Awesome

DCR-Consistency: Divide-Conquer-Reasoning for Consistency Evaluation and Improvement of Large Language Models

🤔 What is DCR-Consistency

DCR-Consistency is a novel framework that uses LLM agents to detect and mitigate inconsistencies, or in other words hallucinations. It takes advantage of LLM's power in semantic understanding while circumventing known pitfalls such as relatively poor performance in math. For more details please see our paper.

Given a reference as the ground truth and a candidate to evaluate, it will output a numeric score between [0, 1] indicating its consistency where 0 means no sentence in the candidate is consistent and 1 otherwise. It also outputs a list of reasons about why this score is generated. Better yet, based on such reasons, it can improve the candidate and mitigate detected inconsistencies.

It is composed of three parts:

• DCE takes a reference and a candidate, evaluates the consistency between the two on a sentence level, and outputs a list of reasons on the consistency check for each sentence in the candidate.
• AMC takes the output of DCE and converts it to a numeric score between [0, 1]
• RAI takes the reasons output of DCE and generates improved versions that mitigate detected inconsistencies.

😋 How well does DCR-Consistency work?

We evaluated the DCR-Consistency framework on a wide range of datasets: QQP, PAWS-QQP, SummEval, QAGS-CNN, and QAGS-XSUM.

Below is a comparison of DCR-Consistency with some start of art metrics on the SummEval dataset about consistency. We included prestigious metrics like BERTScore, and trending new ones leveraging LLMs(GPT-3.5/4) such as G-Eval as well. DCR-Consistency is outperforming those metrics by a large margin.

We also evaluated DCR-Consistency's effectiveness on inconsistency migration. Below is an illustration showing the consistency rate changes after iterations of applying DCR-Consistency. We observe effective mitigations in all three datasets and that 100% migration of detected inconsistency can be achieved within three rounds.

🤖 Installation

• Ensure you have python >= 3.9
• Clone this repo and install it with

pip install . 

DCR-Consistency can also be installed directly from pip(coming soon!)

pip install dcr-consistency

🚀 Quickstart

The easiest way to start is to play with the example in examples/example.py. To do so:

• Install the DCR-Consistency package with steps above
• Install the necessary packages with command below (example use additional dependencies such as openai):

pip install -r examples/requirements_example.txt

• update the api_key variable with your apikey.
• run the example with

python examples/example.py

📃 Usage

Evaluation

res = evaluate(_your_LLM_, _your_model_config_, data, worker_count=5)

• your_LLM: This will be your own object that handles communication with LLM. It should follow the contract of LLM abstract class. This allows freedom of using whatever LLM you desire. An example can be found here
• your_model_config: This will be whatever parameter your LLM needs. An example can be found here
• worker_count: This configures the number of threads to run the program
• data: The data filed will be a list of data to run. By default each item in it should be a dict containing fields id, reference and candidate. The returned item will be the original data passed in joined with the columns below:

Inconsistency Mitigation

res = improve(_your_LLM_, _your_model_config_, data, worker_count=5)

• your_LLM: This will be your own object that handles communication with LLM. It should follow the contract of LLM abstract class. This allows freedom of using whatever LLM you desire. An example can be found here
• your_model_config: This will be whatever parameter your LLM needs. An example can be found here
• worker_count: This configures the number of threads to run the program
• data: The data filed will be a list of data to run. By default each item in it should be a dict containing fields id, article and sentences. article is the reference passed into evaluator. sentences can be extracted from the output evaluator. It is a list holding information on what the original sentences are and whether each sentence is or is not consistent compared to the reference and the reasons. The returned item will be the original data passed in joined with the columns below:

👏Contributing

See CONTRIBUTING.md.

💁Citation

@inproceedings{cui2023dcr,
      title={DCR-Consistency: Divide-Conquer-Reasoning for Consistency Evaluation and Improvement of Large Language Models},
      author={Wendi Cui, Jiaxin Zhang, Zhuohang Li, Damien Lopez, Kamalika Das, Bradley Malin, Sricharan Kumar},
      booktitle={arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.02132},
      year={2023},
      primaryClass={cs.CL}
}