Awesome
TRADES-random-smoothing
This is the code for JMLR paper "Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify Robustness for High-Dimensional Images" by Avrim Blum (TTIC), Travis Dick (U. of Pennsylvania), Naren Manoj (TTIC), and Hongyang Zhang (TTIC), ordered alphabetically.
TRADES + Random Smoothing achieves SOTA certified robustness in norm at radius 2/255.
Prerequisites
- Python (3.6.4)
- Pytorch (0.4.1)
- CUDA
- numpy
Install
We suggest to install the dependencies using Anaconda or Miniconda. Here is an exemplary command:
$ wget https://repo.anaconda.com/archive/Anaconda3-5.1.0-Linux-x86_64.sh
$ bash Anaconda3-5.1.0-Linux-x86_64.sh
$ source ~/.bashrc
$ conda install pytorch=0.4.1
TRADES+Random Smooth: A New Training Method for Certifiable Robustness
We used TRADES [paper] to train a soft-random-smoothing classifier by injecting Gaussian noise. The method minimizes empirical risk of a regularized surrogate loss L(.,.) (e.g., the cross-entropy loss) with Gaussian noise:
Running Demos
Certified robustness at radius 2/255:
- Train ResNet-110 model on CIFAR10:
$ python code/train_trades.py --epsilon 0.435 --imagesize 32 --noise_sd 0.12 --model-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise12_size32_l2trades0435_beta6_dir'
- Certify ResNet-110 model on CIFAR10:
$ python code/certify_trades.py cifar10 --imagesize 32 --sigma 0.12 --outfile 'results/output_noise12_size32_l2trades0435_beta6_full' --skip 1 --batch 10000 --load-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise12_size32_l2trades0435_beta6/model-res110-epoch.pt'
- Benchmark on certified robustness at radius 2/255 on CIFAR-10:
Method | Robust Accuracy | Natural Accuracy |
---|---|---|
TRADES + Random Smoothing | 62.6% | 78.7% |
Salman et al. (2019) | 60.8% | 82.1% |
Zhang et al. (2020) | 54.0% | 72.0% |
Wong et al. (2018) | 53.9% | 68.3% |
Mirman et al. (2018) | 52.2% | 62.0% |
Gowal et al. (2018) | 50.0% | 70.2% |
Xiao et al. (2019) | 45.9% | 61.1% |
Effectiveness of lower bound:
- Train ResNet-110 models of varying input sizes (32, 48, 64) on CIFAR10:
$ python code/train_trades.py --epsilon 0.435 --imagesize 32 --noise_sd 0.12 --model-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise12_size32_l2trades0435_beta6_dir'
$ python code/train_trades.py --epsilon 0.6525 --imagesize 48 --noise_sd 0.18 --model-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise18_size48_l2trades06525_beta6_dir'
$ python code/train_trades.py --epsilon 0.87 --imagesize 64 --noise_sd 0.24 --model-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise24_size64_l2trades087_beta6_dir'
- Certify ResNet-110 models of varying input sizes (32, 48, 64) on CIFAR10:
$ python code/certify_trades.py cifar10 --imagesize 32 --sigma 0.12 --outfile 'results/output_noise12_size32_l2trades0435_beta6' --skip 20 --batch 10000 --load-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise12_size32_l2trades0435_beta6_dir/model-res110-epoch.pt'
$ python code/certify_trades.py cifar10 --imagesize 48 --sigma 0.18 --outfile 'results/output_noise18_size48_l2trades06525_beta6' --skip 20 --batch 10000 --load-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise18_size48_l2trades06525_beta6_dir/model-res110-epoch.pt'
$ python code/certify_trades.py cifar10 --imagesize 64 --sigma 0.24 --outfile 'results/output_noise24_size64_l2trades087_beta6' --skip 20 --batch 10000 --load-dir 'checkpoints/model_noise24_size64_l2trades087_beta6_dir/model-res110-epoch.pt'
- Analyze results:
$ python code/analyze.py
<p align="center">
<img src="results/vary_dim_cifar10_trades.png" width="450"\>
</p>
<p align="center">
It shows that the three curves of varying input sizes behave similarly. This empirically supports that the certified robust radius ε should be proportional to the quantity .
Reference
For technical details and full experimental results, please check the paper.
@article{blum2020random,
author = {Avrim Blum and Travis Dick and Naren Manoj and Hongyang Zhang},
title = {Random Smoothing Might be Unable to Certify $\ell_\infty$ Robustness for High-Dimensional Images},
journal = {Journal of Machine Learning Research},
year = {2020}
}
Contact
Please contact hongyanz@ttic.edu if you have any question on the codes. Enjoy!