Home

Awesome

CinePile fine tune

CinePile Benchmark - Open vs Closed models

What can you find in this repo

Results

Video multimodal research often emphasizes activity recognition and object-centered tasks, such as determining "what is the person wearing a red hat doing?" However, this focus overlooks areas like theme exploration, narrative and plot analysis, and character and relationship dynamics. CinePile addresses these areas in their benchmark and they find that Large Language Models significantly lag behind human performance in these tasks. Additionally, there is a notable disparity in performance between open and closed models.

In our initial fine-tuning, our goal was to assess how well open models can approach the performance of closed models. By fine-tuning Video LlaVa, we achieved performance levels comparable to those of Claude 3 (Opus).

ModelAverageCharacter and relationship dynamicsNarrative and Plot AnalysisSetting and Technical AnalysisTemporalTheme Exploration
Human73.2182.92757375.5264.93
Human (authors)869287.571.210075
GPT-4o59.7264.3674.0854.7744.9167.89
GPT-4 Vision58.8163.7373.4352.5546.2265.79
Gemini 1.5 Pro61.3665.1771.0159.5746.7563.27
Gemini 1.5 Flash57.5261.9169.1554.8641.3461.22
Gemini Pro Vision50.6454.1665.546.9735.858.82
Claude 3 (Opus)45.648.8957.8840.7337.6547.89
Video LlaVa - this fine-tune44.1645.2645.1446.9332.5549.47
Video LLaVa22.5123.1125.9220.6922.3822.63
mPLUG-Owl10.5710.6511.049.1811.8915.05
Video-ChatGPT14.5516.0214.8315.546.8818.86
MovieChat4.614.954.295.232.484.21

Fine-tuned model taking as bases Video-LlaVA to evaluate its performance on CinePile.

Model Sources

Hugging Face model card and weights

Uses

Although the model can answer questions based on the content, it is specifically optimized for addressing CinePile-related queries. When the questions do not follow a CinePile-specific prompt, the inference section of the notebook is designed to refine and clean up the text produced by the model.