Awesome
<!-- README.md is generated from README.Rmd. Please edit that file -->TDAvis <img src="man/figures/logo.png" align="right" width="120" style="padding-left:10px;background-color:white;" />
<!-- badges: start --> <!-- badges: end -->TDAvis extends ggplot2
for visualizing common tools from Topological Data
Analysis
(TDA). The visualization of Rips complexes is implemented with
geom_simplicial_complex()
. Persistence homologies can be visualized
via either barcode charts or persistence diagrams with geom_barcode()
or geom_persistence()
, respectively.
Note: We are currently working on combining TDAvis' capabilities with ggtda, stay tuned for updates!
Installation
You can install the development version of TDAvis from GitHub with:
# install.packages("remotes")
remotes:install_github("jamesotto852/TDAvis")
Simplicial Complexes
Let’s consider a simple data set to illustrate the use of these tools:
library("ggplot2")
glimpse(df)
#> Rows: 50
#> Columns: 2
#> $ x <dbl> 0.14236715, -0.05976043, -0.10641715, -0.77666623, -0.05489406, 0.85…
#> $ y <dbl> -0.876380809, 0.920098191, -0.939728919, -0.314141159, 1.122565159, …
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_point() +
coord_fixed()
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-3-1.png" width="100%" />
For details on how df
was created, see the section on generating data
with algstat at the end of this
document.
In TDA, it is very common to create a simplicial complex based on point cloud data. These complexes have well-defined topological features which may relate back to the probability structure governing the sample of points. Informally, the topological features of interest correspond to holes of various dimensions (or more accurately, to “cycles”).
Typically, the Rips
complex is
used as it is relatively simple to compute. Loosely, the Rips complex
identifies groups of
points that are all within a pairwise distance of each other as
-dimensional
simplexes. In TDAvis, geom_simplicial_complex()
plots the Rips
complex for a 2-dimensional data set given a value of radius
:
library("TDAvis")
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_simplicial_complex(radius = .4) +
coord_fixed()
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-4-1.png" width="100%" />
Notice, the object in the plot above clearly has a “hole”. This kind of insight is one of the main motivators of TDA. We’ll see more formal ways of identifying relevant features like this after we discuss persistent homology in the next section.
By default, the dimension of each simplex is communicated via opactiy
(the alpha
aesthetic). In the next example, we’ll see how this is
useful when plotting data with multiple groups. However, when we’re just
interested in one complex it can be helpful to instead map the computed
variable dim
to the fill
aesthetic, setting alpha
:
ggplot(df, aes(x, y)) +
geom_simplicial_complex(
mapping = aes(fill = after_stat(dim)),
alpha = .5, radius = .4
) +
coord_fixed()
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-5-1.png" width="100%" />
Plotting multiple groups
Now, we’ll look at df_groups
. This data is similar to df
, but now
with two labeled groups, a
and b
:
glimpse(df_groups)
#> Rows: 100
#> Columns: 3
#> $ x <dbl> -0.05067197, 1.51263915, 0.67222711, -0.11922006, 0.65633027, 0.31…
#> $ y <dbl> -0.5825551, 1.0206963, 0.3998390, 1.2577820, -0.1532893, 1.2202389…
#> $ lab <chr> "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "b", "a", "…
ggplot(df_groups, aes(x, y, fill = lab)) +
geom_point(shape = 21) +
coord_fixed()
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-6-1.png" width="100%" />
It is simple to plot the Rips complexes for multiple groups by mapping
to the fill
aesthetic:
ggplot(df_groups, aes(x, y, fill = lab)) +
geom_simplicial_complex(radius = .4) +
coord_fixed()
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-7-1.png" width="100%" />
It is also possible to use the fill
aesthetic to visualize the simplex
dimensions. Typically, faceting the resulting plot is a good idea:
ggplot(df_groups, aes(x, y)) +
geom_simplicial_complex(
mapping = aes(fill = after_stat(dim)),
alpha = .5, radius = .4
) +
facet_wrap(vars(lab), ncol = 1) +
coord_fixed()
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-8-1.png" width="100%" />
In each example so far, the plots have depended heavily on the choice of
radius
. In reality, we tend to be interested in considering the
topological features of complexes generated by all reasonable values of
radius
. The gif below illustrates this point, observe how features
appear and disappear in each of the subplots as the “bubbles” increase
in size.
This is what motivates the tools of persistent homology!
Perstistent Homology
In the above animation, we see the structure of the Rips complexes change as the radii increase. For example, in the top right plot we see two disconnected components that last a couple of seconds. In the bottom right plot, the central hole is present for almost the entire animation. In the first plot, we see quite a few short-lived holes, but overall there are no features that persist for more than a few frames.
Intuitively, when the difference in “time” between a topological feature’s birth and death is larger, that is an indication that the feature might be important. A way to visualize the persistence of topological features are barcode charts. Each feature is plotted as a horizontal line, marking its birth and death in terms of the value of the Rips complex’s diameter parameter.
Below, we have plotted the barcode chart for df
using
geom_barcode()
.
ggplot() +
geom_barcode(point_cloud = df) +
scale_color_viridis_d(end = .7)
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-9-1.png" width="100%" />
Notice the single long-lived feature, the one dimensional hole. This
corresponds to the feature we observed previously, with
geom_simplicial_complex()
!
Another way to plot persistent homologies is persistence diagrams, in which topological features are plotted as points with values correspond to their birth and death times:
ggplot() +
geom_persistence(point_cloud = df) +
geom_abline() +
scale_color_viridis_d(end = .7)
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-10-1.png" width="100%" />
Again, we see the single significant one-dimensional feature—the hole!
In both of these examples, we haven’t supplied anything to the data
argument of ggplot()
. Instead, we set point_cloud = df
in each
geom_
function. These functions are similar to geom_function()
in
that they do not require any aesthetics and can create plots with the
default value of data = NULL
. However, there is another way to supply
data via aesthetic mappings: the point_data
aesthetic.
The point_data
aesthetic
Both geom_barcode()
and geom_persistence()
accept the optional
point_data
aesthetic. This aesthetic is different from the typical
ggplot2 aesthetics—it needs to be pointing at a list column with
data.frame
elements. For example, see how we construct df_nested
:
library("tidyverse")
df_nested <-
df_groups |>
group_by(lab) |>
nest()
df_nested
#> # A tibble: 2 × 2
#> # Groups: lab [2]
#> lab data
#> <chr> <list>
#> 1 a <tibble [50 × 2]>
#> 2 b <tibble [50 × 2]>
This approach allows for easy faceting. See below how we plot barcode
charts for each group in df_group
:
ggplot(df_nested) +
geom_barcode(aes(point_data = data)) +
facet_wrap(vars(lab), ncol = 1) +
scale_color_viridis_d(end = .7)
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-12-1.png" width="100%" />
Similarly, we can plot multiple persistence diagrams:
ggplot(df_nested) +
geom_persistence(aes(point_data = data)) +
geom_abline() +
facet_wrap(vars(lab)) +
scale_color_viridis_d(end = .7)
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-13-1.png" width="100%" />
Note: either the point_data
aesthetic or the point_cloud
argument
must be specified. Also, if the point_data
aesthetic is mapped to,
it is important that each group of the data only correspond to one row
in data
. This can be acheived via faceting or mapping to aesthetics
like color
or linetype
.
Generating Data
As mentioned previously, the data sets used in this document have been
generated via algstat.
Specifically, they were sampled via algstat::rvnorm()
which samples
from a normal distribution centered on a
variety (loosely, the
zero level set of a polynomial).
In the case of df
and df_groups
, the data corresponds to the variety
of
:
set.seed(0)
p <- mp("(x^2 + y^2 - 1)^3 - x^2 y^3")
df <- rvnorm(500, p, .04, "tibble", chains = 8) |>
slice_sample(n = 50) |> # downsampling for "thinning"
select(x, y)
df_groups <-
rvnorm(500, p, .04, "tibble", chains = 8) |>
slice_sample(n = 100) |>
select(x, y) |>
mutate(
x = x + rep(c(-.5, .5), length.out = 100),
lab = rep(c("a", "b"), length.out = 100)
)
The variety we have been considering is relatively simple. For a more interesting example, we can consider a polynomial whose variety is a Lissajous curve:
library("patchwork")
set.seed(1)
df_lissajous <- rvnorm(500, lissajous(3, 3, 0, 0), .014, "tibble", chains = 8) |>
select(x, y) |>
slice_sample(n = 500)
#> Compiling model... done.
p_scatterplot <-
ggplot(df_lissajous, aes(x, y)) +
geom_point() +
coord_fixed()
p_complex <-
ggplot(df_lissajous, aes(x, y)) +
geom_simplicial_complex(
aes(fill = after_stat(dim)), alpha = .4,
diameter = .12, zero_skeleton = FALSE) +
coord_fixed()
p_scatterplot + p_complex
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-15-1.png" width="100%" />
ggplot() +
geom_persistence(point_cloud = df_lissajous) +
geom_abline() +
scale_color_viridis_d(end = .7)
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-16-1.png" width="100%" />
ggplot() +
geom_barcode(point_cloud = df_lissajous) +
scale_color_viridis_d(end = .7)
<img src="man/figures/README-unnamed-chunk-16-2.png" width="100%" />
<!-- Potential includes: -->
<!-- - Algstat data -->
<!-- - Related projects -->
<!-- - What's coming section -->
<!-- - Persistence w/ CI -->
<!-- - Other complexes for geom_simplicial_complex() -->