Home

Awesome

REV

Code for the paper REV: Information-Theoretic Evaluation of Free-Text Rationales

Preparation

Create a conda environment:

conda env create -f rev_environment.yml

Activate the environment.

Construct Baseline Rationales for CQA

In case of incompatibility, please use another environment with packages in requirements to run the code

./run_question_converter.sh task dataset_path device

Construct Baseline Rationales for NLI

We first use a template to convert (premise, hypothesis, label) tuple into a baseline rationale: premise implies/contradicts/is not related to hypothesis

python ./esnli_baseline/template.py

Then we paraphrase these templated, vacuous NLI rationales using a pre-trained model

python ./esnli_baseline/paraphrase.py

Train the Evaluation Models

bash ./rev/train.sh device regular task epochs learning_rate
bash ./rev/train.sh device temp task epochs learning_rate

Compute REV

bash ./rev/evaluate.sh device split test_type out_type model_name task

Acknowledgments

The code for constructing baseline rationales (for CQA task) was adapted from jifan-chen/QA-Verification-Via-NLI

Reference:

If you find this repository helpful, please cite our paper:

@inproceedings{chen-etal-2023-rev,
    title = "{REV}: Information-Theoretic Evaluation of Free-Text Rationales",
    author = "Chen, Hanjie  and
      Brahman, Faeze  and
      Ren, Xiang  and
      Ji, Yangfeng  and
      Choi, Yejin  and
      Swayamdipta, Swabha",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)",
    month = jul,
    year = "2023",
    address = "Toronto, Canada",
    publisher = "Association for Computational Linguistics",
    url = "https://aclanthology.org/2023.acl-long.112",
    pages = "2007--2030",
    abstract = "Generating free-text rationales is a promising step towards explainable NLP, yet evaluating such rationales remains a challenge. Existing metrics have mostly focused on measuring the association between the rationale and a given label. We argue that an ideal metric should focus on the new information uniquely provided in the rationale that is otherwise not provided in the input or the label. We investigate this research problem from an information-theoretic perspective using conditional V-information (Hewitt et al., 2021). More concretely, we propose a metric called REV (Rationale Evaluation with conditional V-information), to quantify the amount of new, label-relevant information in a rationale beyond the information already available in the input or the label. Experiments across four benchmarks with reasoning tasks, including chain-of-thought, demonstrate the effectiveness of REV in evaluating rationale-label pairs, compared to existing metrics. We further demonstrate REV is consistent with human judgments on rationale evaluations and provides more sensitive measurements of new information in free-text rationales. When used alongside traditional performance metrics, REV provides deeper insights into models{'} reasoning and prediction processes.",
}