Awesome

OpenTelemetry Collector Contrib

This is a repository for OpenTelemetry Collector components that are not suitable for the core repository of the collector.

The official distributions, core and contrib, are available as part of the opentelemetry-collector-releases repository. Some of the components in this repository are part of the "core" distribution, such as the Jaeger and Prometheus components, but most of the components here are only available as part of the "contrib" distribution. Users of the OpenTelemetry Collector are also encouraged to build their own custom distributions with the OpenTelemetry Collector Builder, using the components they need from the core repository, the contrib repository, and possibly third-party or internal repositories.

Each component has its own support levels, as defined in the following sections. For each signal that a component supports, there's a stability level, setting the right expectations. It is possible then that a component will be Stable for traces but Alpha for metrics and Development for logs.

Stability levels

Stability level for components in this repository follow the definitions from the OpenTelemetry Collector repository.

Gated features

Some features are hidden behind feature gates before they are part of the main code path for the component. Note that the feature gates themselves might be at different lifecycle stages.

Support

Each component is supported either by the community of OpenTelemetry Collector Contrib maintainers, as defined by the GitHub group @open-telemetry/collector-contrib-maintainer, or by specific vendors. See the individual README files for information about the specific components.

The OpenTelemetry Collector Contrib maintainers may at any time downgrade specific components if they are deemed unmaintained or if they pose a risk to the repository and/or binary distribution.

Even though the OpenTelemetry Collector Contrib maintainers are ultimately responsible for the components hosted here, actual support will likely be provided by individual contributors, typically a code owner for the specific component.

Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md.

Triagers (@open-telemetry/collector-contrib-triagers)

• Benedikt Bongartz, Red Hat
• Florian Bacher, Dynatrace
• Jared Tan, DaoCloud
• Murphy Chen, DaoCloud
• Paulo Janotti, Splunk
• Vihas Makwana, Elastic
• Actively seeking contributors to triage issues

Emeritus Triagers:

• Alolita Sharma
• Gabriel Aszalos
• Goutham Veeramachaneni
• Punya Biswal
• Steve Flanders

Approvers (@open-telemetry/collector-contrib-approvers):

• Antoine Toulme, Splunk
• Christos Markou, Elastic
• Curtis Robert, Splunk (on leave)
• David Ashpole, Google
• Matt Wear, Lightstep
• Yang Song, DataDog
• Ziqi Zhao, Alibaba

Emeritus Approvers:

• Anthony Mirabella
• Bryan Aguilar
• Przemek Maciolek
• Ruslan Kovalov

Maintainers (@open-telemetry/collector-contrib-maintainer):

• Alex Boten, Honeycomb
• Andrzej Stencel, Elastic
• Bogdan Drutu, Snowflake
• Daniel Jaglowski, observIQ
• Dmitrii Anoshin, Splunk
• Evan Bradley, Dynatrace
• Juraci Paixão Kröhling, Grafana Labs
• Pablo Baeyens, DataDog
• Sean Marciniak, Splunk
• Tyler Helmuth, Honeycomb

Emeritus Maintainers

• Tigran Najaryan

Learn more about roles in the community repository.

PRs and Reviews

When creating a PR please follow the process described here.

New PRs will be automatically associated with the reviewers based on CODEOWNERS. PRs will be also automatically assigned to one of the maintainers or approvers for facilitation.

The facilitator is responsible for helping the PR author and reviewers to make progress or if progress cannot be made for closing the PR.

If the reviewers do not have approval rights the facilitator is also responsible for the official approval that is required for the PR to be merged and if the facilitator is a maintainer they are responsible for merging the PR as well.

The facilitator is not required to perform a thorough review, but they are encouraged to enforce Collector best practices and consistency across the codebase and component behavior. The facilitators will typically rely on codeowner's detailed review of the code when making the final approval decision.