Awesome
#Introduction
Extremely fast querystring parser with same API and semantics as qs
+ DoS Protection.
#Quick start
npm install querystringparser
var querystringparser = require("querystringparser");
querystringparser.parse("foo=bar");
#API
Exactly the same API and semantics are implemented 100% to make comparison fair.
DoS protection checks for input length, amount of total keys and maximum nesting depth of keys.
var qs = require("querystringparser");
qs.maxLength //Maximum amount of characters in the input string to parse: 32768
qs.maxKeys //Maximum amount of key-value pairs in the query string: 256
qs.maxDepth //Maximum nesting depth of keys: 4 e.g. a[b][c][d]=3
a RangeError
is thrown when these limits are reached.
#Performance
To run benchmarks run the bench
bash script while on the project root.
Platform info:
Windows_NT 6.1.7601 x64
Node.JS 0.11.8
V8 3.21.18.3
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2500K CPU @ 3.30GHz × 4
#Parse
Input:
a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&
a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&
a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&
a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[ ]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3
&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3
&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3
&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]= 3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=
3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=
3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=
3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=
3& a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3&a[]=3
Results:
querystringparser x 45,415 ops/sec ±0.10% (103 runs sampled)
qs x 3,372 ops/sec ±0.16% (100 runs sampled)
Input:
foo=bar
Results:
querystringparser x 1,708,245 ops/sec ±0.14% (97 runs sampled)
qs x 331,300 ops/sec ±0.19% (101 runs sampled)
Input:
user[name][first]=tj&user[name][last]=holowaychuk
Results:
querystringparser x 336,640 ops/sec ±0.13% (95 runs sampled)
qs x 77,368 ops/sec ±0.16% (100 runs sampled)
Input:
a[]=1&a[]=2&a[]=3
Results:
querystringparser x 1,418,693 ops/sec ±0.14% (98 runs sampled)
qs x 96,978 ops/sec ±0.14% (100 runs sampled)
#Stringify
Input:
{"cht":"p3","chd":"t:60,40","chs":"250x100","chl":"Hello|World"}
Results:
querystringparser x 282,700 ops/sec ±0.21% (99 runs sampled)
qs x 220,947 ops/sec ±0.26% (101 runs sampled)
Input:
{"foo":["bar"],"baz":["1","2","3"]}
Results:
querystringparser x 558,012 ops/sec ±0.42% (94 runs sampled)
qs x 410,148 ops/sec ±0.31% (98 runs sampled)
Input:
{"x":{"y":[{"z":"1","w":"2"}]}}
Results:
querystringparser x 479,991 ops/sec ±0.13% (99 runs sampled)
qs x 346,668 ops/sec ±0.21% (99 runs sampled)
Input:
{"foo":"bar","bar":"baz"}
Results:
querystringparser x 999,859 ops/sec ±0.19% (97 runs sampled)
qs x 690,273 ops/sec ±0.43% (96 runs sampled)