Home

Awesome

uACPI

A portable and easy-to-integrate implementation of the Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI).

CI

[!WARNING] Not yet ready for production use! While the project is mostly feature-complete, it is still under active development. Public API may change, get added or removed without notice.

Features

Why would I use this over ACPICA?

1. NT-compatible from the ground up

Over the decades of development, ACPICA has accumulated a lot of workarounds for AML expecting NT-specific behaviors, and is still missing compatibility in a lot of critical aspects.

uACPI, on the other hand, is built to be natively NT-compatible without extra workarounds.

Some specific highlights include:

2. Fundamental safety

uACPI is built to always assume the worst about the AML byte code it's executing, and as such, has a more sophisticated object lifetime tracking system, as well as carefully designed handling for various edge-cases, including race conditions.

Some of the standard uACPI test cases crash both ACPICA, and the NT AML interpreters.

While a permanent fuzzing solution for uACPI is currently WIP, it has already been fuzzed quite extensively and all known issues have been fixed.

3. No recursion

Running at kernel level has a lot of very strict limitations, one of which is a tiny stack size, which can sometimes be only a few pages in length.

Of course, both ACPICA and uACPI have non-recursive AML interpreters, but there are still edge cases that cause potentially unbounded recursion.

One such example are the dynamic table load operators from AML (Load/LoadTable): these cause a linear growth in stack usage per call in ACPICA, whereas in uACPI these are treated as special method calls, and as such, don't increase stack usage whatsoever.

More detailed overview

Expressions within package:

Method (TEST) {
    Local0 = 10
    Local1 = Package { Local0 * 5 }
    Return (DerefOf(Local1[0]))
}

// ACPICA: AE_SUPPORT, Expressions within package elements are not supported
// Windows, uACPI: Local0 = 50
Local0 = TEST()

Packages outside of a control method:

// ACPICA: internal error
// Windows, uACPI: ok
Local0 = Package { 1 }

Reference rebind semantics:

Local0 = 123
Local1 = RefOf(Local0)

// ACPICA: Local1 = 321, Local0 = 123
// Windows, uACPI: Local1 = reference->Local0, Local0 = 321
Local1 = 321

Increment/Decrement:

Local0 = 123
Local1 = RefOf(Local0)

// ACPICA: error
// Windows, uACPI: Local0 = 124
Local1++

Multilevel references:

Local0 = 123
Local1 = RefOf(Local0)
Local2 = RefOf(Local1)

// ACPICA: Local3 = reference->Local0
// Windows, uACPI: Local3 = 123
Local3 = DerefOf(Local2)

Implict-cast semantics:

Name (TEST, "BAR")

// ACPICA: TEST = "00000000004F4F46"
// Windows, uACPI: TEST = "FOO"
TEST = 0x4F4F46

Buffer size mutability:

Name (TEST, "XXXX")
Name (VAL, "")

// ACPICA: TEST = "LONGSTRING"
// Windows, UACPI: TEST = "LONG"
TEST = "LONGSTRING"

// ACPICA: VAL = "FOO"
// Windows, UACPI: VAL = ""
VAL = "FOO"

Returning a reference to a local object:

Method (TEST) {
    Local0 = 123

    // Use-after-free in ACPICA, perfectly fine in uACPI
    Return (RefOf(Local0))
}

Method (FOO) {
    Name (TEST, 123)

    // Use-after-free in ACPICA, object lifetime prolonged in uACPI (node is still removed from the namespace)
    Return (RefOf(TEST))
}

CopyObject into self:

Method (TEST) {
    CopyObject(123, TEST)
    Return (1)
}

// Segfault in ACPICA, prints 1 in uACPI  
Debug = TEST()

// Unreachable in ACPICA, prints 123 in uACPI
Debug = TEST

There's even more examples, but this should be enough to demonstrate the fundamental differences in designs.

Integrating into a kernel

1. Add uACPI sources & include directories into your project

If you're using CMake

Simply add the following lines to your cmake:

include(uacpi/uacpi.cmake)

target_sources(
    my-kernel
    PRIVATE
    ${UACPI_SOURCES}
)

target_include_directories(
    my-kernel
    PRIVATE
    ${UACPI_INCLUDES}
)

If you're using Meson

Add the following lines to your meson.build:

uacpi = subproject('uacpi')

uacpi_sources = uacpi.get_variable('sources')
my_kernel_sources += uacpi_sources

uacpi_includes = uacpi.get_variable('includes')
my_kernel_includes += uacpi_includes

Any other build system

2. Implement/override platform-specific headers

uACPI defines all platform/architecture-specific functionality in a few headers inside include/uacpi/platform

All of the headers can be "implemented" by your project in a few ways:

Currently used platform-specific headers are:

3. Implement kernel API

uACPI relies on kernel-specific API to do things like mapping/unmapping memory, writing/reading to/from IO, PCI config space, and many more things.

This API is declared in kernel_api.h and is implemented by your kernel.

4. Initialize uACPI

That's it, uACPI is now integrated into your project.

You should proceed to initialization.
Refer to the uACPI page on osdev wiki to see a snippet for basic initialization, as well as some code examples of how you may want to use certain APIs.

All of the headers and APIs defined in uacpi are public and may be utilized by your project.
Anything inside uacpi/internal is considered private/undocumented and unstable API.

Developing and contributing

Most development work is fully doable in userland using the test runner.

Setting up an IDE:

Simply open tests/runner/CMakeLists.txt in your favorite IDE.

For Visual Studio:

cd tests\runner && mkdir build && cd build && cmake ..

Then just simply open the .sln file generated by cmake.

Running the test suite:

./tests/run_tests.py

If you want to contribute:

All contributions are very welcome!

Notable projects using uACPI & performance leaderboards

ProjectDescription(qemu w/ Q35 + KVM) ops/sCPU
proximaA monolithic Unix-like operating system4.635.028AMD Ryzen 7 5800X
ManagarmPragmatic microkernel-based OS with fully asynchronous I/O3.200.618Intel Core i7-14700K
ilobilixYet another monolithic Linux clone wannabe. Currently under a rewrite2.605.515Intel Core i5-13600K
AstralOperating system written in C which aims be POSIX-compliant2.411.598Intel Core i5-13600K
menixA minimal and expandable Unix-like operating system1.359.883AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
pmOSMicrokernel-based operating system written from scratch with uACPI running in userspace703.007AMD Ryzen 7 7840S
OBOSHybrid Kernel with advanced driver loading35.526Intel i5-4570
NyauxKCMonolithic UNIX-like multi-architecture kernel18.009Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

License

<a href="https://opensource.org/licenses/MIT"> <img align="right" height="96" alt="MIT License" src="https://branding.cute.engineering/licenses/mit.svg" /> </a>

uACPI is licensed under the MIT License.
The full license text is provided in the LICENSE file inside the root directory.