Awesome

ELSA

elsa is a tiny language designed to build intuition about how the Lambda Calculus, or more generally, computation-by-substitution works. Rather than the usual interpreter that grinds lambda terms down to values, elsa aims to be a light-weight proof checker that determines whether, under a given sequence of definitions, a particular term reduces to to another.

Online Demo

You can try elsa online at this link

Install

You can locally build and run elsa by

Installing stack
Cloning this repo
Building elsa with stack.

That is, to say

$ curl -sSL https://get.haskellstack.org/ | sh
$ git clone https://github.com/ucsd-progsys/elsa.git
$ cd elsa
$ stack install

Editor Plugins

VS Code extension with syntax highlighting and autocompletion support
- Source
- Contributed by @akainth015, based on the original version by @mistzzt
Vim

Overview

elsa programs look like:

-- id_0.lc
let id   = \x -> x
let zero = \f x -> x

eval id_zero :
  id zero
  =d> (\x -> x) (\f x -> x)   -- expand definitions
  =a> (\z -> z) (\f x -> x)   -- alpha rename
  =b> (\f x -> x)             -- beta reduce
  =d> zero                    -- expand definitions

eval id_zero_tr :
  id zero  
  =*> zero                    -- transitive reductions

When you run elsa on the above, you should get the following output:

$ elsa ex1.lc

OK id_zero, id_zero_tr.

Partial Evaluation

If instead you write a partial sequence of reductions, i.e. where the last term can still be further reduced:

-- succ_1_bad.lc
let one  = \f x -> f x
let two  = \f x -> f (f x)
let incr = \n f x -> f (n f x)

eval succ_one :
  incr one
  =d> (\n f x -> f (n f x)) (\f x -> f x)
  =b> \f x -> f ((\f x -> f x) f x)
  =b> \f x -> f ((\x -> f x) x)

Then elsa will complain that

$ elsa ex2.lc

ex2.lc:11:7-30: succ_one can be further reduced

  11  |   =b> \f x -> f ((\x -> f x) x)
              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You can fix the error by completing the reduction

-- succ_1.lc
let one  = \f x -> f x
let two  = \f x -> f (f x)
let incr = \n f x -> f (n f x)

eval succ_one :
  incr one
  =d> (\n f x -> f (n f x)) (\f x -> f x)
  =b> \f x -> f ((\f x -> f x) f x)
  =b> \f x -> f ((\x -> f x) x)
  =b> \f x -> f (f x)                 -- beta-reduce the above
  =d> two                             -- optional

Similarly, elsa rejects the following program,

-- id_0_bad.lc
let id   = \x -> x
let zero = \f x -> x

eval id_zero :
  id zero
  =b> (\f x -> x)
  =d> zero

with the error

$ elsa ex4.lc

ex4.lc:7:5-20: id_zero has an invalid beta-reduction

   7  |   =b> (\f x -> x)
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You can fix the error by inserting the appropriate intermediate term as shown in id_0.lc above.

Syntax of `elsa` Programs

An elsa program has the form

-- definitions
[let <id> = <term>]+

-- reductions
[<reduction>]*

where the basic elements are lambda-calulus terms

<term> ::=  <id>
          \ <id>+ -> <term>
            (<term> <term>)

and id are lower-case identifiers

<id>   ::= x, y, z, ...

A <reduction> is a sequence of terms chained together with a <step>

<reduction> ::= eval <id> : <term> (<step> <term>)*

<step>      ::= =a>   -- alpha equivalence
                =b>   -- beta  equivalence
                =d>   -- def   equivalence
                =*>   -- trans equivalence
                =~>   -- normalizes to

Semantics of `elsa` programs

A reduction of the form t_1 s_1 t_2 s_2 ... t_n is valid if

Each t_i s_i t_i+1 is valid, and
t_n is in normal form (i.e. cannot be further beta-reduced.)

Furthermore, a step of the form

t =a> t' is valid if t and t' are equivalent up to alpha-renaming,
t =b> t' is valid if t beta-reduces to t' in a single step,
t =d> t' is valid if t and t' are identical after let-expansion.
t =*> t' is valid if t and t' are in the reflexive, transitive closure of the union of the above three relations.
t =~> t' is valid if t normalizes to t'.

(Due to Michael Borkowski)

The difference between =*> and =~> is as follows.

t =*> t' is any sequence of zero or more steps from t to t'. So if you are working forwards from the start, backwards from the end, or a combination of both, you could use =*> as a quick check to see if you're on the right track.
t =~> t' says that t reduces to t' in zero or more steps and that t' is in normal form (i.e. t' cannot be reduced further). This means you can only place it as the final step.

So elsa would accept these three

eval ex1:
  (\x y -> x y) (\x -> x) b 
  =*> b

eval ex2:
  (\x y -> x y) (\x -> x) b 
  =~> b

eval ex3:
  (\x y -> x y) (\x -> x) (\z -> z) 
  =*> (\x -> x) (\z -> z) 
  =b> (\z -> z)

but elsa would not accept

eval ex3:
  (\x y -> x y) (\x -> x) (\z -> z) 
  =~> (\x -> x) (\z -> z) 
  =b> (\z -> z)

because the right hand side of =~> can still be reduced further.