Awesome

Vision Transformers with Mixed-Resolution Tokenization

Official repo for https://arxiv.org/abs/2304.00287 (CVPRW 2023 oral).

Current release: Quadtree implementations and image tokenizers.

To be released: inference code and trained models.

Let me know if you're also interested in the Grad-CAM oracle code, or training code for reproducing the experiments in the paper (based on the timm library).

Setup

Install torch and torchvision, e.g. by following the official instructions.

Examples

See notebooks under examples/:

• 01_vis_quadtree.ipynb
  Quadtree tokenization examples with different patch scorers.

• 02_tokenization.ipynb
  Usage examples for the Quadtree image tokenizer and the vanilla ViT tokenizer.
  The tokenizers prepare input images to be used as input for a standard Transformer model:
  they pass the patch pixels through an encoding layer, add sinusoidal position embeddings
  based on patch locations, and prepend the cls_token.

• 03_compare_implementations.ipynb
  We provide 3 different Quadtree implementations.
  This notebook shows that they produce identical results, and compares runtime.

• 04_reverse_quadtree.ipynb
  Usage example for Quadtree reversal (not featured in the paper). This operation turns the results of the Quadtree algorithm into a full-size feature volume, effectively replicating the token embedding of each Quadtree token to match its original patch size.
  This can be useful when you want to apply Quadtree-style processing (e.g. with a mixed-resolution ViT or an MLP) followed by a more standard model (like a CNN).

Patch scorers

We provide implementations for several patch scorers:

• FeatureBasedPatchScorer: the main scoring method presented in our paper, which uses a tiny feature extraction network to create patch representations and estimate semantic information loss.

• PixelBlurPatchScorer: our baseline patch scorer which estimates pixel information loss. Often used in Quadtrees for image compression.

• PrecomputedPatchScorer: useful for running Quadtrees with precomputed patch scores. We use it to visualize the tokenizations induced by our Grad-CAM oracle patch scorer, used for analysis in the paper.

• RandomPatchScorer: fast and useful for sanity checks. Supports seeding.

Quadtree implementations

We provide 3 different GPU-friendly implementations of the Saliency-Based Quadtree algorithm. They produce identical results. They share the same batchified code for image patchifying and patch scoring, and differ in their implementation of the patch-splitting logic.

1. Dict-Lookup Quadtree
   When splitting a patch, its children are retrieved from a dictionary by their coordinates. This is perhaps the easiest implementation to read (see mixed_res.quadtree_impl.quadtree_dict_lookup.Quadtree.run), but it's also the slowest one as the actual splitting logic isn't batchified.

2. Tensor-Lookup Quadtree
   Similar to the dict-lookup Quadtree, but the box indices are kept in a tensor lookup table, where tensor indices correspond to patch location and scale. Much faster than the dict-lookup Quadtree.

3. Z-Curve Quadtree
   Uses an indexing scheme based on z-order curves, where the children of a patch can be found via a simple arithmetic operation. This is our fastest implementation. Unfortunately, it only works for image sizes that are a power of 2, e.g. 256 pixels.