Home

Awesome

<a href="https://terraform.io"> <img src=".github/tf.png" alt="Terraform logo" title="Terraform" align="left" height="50" /> </a> <a href="https://argoproj.github.io/cd"> <img src=".github/argo-cd.png" alt="Terraform logo" title="Terraform" align="right" height="50" /> </a>

Terraform Provider for ArgoCD

Tests

The ArgoCD Terraform Provider provides lifecycle management of ArgoCD resources.

NB: The provider is not concerned with the installation/configuration of ArgoCD itself. To make use of the provider, you will need to have an existing ArgoCD deployment and, the ArgoCD API server must be accessible from where you are running Terraform.

Documentation

Official documentation on how to use this provider can be found on the Terraform Registry.

Upgrading

Migrate provider source oboukili -> argoproj-labs

As announced in the releases v6.2.0 and v7.0.0, we moved the provider from "github.com/oboukili/terraform-provider-argocd/" to "github.com/argoproj-labs/terraform-provider-argocd". Users need to migrate their Terraform state according to HashiCorps replace-provider docs. In summary, you can do the following:

  1. List currently used providers

    $ terraform providers

Providers required by configuration:
.
├── provider[registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/helm] 2.15.0
├── (..)
└── provider[registry.terraform.io/oboukili/argocd] 6.1.1

Providers required by state:

    (..)

    provider[registry.terraform.io/oboukili/argocd]

    provider[registry.terraform.io/hashicorp/helm]

  2. If you see the provider "registry.terraform.io/oboukili/argocd", you can update the provider specification:

    --- a/versions.tf
+++ b/versions.tf
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ terraform {
    }
    argocd = {
-      source  = "oboukili/argocd"
+      source  = "argoproj-labs/argocd"
    version = "6.1.1"
    }
    helm = {

  3. Download the new provider via terraform init:

    $ terraform init
Initializing HCP Terraform...
Initializing provider plugins...
- Finding (..)
- Finding oboukili/argocd versions matching "6.1.1"...
- Finding latest version of argoproj-labs/argocd...
- (..)
- Installing oboukili/argocd v6.1.1...
- Installed oboukili/argocd v6.1.1 (self-signed, key ID 09A6EABF546E8638)
- Installing argoproj-labs/argocd v7.0.0...
- Installed argoproj-labs/argocd v7.0.0 (self-signed, key ID 6421DA8DFD8F48D0)
(..)

HCP Terraform has been successfully initialized!

(..)

  4. Then, execute the migration via terraform state replace-provider:

    $ terraform state replace-provider registry.terraform.io/oboukili/argocd registry.terraform.io/argoproj-labs/argocd
Terraform will perform the following actions:

~ Updating provider:
    - registry.terraform.io/oboukili/argocd
    + registry.terraform.io/argoproj-labs/argocd

Changing 5 resources:

argocd_project.apps_with_clusterroles
argocd_application.app_of_apps
argocd_project.base
argocd_project.apps_restricted
argocd_project.core_services_unrestricted

Do you want to make these changes?
Only 'yes' will be accepted to continue.

Enter a value: yes

Successfully replaced provider for 5 resources.

  5. You have successfully migrated

Compatibility promise

This provider is compatible with at least the last 2 minor releases of ArgoCD (e.g, ranging from 1.(n).m, to 1.(n-1).0, where n is the latest available minor version).

Older releases are not supported and some resources may not work as expected.

Motivations

I thought ArgoCD already allowed for 100% declarative configuration?

While that is true through the use of ArgoCD Kubernetes Custom Resources, there are some resources that simply cannot be managed using Kubernetes manifests, such as project roles JWTs whose respective lifecycles are better handled by a tool like Terraform. Even more so when you need to export these JWTs to another external system using Terraform, like a CI platform.

Wouldn't using a Kubernetes provider to handle ArgoCD configuration be enough?

Existing Kubernetes providers do not patch arrays of objects, losing project role JWTs when doing small project changes just happen.

ArgoCD Kubernetes admission webhook controller is not as exhaustive as ArgoCD API validation, this can be seen with RBAC policies, where no validation occur when creating/patching a project.

Using Terraform to manage Kubernetes Custom Resource becomes increasingly difficult the further you use HCL2 DSL to merge different data structures and want to preserve type safety.

Whatever the Kubernetes CRD provider you are using, you will probably end up using locals and the yamlencode function which does not preserve the values' type. In these cases, not only the readability of your Terraform plan will worsen, but you will also be losing some safeties that Terraform provides in the process.

Requirements

Credits