Awesome

Trajan

Alignment of complex trajectories from single-cell RNAseq experiments.

Installing Trajan

All dependencies are bundled with Trajan. In particular, Trajan implements its own non-linear solver and does not rely on any external (I)LP solver. To convert different input formats accepted by Trajan you need to install the Boost graph library. To build Trajan, simply run

make

Running Trajan

To begin

First you will need to obtain a pair of trajectories (trees) using any of the available trajectory-building techniques (Saelens et al. 2018), over 50 trajectory inference methods have been developed since 2014. Trajan does not make any assumptions on the type of methods used to build your trajectory, one should take care of converting the output into a suitable input format for Trajan. In our examplary workflow we will describe how to transform the output obtained from Monocle (Trapnell, C. et al. 2014) into a suitable input for Trajan.

In general one should provide for each tree, the following files (input/output formats are described in more detail below):

1. Edge Set: t.tree
2. Map: t.map

additionally a Distance Matrix between all pairs of nodes with an extra row and column correponds to penalty assignment:

• Distance Matrix: distance_matrix.csv

A typical input Folder should look like this:

• t1.tree
• t1.map
• t2.tree
• t2.map
• distance_matrix.csv

An example of inputs is provided in the directory /example.

Usage

Once you have compiled Trajan it can be run easily with the following command:

trajan <tree_1> <map_1> <tree_2> <map_2> <distance_matrix> <align> <constraints> <weightfunc> <k> <vareps> <coneps> <solver>

For our typical input:

trajan t1.tree t1.map t2.tree t2.map distance_matrix.csv output_solution.csv 2 e 0 0 0.0001 2 

Arguments

Hali implements various strategies to find an (or near) optimal solution. Its non-linear solver is based on an augmented Lagrangian approach. Hali can provide an optimal fractional solution or an optimal integral solution obtained through either a fixed parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm or branch-and-cut (BnC). It can also find a (suboptimal) integral solution based on a greedy strategy or enforce integrality by non-linear constraints.

<solver> : 0=greedy
1=fractional
2=FPT algorithm (default) <br> 3=covering-packing
4=greedy branch and bound
5=non-linear integral
6=warm-start integral from fractional <br> 7=BnC with breadth-first-search strategy <br> 8=BnC with depth-first-search strategy <br> 9=BnC with hybrid approach (combine 7 & 8)

Options 3,4 and 6 combine different solver strategies that require problem specific tuning.

Input/Output formats

Input:

<tree> : input tree file in the following format:
[child node] [parent node] default [newline] ...

<map_1> : a map from row index in the distance matrix (start from 0) to nodes in t1:
[row index] [node] [newline] ...

<map_2> : a map from column index in the distance matrix (start from 0) to nodes in t2:
[column index] [node] [newline] ...

Output:

<align> : output the final alignment in file in the following format: [node in first graph] [node in second graph] [fractional solution] [newline] ...

Model adjustment

<constraints> : 0=unconstrained matching
1=forbid crossing edges
2=forbid crossing and semi-independent edges (default)

<weightfunc> : e=edit distance

Miscellaneous

<vareps> : edge weight threshold (all edges with weight below vareps will be ignored) - (default 0)

<coneps> : tolerance - (default 1e-6)

Example Workflow using Monocle generated Trajectories

This section provides an example where scRNA-seq (complex) trajectories are inferred from HSMM (Trapnell, C. et al. 2014) and Fib-MyoD (Cacchiarelli, D. & Trapnell, C. et al. 2018) datasets. The compiled version of Trajan will only take inputs formated in the way described above. To handle different formats as obtained (from Monocle or other trajectory-building tools) output, visualize trees and alignment, we provide an R script with examples (examples.R) in the directory /Rscripts.

Various input types can be easily handled by generating a single Trajan Object. This Trajan Object will allow the user to export the data in the correct input format for Trajan:

Trajan (t1, t1_root = NULL, t2, t2_root = NULL, t1_data = NULL, t2_data = NULL, distance_matrix = NULL, penalty = "avg", method = "euclidean")

• The inputs t1, t2, t1_data, t2_data, distance_matrix must be of type data.frame.

• The input trees t1, t2 can be either: <br>

  • 2D data.frame: each row corresponds to an arc (child, parent), or <br>
  • 2D data.frame of undirected edges ((child, parent) or (parent, child)) and roots: t1_root (string), t2_root (string).<br>

• A dissimilarity/distance matrix where (i,j)-entry corresponds to the distance between i^th node of t1 and j^th node of t2, row names and column names must be matched with t1 nodes and t2 nodes, respectively. A Trajan object is initialized as follows: <br> trajan <- Trajan(t1 = t1, t2 = t2, distance_matrix = distance_matrix) for rooted tree input, or <br> trajan <- Trajan(t1 = t1, t1_root = t1_root, t2 = t2, t2_root = t2_root, distance_matrix = distance_matrix) for undirected tree with root provided.

• In case the distance matrix is not given (=NULL), it can be computed from expression matrix for the (interpolated) cells used to define the trees t1 and t2, stored in t1_data and t2_data in which each column corresponds to expression values of a cell.  The user can specify the distance metrics to be used: “euclidean”, “pearson”, “spearman”, etc, controlled by parameter method :<br> trajan <- Trajan(t1 = t1, t1_data = t1_data, t2 = t2, t2_data = t2_data, method = “euclidean”) for the rooted trees input with Euclidean metric, <br> trajan <- Trajan(t1 = t1, t1_root = t1_root, t1_data = t1_data, t2 = t2, t2_root = t2_root, t2_data = t2_data, method = “pearson”) for the undirected version with Pearson metric.

• Trajan optimization model requires penalty for each node, that it, the cost of leaving a node unmatched from the alignment. This can be computed by independent schemes (penalty = “avg” or penalty = “max”) or the dependent scheme based on solution of dynamic time warping (dtw). Moreover, the user can use any self-defined penalty, stored in the last row and last column of the distance matrix (with keyword penalty).

Export data for Trajan input:

export(trajan, t1_treefileName, t1_mapfileName, t2_treefileName, t2_mapfileName, distance_matrixfileName) or export(trajan) <br> Arguments t1_treefileName, t1_mapfileName, t2_treefileName, t2_mapfileName, distance_matrixfileName are optional. In this case, the export files will have default names: t1.tree, t1.map, t2.tree, t2.map, distance_matrix.csv.

Finally, simply run the binary trajan with the following command line:

trajan t1.tree t1.map t2.tree t2.map distance_matrix.csv output_solution.csv 2 e 0 0 0.0001 2

The optimal solution (alignment between t1 and t2) will be stored in file output_solution.csv.

Visualization of the rooted trees and alignment:

plot_first_tree(trajan) <br> plot_second_tree(trajan) <br> plot_solution(trajan, optimal_path = output_solution), where output_solution (data.frame) stores the optimal alignment between the two trees.

References

The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Trapnell, C. et al. Nature Biotechnology volume 32, pages 381–386 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2859

Aligning Single-Cell Developmental and Reprogramming Trajectories Identifies Molecular Determinants of Myogenic Reprogramming Outcome. Cacchiarelli, D. & Trapnell, C. et al. Cell Syst. 7(3), 258-268 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cels.2018.07.006.

Alignment of single-cell trajectories to compare cellular expression dynamics. Ayelet Alpert, Lindsay S Moore, Tania Dubovik & Shai S Shen-Orr. Nature Methods volume 15, pages 267–270 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.4628.

A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods: towards more accurate and robust tools. Wouter Saelens, Robrecht Cannoodt, Helena Todorov, Yvan Saeys. bioRxiv (2018) https://doi.org/10.1101/276907.