Awesome
iox
English | 中文
Tool for port forward & intranet proxy, just like lcx
/ew
, but better
Why write?
lcx
and ew
are awesome, but can be improved.
When I first used them, I can't remember these complicated parameters for a long time, such as tran, slave, rcsocks, sssocks...
. The work mode is clear, why do they design parameters like this(especially ew
's -l -d -e -f -g -h
)
Besides, I think the net programming logic could be optimized.
For example, while running lcx -listen 8888 9999
command, client must connect to :8888
first, then :9999
, in iox
, there's no limit to the order in two ports. And while running lcx -slave 1.1.1.1 8888 1.1.1.1 9999
command, lcx
will connect two hosts serially, but it's more efficient to connect in concurrent, as iox
does.
What's more, iox
provides traffic encryption feature (it's useful when there is a IDS on target). Actually, you can use iox
as a simple ShadowSocks.
And iox
also provides UDP traffic forward.
Of course, because iox
is written in Go, the static-link-program is a little large, raw program is 2.2MB (800KB after UPX compression)
Features
- Traffic encryption (optional)
- Humanized CLI option
- Logic optimization
- UDP traffic forward
- TCP multiplexing in reverse proxy mode
Usage
You can see, all params are uniform. -l/--local
means listen on a local port; -r/--remote
means connect to remote host
Note: after v0.4, -l/--local
could specify which IP to listen on. If only ports are specified, the default is 0.0.0.0:PORT
-l 127.0.0.1:9999 -l *127.0.0.1:9999 # 127.0.0.1:9999
-l 9999 -l *9999 # 0.0.0.0:9999
`-l :9999` is also OK, but it's not recommended. Because `-l *:9999`(listen on 0.0.0.0:9999 with encryption) is ambiguous
Working mode
fwd
Listen on 0.0.0.0:8888
and 0.0.0.0:9999
, forward traffic between 2 connections
./iox fwd -l 8888 -l 9999
Listen on 0.0.0.0:8888
, forward traffic to 1.1.1.1:9999
./iox fwd -l 8888 -r 1.1.1.1:9999
Connect 1.1.1.1:8888
and 1.1.1.1:9999
, forward between 2 connection
./iox fwd -r 1.1.1.1:8888 -r 1.1.1.1:9999
proxy
Start Socks5 server on 0.0.0.0:1080
./iox proxy -l 1080
Start Socks5 server on be-controlled host, then forward to internet VPS
VPS forward 0.0.0.0:9999
to 0.0.0.0:1080
You must use in a pair, because it contains a simple protocol to control connecting back
./iox proxy -r 1.1.1.1:9999
./iox proxy -l 9999 -l 1080 // notice, the two port are in order
for ew:
./ew -s rcsocks -l 1080 -e 9999
./ew -s rssocks -d 1.1.1.1 -e 9999
Then connect intranet host
# proxychains.conf
# socks5://1.1.1.1:1080
$ proxychains rdesktop 192.168.0.100:3389
Enable encryption
For example, we forward 3389 port in the intranet to our VPS
// be-controller host
./iox fwd -r 192.168.0.100:3389 -r *1.1.1.1:8888 -k 656565
// our VPS
./iox fwd -l *8888 -l 33890 -k 656565
It's easy to understand: traffic between be-controlled host and our VPS:8888 will be encrypted, the pre-shared secret key is 'AAA', iox
will use it to generate seed key and nonce (Normally, nonce shouldn't be reused. But consider that iox's encryption is only for bypassing IDS, in order not to allocate extra space, the TCP stream encryption will reuse the nonce), then encrypt with Xchacha20 (replace AES-CTR with Xchacha20 in v0.3 version)
So, the *
should be used in pairs
./iox fwd -l 1000 -r *127.0.0.1:1001 -k 000102
./iox fwd -l *1001 -r *127.0.0.1:1002 -k 000102
./iox fwd -l *1002 -r *127.0.0.1:1003 -k 000102
./iox proxy -l *1003 -k 000102
$ curl google.com -x socks5://127.0.0.1:1000
Using iox
as a simple ShadowSocks
// ssserver
./iox proxy -l *9999 -k 000102
// sslocal
./iox fwd -l 1080 -r *VPS:9999 -k 000102
UDP forward
Only need to add CLI option -u
./iox fwd -l 53 -r *127.0.0.1:8888 -k 000102 -u
./iox fwd -l *8888 -l *9999 -k 000102 -u
./iox fwd -r *127.0.0.1:9999 -r 8.8.8.8:53 -k 000102 -u
NOTICE: When you make a multistage connection, the Remote2Remote-UDP-mode
must be started last, which is the No.3 command in above example
UDP forwarding may have behavior that is not as you expected. Actually, on GitHub now, there are only examples of forwarding a local listener to a remote host, so I can only implement them with my understanding
You can find why in the source code. If you have any ideas, PR / issue are welcomed
License
The MIT license