Home

Awesome

<p align="center" width="100%"> </p> <div id="top" align="center">

Explore-Instruct: Enhancing Domain-Specific Instruction Coverage through Active Exploration

<img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Version-1.0.0-blue.svg" alt="Version"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/License-Apache_2.0-green.svg" alt="License"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/stars/fanqiwan/Explore-Instruct?color=yellow" alt="Stars"> <img src="https://img.shields.io/github/issues/fanqiwan/Explore-Instruct?color=red" alt="Issues"> <h4> |<a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.09168"> 📑 Paper </a> | <a href="https://huggingface.co/collections/Wanfq/explore-instruct-65280973f74b8bf3e9f9bd7e"> 🤗 HuggingFace Repo </a> | <a href="https://github.com/fanqiwan/Explore-Instruct"> 🐱 GitHub Repo </a> | </h4> <!-- **Authors:** -->

Fanqi Wan<sup></sup>, Xinting Huang<sup></sup>, Tao Yang<sup></sup>, Xiaojun Quan<sup></sup>, Wei Bi<sup></sup>, Shuming Shi<sup></sup>

<!-- **Affiliations:** -->

<sup></sup> Sun Yat-sen University, <sup></sup> Tencent AI Lab

</div>

News

Contents

Overview

We propose Explore-Instruct, a novel approach to enhancing domain-specific instruction coverage. We posit that the domain space is inherently structured akin to a tree, reminiscent of cognitive science ontologies. Drawing from the essence of classical search algorithms and incorporating the power of LLMs, Explore-Instruct is conceived to actively traverse the domain space and generate instruction-tuning data, not necessitating a predefined tree structure. Specifically, Explore-Instruct employs two strategic operations: lookahead and backtracking exploration:

<p align="center"> <img src="./assets/fig2.png" width="95%"> <br> </p>

Data Release

We release the Explore-Instruct data in brainstorming, rewriting, and math domains on 🤗 Huggingface Datasets. Each domain includes two versions of datasets: the basic and extended version. The base version contains 10k instruction-tuning data and the extended version contains 16k, 32k, and 64k instruction-tuning data for each domain respectively. Each dataset is a structured data file in the JSON format. It consists of a list of dictionaries, with each dictionary containing the following fields:

The results of data-centric analysis are shown as follows:

<p align="left"> <img src="./assets/fig1.png" width="50%"> <br> </p>
MethodBrainstorming Unique<br/>V-N pairsRewriting Unique<br/>V-N pairsMath Unique<br/>V-N pairs
Domain-Specific Human-Curated283
Domain-Aware Self-Instruct7811715451
Explore-Instruct7902015917

Model Release

We release the Explore-LM models in brainstorming, rewriting, and math domains on 🤗 Huggingface Models. Each domain includes two versions of models: the basic and extended version trained with the corresponding version of dataset.

The results of automatic and human evaluation in three domains are shown as follows:

Automatic Comparison in the Brainstorming DomainWin:Tie:LoseBeat Rate
Explore-LM vs Domain-Curated-LM194:1:1393.72
Explore-LM-Ext vs Domain-Curated-LM196:1:1194.69
Explore-LM vs Domain-Instruct-LM114:56:3875.00
Explore-LM-Ext vs Domain-Instruct-LM122:55:3179.74
Explore-LM vs ChatGPT52:71:8537.96
Explore-LM-Ext vs ChatGPT83:69:5659.71
Automatic Comparison in the Rewriting DomainWin:Tie:LoseBeat Rate
Explore-LM vs Domain-Curated-LM50:38:689.29
Explore-LM-Ext vs Domain-Curated-LM53:37:492.98
Explore-LM vs Domain-Instruct-LM34:49:1175.56
Explore-LM-Ext vs Domain-Instruct-LM35:53:685.37
Explore-LM vs ChatGPT11:59:2431.43
Explore-LM-Ext vs ChatGPT12:56:2631.58
Automatic Comparison in the Math DomainAccuracy Rate
Domain-Curated-LM3.4
Domain-Instruct-LM4.0
Explore-LM6.8
Explore-LM-Ext8.4
ChatGPT34.8
<p align="left"> <img src="./assets/fig5.png" width="95%"> <br> </p>

Data Generation Process

To generate the domain-specific instruction-tuning data, please follow the following commands step by step:

Domain Space Exploration

python3 generate_instruction.py \
    --action extend \
    --save_dir ./en_data/demo_domain \  # input dir include current domain tree for exploration 
    --out_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_exploration \  # output dir of the explored new domain tree
    --lang <LANGUAGE> \  # currently support 'en'
    --domain demo_domain \  # domain for exploration
    --extend_nums <TASK_NUMBER_DEPTH_0>,...,<TASK_NUMBER_DEPTH_MAX_DEPTH-1> \  # exploration breadth at each depth 
    --max_depth <MAX_DEPTH> \  # exploration depth
    --assistant_name <ASSISTANT_NAME>  # currently support openai and claude

Instruction-Tuning Data Generation

python3 generate_instruction.py \
    --action enrich \
    --save_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_exploration \  # input dir include current domain tree for data generation 
    --out_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_generation \  # output dir of the domain tree with generated data
    --lang <LANGUAGE> \  # currently support 'en'
    --domain demo_domain \  # domain for exploration
    --enrich_nums <DATA_NUMBER_DEPTH_0>,...,<DATA_NUMBER_DEPTH_MAX_DEPTH> \  # data number for task at each depth 
    --enrich_batch_size <BATCH_SIZE> \  # batch size for data generation
    --assistant_name <ASSISTANT_NAME>  # currently support openai and claude

Task Pruning

python3 generate_instruction.py \
    --action prune \
    --save_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_generation \  # input dir include current domain tree for task pruning 
    --out_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_pruning \  # output dir of the domain tree with 'pruned_subtasks_name.json' file
    --lang <LANGUAGE> \  # currently support 'en'
    --domain demo_domain \  # domain for exploration
    --pruned_file ./en_data/demo_domain_pruning/pruned_subtasks_name.json \  # file of pruned tasks
    --prune_threshold <PRUNE_THRESHOLD> \  # threshold of rouge-l overlap between task names
    --assistant_name <ASSISTANT_NAME>  # currently support openai and claude

Data Filtering

python3 generate_instruction.py \
    --action filter \
    --save_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_pruning \  # input dir include current domain tree for data filtering 
    --out_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_filtering \  # output dir of the domain tree with fitered data
    --lang <LANGUAGE> \  # currently support 'en'
    --domain demo_domain \  # domain for exploration
    --pruned_file ./en_data/demo_domain_pruning/pruned_subtasks_name.json \  # file of pruned tasks
    --filter_threshold <FILTER_THRESHOLD> \  # threshold of rouge-l overlap between instructions
    --assistant_name <ASSISTANT_NAME>  # currently support openai and claude

Data Sampling

python3 generate_instruction.py \
    --action sample \
    --save_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_filtering \  # input dir include current domain tree for data sampling 
    --out_dir ./en_data/demo_domain_sampling \  # output dir of the domain tree with sampled data
    --lang <LANGUAGE> \  # currently support 'en'
    --domain demo_domain \  # domain for exploration
    --pruned_file ./en_data/demo_domain_filtering/pruned_subtasks_name.json \  # file of pruned tasks
    --sample_example_num <SAMPLE_EXAMPLES_NUM> \  # number of sampled examples
    --sample_max_depth <SAMPLE_MAX_DEPTH> \  # max depth for data sampling
    --sample_use_pruned \  # do not sample from pruned tasks
    --assistant_name <ASSISTANT_NAME>  # currently support openai and claude

Fine-tuning

We fine-tune LLaMA-7B with the following hyperparameters:

HyperparameterGlobal Batch SizeLearning rateEpochsMax lengthWeight decay
LLaMA 7B1282e-535120

To reproduce the training procedure, please use the following command:

deepspeed --num_gpus=8 ./train/train.py \
    --deepspeed ./deepspeed_config/deepspeed_zero3_offload_config.json \
    --model_name_or_path decapoda-research/llama-7b-hf \
    --data_path ./en_data/demo_domain_sampling \
    --fp16 True \
    --output_dir ./training_results/explore-lm-7b-demo-domain \
    --num_train_epochs 3 \
    --per_device_train_batch_size 2 \
    --per_device_eval_batch_size 2 \
    --gradient_accumulation_steps 8 \
    --evaluation_strategy "no" \
    --model_max_length 512 \
    --save_strategy "steps" \
    --save_steps 2000 \
    --save_total_limit 1 \
    --learning_rate 2e-5 \
    --weight_decay 0. \
    --warmup_ratio 0.03 \
    --lr_scheduler_type "cosine" \
    --logging_steps 1 \
    --prompt_type alpaca \
    2>&1 | tee ./training_logs/explore-lm-7b-demo-domain.log

python3 ./train/zero_to_fp32.py \
    --checkpoint_dir ./training_results/explore-lm-7b-demo-domain \
    --output_file ./training_results/explore-lm-7b-demo-domain/pytorch_model.bin

Evaluation

The evaluation datasets for different domains are as follows:

The evaluation metrics for different domains are as follows:

The automatic evaluation commands for different domains are as follows:

# Brainstorming and Rewriting Domain

# 1. Inference
python3 ./eval/generate.py \
    --model_id <MODEL_ID> \
    --model_path <MODEL_PATH> \
    --question_file ./eval/question/en_eval_set.jsonl \
    --answer_file ./eval/answer/<MODEL_ID>.jsonl \
    --num_gpus 8 \
    --num_beams 1 \
    --temperature 0.7 \
    --max_new_tokens 512 \
    --prompt_type alpaca \
    --do_sample

# 2. Evaluation
python3 ./eval/chatgpt_score.py \
    --baseline_file ./eval/answer/<MODEL_1>.jsonl \  # answer of baseline model to compare with
    --answer_file ./eval/answer/<MODEL_2>.jsonl \  # answer of evaluation model
    --review_file ./eval/review/<MODEL_1>_cp_<MODEL_2>_<DOMAIN>.jsonl \  # review from chatgpt
    --prompt_file ./eval/prompt/en_review_prompt_compare.jsonl \  # evaluation prompt for chatgpt
    --target_classes <DOMAIN> \  # evaluation domain
    --batch_size <BATCH_SIZE> \
    --review_model "gpt-3.5-turbo-0301"
# Math Domain

# 1. Inference
python3 ./eval/generate.py \
    --model_id <MODEL_ID> \
    --model_path <MODEL_PATH> \
    --question_file ./eval/question/MATH_eval_set_sample.jsonl \
    --answer_file ./eval/answer/<MODEL_ID>.jsonl \
    --num_gpus 8 \
    --num_beams 10 \
    --temperature 1.0 \
    --max_new_tokens 512 \
    --prompt_type alpaca

# 2. Evaluation
python3 ./eval/auto_eval.py \
    --question_file ./eval/question/MATH_eval_set_sample.jsonl \
    --answer_file ./eval/answer/<MODEL_ID>.jsonl  # answer of evaluation model

Limitations

Explore-Instruct is still under development and needs a lot of improvements. We acknowledge that our work focuses on the enhancement of domain-specific instruction coverage and does not address other aspects of instruction-tuning, such as the generation of complex and challenging instructions or the mitigation of toxic and harmful instructions. Future work is needed to explore the potential of our approach in these areas.

Citation

If you find this work is relevant with your research or applications, please feel free to cite our work!

@inproceedings{wan2023explore,
  title={Explore-Instruct: Enhancing Domain-Specific Instruction Coverage through Active Exploration},
  author={Wan, Fanqi and Huang, Xinting and Yang, Tao and Quan, Xiaojun and Bi, Wei and Shi, Shuming},
  booktitle={Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing},
  pages={9435--9454},
  year={2023}
}