Home

Awesome

npm version deps codecov Build Status

What is decapi?

demo

decapi is a set of decorators for creating GraphQL APIs in typescript. Write your types and GQL schema at once killing two birds with one stone.

decapitation

Examples:

Basic example

Example below is able to resolve such query

query {
  hello(name: "Bob") # will resolve to 'Hello, Bob!'
}
import { SchemaRoot, Query, compileSchema } from 'decapi'

@SchemaRoot()
class SuperSchema {
  @Query()
  hello(name: string): string {
    return `Hello, ${name}!`
  }
}

const compiledSchema = compileSchema(SuperSchema)

compiledSchema is a regular GQL executable schema compatible with graphql-js library.

To use it with apollo-server, you'd have to use like this:

import ApolloServer from 'apollo-server'

const server = new ApolloServer({ schema, graphiql: true })

server.listen(3000, () =>
  console.log('Graphql API ready on http://localhost:3000/graphql')
)

Although it is encouraged to prefer fastify as it is a bit faster when used with jit.

Adding nested types

For now, our query field returned scalar (string). Let's return something more complex. Schema will look like:

mutation {
  createProduct(name: "Chair", price: 99.99) {
    name
    price
    isExpensive
  }
}

Such query will have a bit more code and here it is:

import {
  SchemaRoot,
  Query,
  ObjectType,
  Field,
  Mutation,
  compileSchema
} from 'decapi'

@ObjectType({ description: 'Simple product object type' })
class Product {
  @Field()
  name: string

  @Field()
  price: number

  @Field()
  isExpensive() {
    return this.price > 50
  }
}

@SchemaRoot()
class SuperSchema {
  @Mutation()
  createProduct(name: string, price: number): Product {
    const product = new Product()
    product.name = name
    product.price = price
    return product
  }
}

const compiledSchema = compileSchema(SuperSchema)

Type inference from typescript

These cases are supported by decapi 2/typescript-rtti:

All other code-first libraries on decorators like typegraphql or typegql require you to write types for these twice. Decapi infers types from typescript without any extra effort on your end.

Even in decapi 2 onward you still can write an explicit type. There are situations when typescript types are not precise enough- for example you want to be explicit about if some number type is Float or Int (GraphQLFloat or GraphQLInt).

Let's modify our Product so it has additional categories field that will return array of strings. For the sake of readability, let's ommit all fields we've defined previously.

@ObjectType()
class Product {
  @Field({ type: [String] }) // note we can use any native type like GraphQLString!
  categories(): string[] {
    return ['Tables', 'Furniture']
  }
}

We've added { type: [String] } as @Field options. Type can be anything that is resolvable to GraphQL type

Writing Asynchronously

Every field function we write can be async and return Promise. Let's say, instead of hard-coding our categories, we want to fetch it from some external API:

@ObjectType()
class Product {
  @Field({ type: [String] }) // note we can use any native type like GraphQLString!
  async categories(): Promise<string[]> {
    const categories = await api.fetchCategories()
    return categories.map((cat) => cat.name)
  }
}

Upgrading from 1.0.0 to 2.0.0

Firstly, you must install all the new peer dependencies. This major was a complete rewrite of the reflection of types. From 2.0.0 decapi uses typescript-rtti to infer graphql types from typescript. This should work for all TS types. If you encounter a type which cannot be inferred, please raise an issue. This means you should always have your decorators without explicit type property.

Comparisons to other libraries

decapi does reflection through typescript-rtti, so it can always infer a type directly from typescript without having to write them twice. This is what sets it apart, but there are other differences:

type-graphql

There is a much more popular library with the same goals. Differences:

  1. decapi does reflection through typescript-rtti, so it can always infer a type directly from typescript without having to write them twice
  2. Decapi has smaller API surface-it only has hooks on top of the basic decorators for constructing schemas. Whereas type-graphql has authorization, middleware, guards.
  3. Also decapi supports graphql v16. Typegraphql is still only supporting Graphql v15

typegql

TC39 decorators proposal

Please if you enjoy decapi, go and star repo with the proposal-decorators . That's a way to show the TC39 members that you are using decorators and you want to have them in the language.