ( 3%) | 22 ( 7%) |
🔴 Athlon X2 QL-65 | 0.03 | 4 | 11 | 3 ( 4%) | 2 ( 2%) | 3 ( 2%) |
🔵 Core Ultra 7 258V | 0.56 | 32 | 137 | 287 (32%) | 123 ( 7%) | 167 ( 9%) |
🔵 Core Ultra 9 185H | 1.79 | 16 | 90 | 317 (54%) | 267 (23%) | 288 (25%) |
🔵 Core i9-14900K | 3.74 | 32 | 96 | 443 (71%) | 453 (36%) | 490 (39%) |
🔵 Core i7-13700K | 2.51 | 64 | 90 | 504 (86%) | 398 (34%) | 424 (36%) |
🔵 Core i7-1265U | 1.23 | 32 | 77 | 128 (26%) | 62 ( 6%) | 58 ( 6%) |
🔵 Core i9-11900KB | 0.84 | 32 | 51 | 109 (33%) | 195 (29%) | 208 (31%) |
🔵 Core i9-10980XE | 3.23 | 128 | 94 | 286 (47%) | 251 (21%) | 223 (18%) |
🔵 Xeon E-2288G | 0.95 | 32 | 43 | 196 (70%) | 182 (33%) | 198 (36%) |
🔵 Core i7-9700 | 0.77 | 64 | 43 | 103 (37%) | 62 (11%) | 95 (17%) |
🔵 Core i5-9600 | 0.60 | 16 | 43 | 146 (52%) | 127 (23%) | 147 (27%) |
🔵 Core i7-8700K | 0.71 | 16 | 51 | 152 (45%) | 134 (20%) | 116 (17%) |
🔵 Xeon E-2176G | 0.71 | 64 | 42 | 201 (74%) | 136 (25%) | 148 (27%) |
🔵 Core i7-7700HQ | 0.36 | 12 | 38 | 81 (32%) | 82 (16%) | 108 (22%) |
🔵 Xeon E3-1240 v5 | 0.50 | 32 | 34 | 141 (63%) | 75 (17%) | 88 (20%) |
🔵 Core i7-4770 | 0.44 | 16 | 26 | 104 (62%) | 69 (21%) | 59 (18%) |
🔵 Core i7-4720HQ | 0.33 | 16 | 26 | 80 (48%) | 23 ( 7%) | 60 (18%) |
🔵 Celeron N2807 | 0.01 | 4 | 11 | 7 (10%) | 3 ( 2%) | 3 ( 2%) |
Multi-GPU Benchmarks
Multi-GPU benchmarks are done at the largest possible grid resolution with cubic domains, and either 2x1x1, 2x2x1 or 2x2x2 of these domains together. The (percentages in round brackets) are single-GPU roofline model efficiency, and the (multiplicators in round brackets) are scaling factors relative to benchmarked single-GPU performance.
<details><summary>Multi-GPU Benchmark Table</summary>Colors: 🔴 AMD, 🔵 Intel, 🟢 Nvidia, ⚪ Apple, 🟡 ARM, 🟤 Glenfly
Device | FP32<br>[TFlops/s] | Mem<br>[GB] | BW<br>[GB/s] | FP32/FP32<br>[MLUPs/s] | FP32/FP16S<br>[MLUPs/s] | FP32/FP16C<br>[MLUPs/s] |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
🔴 1x Instinct MI250 (1 GCD) | 45.26 | 64 | 1638 | 5638 (53%) | 9030 (42%) | 8506 (40%) |
🔴 1x Instinct MI250 (2 GCD) | 90.52 | 128 | 3277 | 9460 (1.7x) | 14313 (1.6x) | 17338 (2.0x) |
🔴 2x Instinct MI250 (4 GCD) | 181.04 | 256 | 6554 | 16925 (3.0x) | 29163 (3.2x) | 29627 (3.5x) |
🔴 4x Instinct MI250 (8 GCD) | 362.08 | 512 | 13107 | 27350 (4.9x) | 52258 (5.8x) | 53521 (6.3x) |
🔴 1x Instinct MI210 | 45.26 | 64 | 1638 | 6347 (59%) | 8486 (40%) | 9105 (43%) |
🔴 2x Instinct MI210 | 90.52 | 128 | 3277 | 7245 (1.1x) | 12050 (1.4x) | 13539 (1.5x) |
🔴 4x Instinct MI210 | 181.04 | 256 | 6554 | 8816 (1.4x) | 17232 (2.0x) | 16892 (1.9x) |
🔴 8x Instinct MI210 | 362.08 | 512 | 13107 | 13546 (2.1x) | 27996 (3.3x) | 27820 (3.1x) |
🔴 16x Instinct MI210 | 724.16 | 1024 | 26214 | 18094 (2.9x) | 37360 (4.4x) | 37922 (4.2x) |
🔴 24x Instinct MI210 | 1086.24 | 1536 | 39322 | 22056 (3.5x) | 45033 (5.3x) | 44631 (4.9x) |
🔴 32x Instinct MI210 | 1448.32 | 2048 | 52429 | 23881 (3.8x) | 50952 (6.0x) | 48848 (5.4x) |
🔴 1x Radeon VII | 13.83 | 16 | 1024 | 4898 (73%) | 7778 (58%) | 5256 (40%) |
🔴 2x Radeon VII | 27.66 | 32 | 2048 | 8113 (1.7x) | 15591 (2.0x) | 10352 (2.0x) |
🔴 4x Radeon VII | 55.32 | 64 | 4096 | 12911 (2.6x) | 24273 (3.1x) | 17080 (3.2x) |
🔴 8x Radeon VII | 110.64 | 128 | 8192 | 21946 (4.5x) | 30826 (4.0x) | 24572 (4.7x) |
🔵 1x DC GPU Max 1100 | 22.22 | 48 | 1229 | 3487 (43%) | 6209 (39%) | 3252 (20%) |
🔵 2x DC GPU Max 1100 | 44.44 | 96 | 2458 | 6301 (1.8x) | 11815 (1.9x) | 5970 (1.8x) |
🔵 4x DC GPU Max 1100 | 88.88 | 192 | 4915 | 12162 (3.5x) | 22777 (3.7x) | 11759 (3.6x) |
🟢 1x A100 PCIe 80GB | 19.49 | 80 | 1935 | 9657 (76%) | 17896 (71%) | 10817 (43%) |
🟢 2x A100 PCIe 80GB | 38.98 | 160 | 3870 | 15742 (1.6x) | 27165 (1.5x) | 17510 (1.6x) |
🟢 4x A100 PCIe 80GB | 77.96 | 320 | 7740 | 25957 (2.7x) | 52056 (2.9x) | 33283 (3.1x) |
🟢 1x PG506-243 / PG506-242 | 22.14 | 64 | 1638 | 8195 (77%) | 15654 (74%) | 12271 (58%) |
🟢 2x PG506-243 / PG506-242 | 44.28 | 128 | 3277 | 13885 (1.7x) | 24168 (1.5x) | 20906 (1.7x) |
🟢 4x PG506-243 / PG506-242 | 88.57 | 256 | 6554 | 23097 (2.8x) | 41088 (2.6x) | 36130 (2.9x) |
🟢 1x A100 SXM4 40GB | 19.49 | 40 | 1555 | 8543 (84%) | 15917 (79%) | 8748 (43%) |
🟢 2x A100 SXM4 40GB | 38.98 | 80 | 3110 | 14311 (1.7x) | 23707 (1.5x) | 15512 (1.8x) |
🟢 4x A100 SXM4 40GB | 77.96 | 160 | 6220 | 23411 (2.7x) | 42400 (2.7x) | 29017 (3.3x) |
🟢 8x A100 SXM4 40GB | 155.92 | 320 | 12440 | 37619 (4.4x) | 72965 (4.6x) | 63009 (7.2x) |
🟢 1x A100 SXM4 40GB | 19.49 | 40 | 1555 | 8522 (84%) | 16013 (79%) | 11251 (56%) |
🟢 2x A100 SXM4 40GB | 38.98 | 80 | 3110 | 13629 (1.6x) | 24620 (1.5x) | 18850 (1.7x) |
🟢 4x A100 SXM4 40GB | 77.96 | 160 | 6220 | 17978 (2.1x) | 30604 (1.9x) | 30627 (2.7x) |
🟢 1x Tesla V100 SXM2 32GB | 15.67 | 32 | 900 | 4471 (76%) | 8947 (77%) | 7217 (62%) |
🟢 2x Tesla V100 SXM2 32GB | 31.34 | 64 | 1800 | 7953 (1.8x) | 15469 (1.7x) | 12932 (1.8x) |
🟢 4x Tesla V100 SXM2 32GB | 62.68 | 128 | 3600 | 13135 (2.9x) | 26527 (3.0x) | 22686 (3.1x) |
🟢 1x Tesla K40m | 4.29 | 12 | 288 | 1131 (60%) | 1868 (50%) | 912 (24%) |
🟢 2x Tesla K40m | 8.58 | 24 | 577 | 1971 (1.7x) | 3300 (1.8x) | 1801 (2.0x) |
🟢 3x K40m + 1x Titan Xp | 17.16 | 48 | 1154 | 3117 (2.8x) | 5174 (2.8x) | 3127 (3.4x) |
🟢 1x Tesla K80 (1 GPU) | 4.11 | 12 | 240 | 916 (58%) | 1642 (53%) | 943 (30%) |
🟢 1x Tesla K80 (2 GPU) | 8.22 | 24 | 480 | 2086 (2.3x) | 3448 (2.1x) | 2174 (2.3x) |
🟢 1x RTX A6000 | 40.00 | 48 | 768 | 4421 (88%) | 8814 (88%) | 8533 (86%) |
🟢 2x RTX A6000 | 80.00 | 96 | 1536 | 8041 (1.8x) | 15026 (1.7x) | 14795 (1.7x) |
🟢 4x RTX A6000 | 160.00 | 192 | 3072 | 14314 (3.2x) | 27915 (3.2x) | 27227 (3.2x) |
🟢 8x RTX A6000 | 320.00 | 384 | 6144 | 19311 (4.4x) | 40063 (4.5x) | 39004 (4.6x) |
🟢 1x Quadro RTX 8000 Pa. | 14.93 | 48 | 624 | 2591 (64%) | 5408 (67%) | 5607 (69%) |
🟢 2x Quadro RTX 8000 Pa. | 29.86 | 96 | 1248 | 4767 (1.8x) | 9607 (1.8x) | 10214 (1.8x) |
🟢 1x GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 13.45 | 11 | 616 | 3194 (79%) | 6700 (84%) | 6853 (86%) |
🟢 2x GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 26.90 | 22 | 1232 | 5085 (1.6x) | 10770 (1.6x) | 10922 (1.6x) |
🟢 4x GeForce RTX 2080 Ti | 53.80 | 44 | 2464 | 9117 (2.9x) | 18415 (2.7x) | 18598 (2.7x) |
🟢 7x 2080 Ti + 1x A100 40GB | 107.60 | 88 | 4928 | 16146 (5.1x) | 33732 (5.0x) | 33857 (4.9x) |
🔵 1x A770 + 🟢 1x Titan Xp | 24.30 | 24 | 1095 | 4717 (1.7x) | 8380 (1.7x) | 8026 (1.6x) |
FAQs
General
- <details><summary>How to learn using FluidX3D?</summary><br>Follow the <a href="https://github.com/ProjectPhysX/FluidX3D/blob/master/DOCUMENTATION.md">FluidX3D Documentation</a>!<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>What physical model does FluidX3D use?</summary><br>FluidX3D implements the lattice Boltzmann method, a type of direct numerical simulation (DNS), the most accurate type of fluid simulation, but also the most computationally challenging. Optional extension models include volume force (Guo forcing), free surface (<a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10060092">volume-of-fluid</a> and <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10020021">PLIC</a>), a temperature model and Smagorinsky-Lilly subgrid turbulence model.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>FluidX3D only uses FP32 or even FP32/FP16, in contrast to FP64. Are simulation results physically accurate?</summary><br>Yes, in all but extreme edge cases. The code has been specially optimized to minimize arithmetic round-off errors and make the most out of lower precision. With these optimizations, accuracy in most cases is indistinguishable from FP64 double-precision, even with FP32/FP16 mixed-precision. Details can be found in <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362275548_Accuracy_and_performance_of_the_lattice_Boltzmann_method_with_64-bit_32-bit_and_customized_16-bit_number_formats">this paper</a>.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>Compared to the benchmark numbers stated <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362275548_Accuracy_and_performance_of_the_lattice_Boltzmann_method_with_64-bit_32-bit_and_customized_16-bit_number_formats">here</a>, efficiency seems much lower but performance is slightly better for most devices. How can this be?</summary><br>In that paper, the One-Step-Pull swap algorithm is implemented, using only misaligned reads and coalesced writes. On almost all GPUs, the performance penalty for misaligned writes is much larger than for misaligned reads, and sometimes there is almost no penalty for misaligned reads at all. Because of this, One-Step-Pull runs at peak bandwidth and thus peak efficiency.<br>Here, a different swap algorithm termed <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/computation10060092">Esoteric-Pull</a> is used, a type of in-place streaming. This makes the LBM require much less memory (93 vs. 169 (FP32/FP32) or 55 vs. 93 (FP32/FP16) Bytes/cell for D3Q19), and also less memory bandwidth (153 vs. 171 (FP32/FP32) or 77 vs. 95 (FP32/FP16) Bytes/cell per time step for D3Q19) due to so-called implicit bounce-back boundaries. However memory access now is half coalesced and half misaligned for both reads and writes, so memory access efficiency is lower. For overall performance, these two effects approximately cancel out. The benefit of Esoteric-Pull - being able to simulate domains twice as large with the same amount of memory - clearly outweights the cost of slightly lower memory access efficiency, especially since performance is not reduced overall.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>Why don't you use CUDA? Wouldn't that be more efficient?</summary><br>No, that is a wrong myth. OpenCL is exactly as efficient as CUDA on Nvidia GPUs if optimized properly. <a href="https://www.researchgate.net/publication/362275548_Accuracy_and_performance_of_the_lattice_Boltzmann_method_with_64-bit_32-bit_and_customized_16-bit_number_formats">Here</a> I did roofline model and analyzed OpenCL performance on various hardware. OpenCL efficiency on modern Nvidia GPUs can be 100% with the right memory access pattern, so CUDA can't possibly be any more efficient. Without any performance advantage, there is no reason to use proprietary CUDA over OpenCL, since OpenCL is compatible with a lot more hardware.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>Why no multi-relaxation-time (MRT) collision operator?</summary><br>The idea of MRT is to linearly transform the DDFs into "moment space" by matrix multiplication and relax these moments individually, promising better stability and accuracy. In practice, in the vast majority of cases, it has zero or even negative effects on stability and accuracy, and simple SRT is much superior. Apart from the kinematic shear viscosity and conserved terms, the remaining moments are non-physical quantities and their tuning is a blackbox. Although MRT can be implemented in an efficient manner with only a single matrix-vector multiplication in registers, leading to identical performance compared to SRT by remaining bandwidth-bound, storing the matrices vastly elongates and over-complicates the code for no real benefit.<br><br></details>
Hardware
- <details><summary>Can FluidX3D run on multiple GPUs at the same time?</summary><br>Yes. The simulation grid is then split in domains, one for each GPU (domain decomposition method). The GPUs essentially pool their memory, enabling much larger grid resolution and higher performance. Rendering is parallelized across multiple GPUs as well; each GPU renders its own domain with a 3D offset, then rendered frames from all GPUs are overlayed with their z-buffers. Communication between domains is done over PCIe, so no SLI/Crossfire/NVLink/InfinityFabric is required. All GPUs must however be installed in the same node (PC/laptop/server). Even unholy combinations of Nvidia/AMD/Intel GPUs will work, although it is recommended to only use GPUs with similar memory capacity and bandwidth together. Using a fast gaming GPU and slow integrated GPU together would only decrease performance due to communication overhead.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I'm on a budget and have only a cheap computer. Can I run FluidX3D on my toaster PC/laptop?</summary><br>Absolutely. Today even the most inexpensive hardware, like integrated GPUs or entry-level gaming GPUs, support OpenCL. You might be a bit more limited on memory capacity and grid resolution, but you should be good to go. I've tested FluidX3D on very old and inexpensive hardware and even on my Samsung S9+ smartphone, and it runs just fine, although admittedly a bit slower.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I don't have an expensive workstation GPU, but only a gaming GPU. Will performance suffer?</summary><br>No. Efficiency on gaming GPUs is exactly as good as on their "professional"/workstation counterparts. Performance often is even better as gaming GPUs have higher boost clocks.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>Do I need a GPU with ECC memory?</summary><br>No. Gaming GPUs work just fine. Some Nvidia GPUs automatically reduce memory clocks for compute applications to almost entirely eliminate memory errors.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>My GPU does not support CUDA. Can I still use FluidX3D?</summary><br>Yes. FluidX3D uses OpenCL 1.2 and not CUDA, so it runs on any GPU from any vendor since around 2012.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I don't have a dedicated graphics card at all. Can I still run FluidX3D on my PC/laptop?</summary><br>Yes. FluidX3D also runs on all integrated GPUs since around 2012, and also on CPUs.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I need more memory than my GPU can offer. Can I run FluidX3D on my CPU as well?</summary><br>Yes. You only need to install the <a href="https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/intel-cpu-runtime-for-opencl-applications-with-sycl-support.html">Intel OpenCL CPU Runtime</a>.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>In the benchmarks you list some very expensive hardware. How do you get access to that?</summary><br>As a PhD candidate in computational physics, I used FluidX3D for my research, so I had access to BZHPC, SuperMUC-NG and JSC JURECA-DC supercomputers.<br><br></details>
Graphics
- <details><summary>I don't have an RTX/DXR GPU that supports raytracing. Can I still use raytracing graphics in FluidX3D?</summary><br>Yes, and at full performance. FluidX3D does not use a bounding volume hierarchy (BVH) to accelerate raytracing, but fast ray-grid traversal instead, implemented directly in OpenCL C. This is much faster than BVH for moving isosurfaces in the LBM grid (~N vs. ~N²+log(N) runtime; LBM itself is ~N³), and it does not require any dedicated raytracing hardware. Raytracing in FluidX3D runs on any GPU that supports OpenCL 1.2.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I have a datacenter/mining GPU without any video output or graphics hardware. Can FluidX3D still render simulation results?</summary><br>Yes. FluidX3D does all rendering (rasterization and raytracing) in OpenCL C, so no display output and no graphics features like OpenGL/Vulkan/DirectX are required. Rendering is just another form of compute after all. Rendered frames are passed to the CPU over PCIe and then the CPU can either draw them on screen through dedicated/integrated graphics or write them to the hard drive.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I'm running FluidX3D on a remote (super-)computer and only have an SSH terminal. Can I still use graphics somehow?</summary><br>Yes, either directly as interactive ASCII graphics in the terminal or by storing rendered frames on the hard drive and then copying them over via `scp -r user@server.url:"~/path/to/images/folder" .`.<br><br></details>
Licensing
- <details><summary>I want to learn about programming/software/physics/engineering. Can I use FluidX3D for free?</summary><br>Yes. Anyone can use FluidX3D for free for public research, education or personal use. Use by scientists, students and hobbyists is free of charge and well encouraged.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I am a scientist/teacher with a paid position at a public institution. Can I use FluidX3D for my research/teaching?</summary><br>Yes, you can use FluidX3D free of charge. This is considered research/education, not commercial use. To give credit, the <a href="https://github.com/ProjectPhysX/FluidX3D#references">references</a> listed below should be cited. If you publish data/results generated by altered source versions, the altered source code must be published as well.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>I work at a company in CFD/consulting/R&D or related fields. Can I use FluidX3D commercially?</summary><br>No. Commercial use is not allowed with the current license.<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>Is FluidX3D open-source?</summary><br>No. "Open-source" as a technical term is defined as freely available without any restriction on use, but I am not comfortable with that. I have written FluidX3D in my spare time and no one should milk it for profits while I remain uncompensated, especially considering what other CFD software sells for. The technical term for the type of license I choose is "source-available no-cost non-commercial". The source code is freely available, and you are free to use, to alter and to redistribute it, as long as you do not sell it or make a profit from derived products/services, and as long as you do not use it for any military purposes (see the <a href="https://github.com/ProjectPhysX/FluidX3D/blob/master/LICENSE.md">license</a> for details).<br><br></details>
- <details><summary>Will FluidX3D at some point be available with a commercial license?</summary><br>Maybe I will add the option for a second, commercial license later on. If you are interested in commercial use, let me know. For non-commercial use in science and education, FluidX3D is and will always be free.<br><br></details>
External Code/Libraries/Images used in FluidX3D
- OpenCL-Headers for GPU parallelization (Khronos Group)
- Win32 API for interactive graphics in Windows (Microsoft)
- X11/Xlib for interactive graphics in Linux (The Open Group)
- marching-cubes tables for isosurface generation on GPU (Paul Bourke)
src/lodepng.cpp
andsrc/lodepng.hpp
for.png
encoding and decoding (Lode Vandevenne)- SimplexNoise class in
src/utilities.hpp
for generating continuous noise in 2D/3D/4D space (Stefan Gustavson) skybox/skybox8k.png
for free surface raytracing (HDRI Hub)
References
- Lehmann, M.: Computational study of microplastic transport at the water-air interface with a memory-optimized lattice Boltzmann method. PhD thesis, (2023)
- Lehmann, M.: Esoteric Pull and Esoteric Push: Two Simple In-Place Streaming Schemes for the Lattice Boltzmann Method on GPUs. Computation, 10, 92, (2022)
- Lehmann, M., Krause, M., Amati, G., Sega, M., Harting, J. and Gekle, S.: Accuracy and performance of the lattice Boltzmann method with 64-bit, 32-bit, and customized 16-bit number formats. Phys. Rev. E 106, 015308, (2022)
- Lehmann, M.: Combined scientific CFD simulation and interactive raytracing with OpenCL. IWOCL'22: International Workshop on OpenCL, 3, 1-2, (2022)
- Lehmann, M., Oehlschlägel, L.M., Häusl, F., Held, A. and Gekle, S.: Ejection of marine microplastics by raindrops: a computational and experimental study. Micropl.&Nanopl. 1, 18, (2021)
- Lehmann, M.: High Performance Free Surface LBM on GPUs. Master's thesis, (2019)
- Lehmann, M. and Gekle, S.: Analytic Solution to the Piecewise Linear Interface Construction Problem and Its Application in Curvature Calculation for Volume-of-Fluid Simulation Codes. Computation, 10, 21, (2022)
Contact
- FluidX3D is solo-developed and maintained by Dr. Moritz Lehmann.
- For any questions, feedback or other inquiries, contact me at dr.moritz.lehmann@gmail.com.
- Updates are posted on Mastodon via @ProjectPhysX/#FluidX3D and on YouTube.
Support
I'm developing FluidX3D in my spare time, to make computational fluid dynamics lightning fast, accessible on all hardware, and free for everyone.
- You can support FluidX3D by reporting any bugs or things that don't work in the issues. I'm welcoming feedback!
- If you like FluidX3D, share it with friends and colleagues. Spread the word that CFD is now lightning fast, accessible and free.
- If you want to support FluidX3D financially, you can sponsor me on GitHub or buy me a coffee. Thank you!